UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 


 

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No. )

 


 

Filed by the Registrant ☒                 Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

Definitive Proxy Statement

Definitive Additional Materials

Soliciting Material under § 240.14a-12

STANDEX INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

No fee required.

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)

Total fee paid:

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

 

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 




def14a_page01.jpg

Guide to Standexs Proxy Statement

Invitation to 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

3

(3)

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders

Filing Party:4

(4)

Date Filed:


LOGO


GUIDETO STANDEXS PROXY STATEMENT

INVITATIONTO 2020 ANNUAL MEETINGOF SHAREHOLDERSProposal 1:Election of Directors

3

9

NOTICEOF ANNUAL MEETINGOF SHAREHOLDERS

4

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

5

PROPOSALS

9

Item 1: Election of Directors

9

ItemProposal 2:Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

14

ItemProposal 3:Ratification of Independent Auditors

15

GOVERNANCEGovernance

17

Board Governance InformationLeadership Structure

17

18

Board Committees

20

19

Additional Governance MattersStrategy and Risk Oversight

24

Director CompensationESG Strategy & Risks

26

25

Director Independence & Related Party TransactionsOther Risk and Governance Matters

28

30

SHARE OWNERSHIPDirector Compensation

29

32

Director Independence

33

Share Ownership

34

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

29

34

Director & Management Stock Ownership

29

34

Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

30

35

COMPENSATION DISCUSSIONCompensation Discussion & ANALYSISAnalysis

31

36

Business Highlights

31

36

Objectives and Principles

32

37

Components of Executive Compensation

34

39

Other Compensation Information

44

50

Basis for Determining Executive Compensation

46

51

Risk in Compensation Programs

47

52

Report of the Compensation Committee

47

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation in Compensation Decisions

47

53

COMPENSATION TABLESReport of the Compensation Committee

48

53

Compensation Tables

54

Summary Compensation Table

48

54

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

50

57

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

51

59

Options Exercised and Stock Vested

52

60

Pension Benefits

52

60

NonQualified Deferred Compensation

53

61

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

54

62

QUESTIONS & ANSWERSCEO Pay Ratio Disclosure

57

65

Voting Q&APay Versus Performance

57

66

Questions & Answers

69

Voting Q&A

69

Communications, Shareholder Proposals & Nominations and Company Documents

58

70

Helpful Resources

71

59



INVITATIONTO 2020 ANNUAL MEETINGOFInvitation to 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

SHAREHOLDERS

Tuesday, October 20, 202024, 2023

9:00 a.m., local time

Standex International Corporation Corporate Headquarters

23 Keewaydin Drive, Suite 300, Salem, New Hampshire 03079*

Dear Shareholder,

We cordially invite you to attend Standex’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders. We hope that you will join me, our Board of Directors, and other shareholders at the meeting. The attached Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement contain information about the business that will be conducted at the meeting. Following the meeting, I will present information on Standex’s operations and welcome any questions from shareholders.

Your vote is important to us! If you plan on attending the meeting, you may vote your shares in person. If you cannot vote in person, we urge you to vote via your proxy card, over the phone or on the Internet prior to the meeting. Detailed instructions on how to vote are found on page 5769.

Thank you in advance for voting your shares, and thank you for your continued support of Standex.

Sincerely,

 

LOGOsxi20230824_def14aimg002.jpg

 

David Dunbar

President/CEO

Chair, Board of Directors

LOGOsxi20230824_def14aimg001.jpg

 

FromStanding from left to right: Thomas J. Hansen, Jeffrey S. Edwards, David Dunbar, B. Joanne Edwards, Thomas E. Chorman, Daniel B. Hogan,Michael A. Hickey, Robin J. Davenport, Charles H. Cannon, Jr., Michael A. Hickey. Note: Daniel

David Dunbar, and Thomas E. Chorman.

Seated from left to right: B. Hogan, pictured sitting, second from right, is retiring from the Board on the date of the 2020 Annual Meeting.Joanne Edwards and Thomas J. Hansen.

 

*

Our Annual Meeting will follow all COVID-19 public health protocols, including keeping attendees at social distance and requiring all attendees to wear face coverings, which will be provided. In the unlikely event that we are not able to hold the Annual Meeting in person, we will notify all shareholders, through a press release and at www.envisionreports.com/sxi, regarding an alternative location or remote access.



NOTICEOF ANNUAL MEETINGOFNotice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders

SHAREHOLDERS

The 20202023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Standex International Corporation (the “Company” or “Standex”) will be held on Tuesday, October 20, 202024, 2023 at 9:00 a.m., local time, at the Company’s Corporate Headquarters, located at 23 Keewaydin Drive, Suite 300, Salem, New Hampshire 03079.*

You are receiving these proxy materials in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Standex, International Corporation, a Delaware corporation, to be voted at the 20202023 Annual Meeting and any continuation, adjournment or postponement thereof.

Shareholders of record at the close of business on August 31, 20202023 are entitled to vote at the meeting, either in person or by proxy, on the following matters, as well as the transaction of any other business properly presented at the Annual Meeting:

 

Item

1

Election of Directors: Elect three directors to hold office for three-year terms ending on the date of the annual meeting in 2026;

Item

2

Say on Pay: An advisory vote on the Company’s executive compensation;

Item

3

Ratification of Independent Auditors: Ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for FY 2024.

 

LOGO

Item 1 Election of Directors Set the size of the Board at seven and elect two directors to hold office for three-year terms ending on the date of the annual meeting in 2023; Item 2 Executive Compensation An advisory vote on the Companys executive compensation; and Item 3 Ratification of Independent Auditors Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Companys independent auditor for FY 2021.

On September 8, 2020, we began to mail our shareholders either a notice containing instructions on how to access this Proxy Statement and our Annual Report through the Internet, or a printed copy of these materials. We have provided each shareholder with a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”), which encourages shareholders to review all proxy materials and our annual report and vote online at www.envisionreports.com/sxi. We believe that reviewing materials online reduces our costs, eliminates surplus printed materials and generally reduces the environmental impact of our Annual Meeting. If you would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, please follow the instructions contained in the Notice.

All proxy solicitation costs are paid by the Company. In addition to proxy solicitations made by mail, the Company’s directors and officers may solicit proxies in person or by telephone.

Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we hope that you will vote your shares as soon as possible. We encourage you to vote via the Internet, since it is convenient and significantly reduces postage and processing costs. You may also vote via telephone or by mail if you received paper copies of the proxy materials. Instructions regarding the methods of voting are included in the Notice, the proxy card and this Proxy Statement on page 57.

On September 8, 2023, we began to mail our shareholders either a notice containing instructions on how to access this Proxy Statement and our Annual Report through the Internet, or a printed copy of these materials. We have provided each shareholder with a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”), which encourages shareholders to review all proxy materials and our annual report and vote online at www.envisionreports.com/sxi. We believe that reviewing materials online reduces our costs, eliminates surplus printed materials and generally reduces the environmental impact of our Annual Meeting. If you would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, please follow the instructions contained in the Notice.

All proxy solicitation costs are paid by the Company. In addition to proxy solicitations made by mail, the Company’s directors and officers may solicit proxies in person or by telephone.

Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we hope that you will vote your shares as soon as possible. We encourage you to vote via the Internet, since it is convenient and significantly reduces postage and processing costs. You may also vote via telephone or by mail if you received paper copies of the proxy materials. Instructions regarding the methods of voting are included in the Notice, the proxy card and this Proxy Statement on page 69.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

sxi20230824_def14aimg003.jpg

 

LOGO

Alan J. Glass, Secretary

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE SHAREHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON OCTOBER 20, 2020.

24, 2023

As permitted by the SEC, the 20202023 Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement and the 20202023 Annual Report on Form 10-K are available for review at ir.standex.com by clicking “Financials” and then “Annual Reports.”

 

*

Our Annual Meeting will follow all COVID-19 public health protocols, including keeping attendees at social distance and requiring all attendees to wear face coverings, which will be provided. In the unlikely event that we are not able to hold the Annual Meeting in person, we will notify all shareholders, through a press release and at www.envisionreports.com/sxi, regarding an alternative location or remote access.



PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARYProxy Statement Summary

This summary contains a general overview of this Proxy Statement. It highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement and is meant to be used as a quick reference. This summary does NOT contain all of the information that you should consider before voting. You should read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting.

 

2020 ANNUAL MEETING2023 Annual Meeting 

 

p5.jpg

 

Date & Time

October 20, 2020

9:00 a.m. local time

Location

Standex International

Corporation

23 Keewaydin Drive,

Suite 300

Salem, NH 03079

Who Can Vote

Holders of our Common

Stock as of the record date:

August 31, 2020

can vote on all matters

You are receiving these proxy materials in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of Standex International Corporation, a Delaware corporation, to be voted at the 20202023 Annual Meeting and any continuation, adjournment or postponement thereof.

On September 8, 2020,2023, we began to mail our shareholders either a notice containing instructions on how to access this Proxy Statement and our Annual Report through the Internet, or a printed copy of these materials. The Notice explains how you may access and review the proxy materials and how you may submit your proxy via the Internet. If you would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, please follow the instructions contained in the Notice.

All proxy solicitation costs are paid by the Company. In addition to proxy solicitations made by mail, the Company’s directors and officers may solicit proxies in person or by telephone.

 

AGENDAAND VOTING RECOMMENDATIONSAgenda and Voting Recommendations 

 

Item

Proposals

Board Vote Recommendation

1

Election of Directors

FOR

2

Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

FOR

3

Ratification of Auditors

FOR

How to Vote

 

LOGOIf you hold shares as of the RECORD DATE (August 31, 2023), you can vote your shares using any of the following methods:

 

v01.jpg
Vote by Internet.
Visit
www.envisionreports.com/sxi.
v02.jpg
Vote by Mail. Complete, sign, date and return your proxy card by mail.
v03.jpg
Vote by Telephone.
Call toll-free to 1-800-652-VOTE (8683).
2020 PROXY STATEMENTv04.jpg5
Vote in Person. You may attend the Annual Meeting in person and deliver a completed proxy card or vote by ballot.

 

Internet and telephone voting will be available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, until 1:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on October 24, 2023. You do not need to return your proxy card if you vote by Internet or telephone.


LOGO

Item 1 Election of Directors The Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believe that the Board size should be set at seven and that the two director nominees possess the necessary qualifications and experiences to continue to provide advice to the Companys management and effectively oversee the business and the long-term interests of shareholders. We are asking shareholders to vote to set the size of the Board at seven and to elect the two director nominees to hold office until the 2023 annual meeting and until their successors have been elected and qualified. Please see See page 9 69 for more information. Our Board recommends a vote FOR this Item.details.

 

2023 Proxy Statement5

Item 1

BOARD NOMINEESElectionofDirectors

The Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believe that the three director nominees possess the necessary qualifications and experiences to provide advice to the Company’s management and effectively oversee the business and the long-term interests of shareholders.

We are asking shareholders to vote to elect three director nominees to hold office until the 2026 annual meeting and until their successors have been elected and qualified. Please see page 9for more information. 

Our Board recommends a vote FORthis Item.

Board Nominees & CONTINUING DIRECTORSContinuing Directors 

 

        Committee Memberships
  Name   Age   

  Years of  

Tenure

 

Term

  Expiration  

       A             C         N&CG  

DAVID DUNBAR

President and Chief Executive Officer, Standex International Corporation

 58 6 2020 LOGO LOGO LOGO

MICHAEL A. HICKEY INDEPENDENT

Former Executive Vice President and President of Global Institutional, Ecolab, Inc.

 59 3 2020 LOGO LOGO LOGO

CHARLES H. CANNON, JR. INDEPENDENT

Former Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, John Bean Technologies

 68 16 2021 LOGO LOGO LOGO

JEFFREY S. EDWARDS* INDEPENDENT

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Cooper Standard Holdings, Inc.

 58 6 2021 LOGO LOGO LOGO

B. JOANNE EDWARDS* INDEPENDENT

Former Senior Vice President and General Manager, Eaton Corporation Plc.

 64 2 2021 LOGO LOGO LOGO

THOMAS E. CHORMAN INDEPENDENT

Chief Executive Officer, Solar LED Innovations, LLC

 66 16 2022 LOGO LOGO LOGO

THOMAS J. HANSEN LEAD INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

Former Executive Vice Chairman, Illinois Tool Works, Inc.

 71 7 2022 LOGO LOGO LOGO
  Years ofTermCommittee Memberships
Name         Age

Tenure

Expiration

ACN&CGI&T

Charles H. Cannon, Jr. Independent  

Former Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, JBT Corporation

71

19

2023

p6circle.jpg
p6dot.jpg
p6circle.jpgp6dot.jpg

David Dunbar

President and Chief Executive Officer, Standex International Corporation

62

9

2023

p6dot.jpgp6dot.jpgp6dot.jpgp6dot.jpg

Michael A. Hickey Independent

Former Executive Vice President and President of Global Institutional, Ecolab, Inc.

62

6

2023

p6dot.jpgp6head.jpgp6circle.jpgp6circle.jpg

Robin J. Davenport Independent

Former Vice President of Corporate Finance, Parker Hannifin Corporation

61

2

2024

p6head.jpgp6circle.jpgp6dot.jpgp6dot.jpg

Jeffrey S. Edwards* Independent

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Cooper Standard Holdings, Inc.

61

9

2024

p6dot.jpgp6circle.jpgp6circle.jpgp6dot.jpg

B. Joanne Edwards* Independent

Former Senior Vice President and General Manager, Eaton Corporation Plc.

67

5

2024

p6dot.jpgp6circle.jpgp6head.jpgp6dot.jpg

Thomas E. Chorman Independent

Chief Executive Officer, Solar LED Innovations, LLC

69

19

2025

p6circle.jpgp6dot.jpgp6circle.jpg
p6head.jpg

Thomas J. Hansen Lead Independent Director

Former Executive Vice Chairman, Illinois Tool Works, Inc.

74

10

2025

p6circle.jpgp6dot.jpgp6dot.jpgp6dot.jpg

* Jeffrey S. Edwards and B. Joanne Edwards are not related.

 

A Audit Committee

N&CG Nominating & Corporate

Governance Committee

C Compensation Committee

N&CGI&T NominatingInnovation & Corporate

GovernanceTechnology Committee

LOGOp6headsm.jpg Chair

LOGOp6circle.jpg Member

* Jeffrey S. Edwards and B. Joanne Edwards are not related.

 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTSCorporate Governance Highlights 

We are committed to strong corporate governance practices, which promote the long-term interests of shareholders, strengthen financial integrity and hold our Board and management accountable. The highlights of our corporate governance practices include the following:

 

All non-employee directors are independent

Regular executive sessions of independent directors

All Board committees are comprised solely of independent directors

Annual board and committee self-evaluations

Risk oversight (including cybersecurity) by the full Board and committees

Ongoing review of optimal Board composition

Independent compensation consultant reports directly to the Compensation Committee

Lead Independent Director

Corporate Governance Guidelines

Stock ownership guidelines for directors and executive officers

Regular executive sessions of independent directors
Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance committees are comprised solely of independent directors
Annual board and committee self-evaluations
Risk oversight by the full board and committees
Ongoing review of optimal Board composition
Board members participate in our Company-wide compliance and ethics training programs
Independent compensation consultant reports directly to the Compensation Committee
Lead Independent Director
Corporate Governance Guidelines
Stock ownership guidelines for directors and executive officers
Policy against hedging and pledging of Company stock
Code of Conduct applies to directors & all employees
Annual advisory approval of executive compensation
Board and committees may engage outside advisors independently of management
Oversight of whistleblower hotline

Policy against hedging and pledging of Company stock

SEC compliant clawback policy has been adopted

Code of Conduct applies to directors & all employees

Annual advisory approval of executive compensation

Board and committees may engage outside advisors independently of management

Oversight of whistleblower hotline

Mandatory Board retirement age

Periodic committee chair and membership rotations

Oversight of ESG strategy and reporting

 

 

62023 Proxy Statement 

Item 2

2020 PROXY STATEMENTAdvisoryVoteonExecutiveCompensation

We are asking shareholders to vote on an advisory basis on the compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 36 and the Compensation Tables beginning on page 54. Please see page 14for more information.

Our Board recommends a vote FORthis Item.

At-Risk Compensation Mix 

 

p7mis.jpg


LOGO

Item 2 Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation We are asking shareholders to vote on an advisory basis on the compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 31 and the Compensation Tables beginning on page 48. Our Board recommends a vote FOR this Item.

 

AT-RISK COMPENSATION MIX2023 Pay at a Glance 

 

Named Executive Officer 

Actual

Salary

($)

  

Stock

Awards

($)

  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation
($)
  

All Other Compensation

($)

  Total
($)
 
David Dunbar
President & CEO
  892,597   3,405,266   471,302   164,853   5,098,597 

Ademir Sarcevic

Vice President, CFO & Treasurer

  465,330   799,455   255,564   46,848   1,570,539 
Alan Glass
Vice President, CLO & Secretary
  388,967   536,910   96,789   52,462   1,082,635 

Annemarie Bell

Chief Human Resources Officer

  311,512   225,923   177,054   19,689   734,304 
Sean Valashinas
Chief Accounting Officer & Assistant Treasurer
  275,783   154,791   68,018   18,140   516,731 

Paul Burns

Former Vice President, Business Development & Strategy

  285,088   392,302   -   24,155   881,233 

Flavio Maschera

Former Chief Innovation & Technology Officer

  292,824   245,835   -   1,312,086   1,850,745 

 

LOGO


2020 PAYATA GLANCE

  Named Executive Officer  

Base Salary

($)

   

Stock Awards

($)

   

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation

($)

   

All Other

Compensation

($)

   

Total 

($) 1 

 

David Dunbar

President & CEO

   852,088    2,631,221    335,510    105,138    4,004,684  

Ademir Sarcevic 2

Vice President, CFO & Treasurer

   415,000    1,218,302    149,400    93,896    1,998,119  

Alan J. Glass

Vice President, CLO & Secretary

   360,500    471,528    74,353    19,422    923,717  

Paul C. Burns

Vice President of Business Development & Strategy

   360,500    415,570    147,517    29,250    958,175  

James Hooven3

Vice President of Operations & Supply Chain

   330,000    299,950    83,531    7,175    539,405  

Thomas D. DeByle 4

Former Vice President, CFO & Treasurer

   -    -    -    7,748    119,180  

 

Note:

This table provides thecertain summary compensation information for FY 2020.2023. The Summary Compensation Table and associated footnotes may be found starting on page 4854.

1

As reported in The items here are from select columns of the Summary Compensation Table and not all items are shown here. The total is as reported in the Summary Compensation Table.

 

 22023 Proxy Statement7

Mr. Sarcevic joinedItem 3

RatificationofAppointmentofDeloitte&ToucheLLPasIndependent Auditors

We are asking shareholders to ratify the Companyselection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as CFO on September 9, 2019.the independent auditors of our consolidated financial statements and our internal controls over financial reporting for FY 2024. Please see page 15for more information.

Our Board recommends a vote FORthis Item.

Audit

 

3

Mr. Hooven joined the Company as Vice President of Operations & Supply Chain on February 17, 2020.

 

4

Mr. DeByle retired from the Company on September 20, 2019.

2020 PROXY STATEMENT7


LOGO

Item 3 Ratification of Appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Independent Auditors We are asking shareholders to ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent auditors of our consolidated fnancial statements and our internal controls over fnancial reporting for FY 2021. Please see page 15 for more information. Our Board recommends a vote FOR this Item.

AUDIT

The Audit Committee has approved Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) to serve as our independent registered public accounting firmauditors for the 20212024 fiscal year. Deloitte was appointed on August 26, 2020 after a competitive process and careful deliberation. The Company has not engaged Deloitte at any time during the last two years for any accounting-related matter.

Grant Thornton LLP (“Grant Thornton”) has served as the Company’s independent auditors since 2014.August 26, 2020. During this time, there have been no disagreements between the Company and Grant ThorntonDeloitte on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosures or auditing scope or procedure. Also, during this time, Grant Thornton’s reportDeloitte’s reports on the Company’s financial statements did not contain any adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, nor was itwere they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.

The following are the aggregate audit and non-audit fees billed to Standex by Grant ThorntonDeloitte, the member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, and their respective affiliates for FYs 2019FY 2022 and 2020.FY 2023. A full explanation of the types of fees and Grant Thornton’sDeloitte’s role is contained in “Ratification of Independent Auditors” starting on page 15.

 

Type of Fees  2019 ($)*                                        2020 ($)*   

FY 2022 ($)*

 

FY 2023 ($)*

 

Audit Fees

   1,713,000    1,563,000   1,422,000  1,542,000 

Audit-Related Fees

   361,000    239,000   -  15,000 

Tax Fees

   21,000    21,000   34,000  28,000 

All Other Fees

   2,000    1,000   113,000  2,000 

Total Fees

   2,096,000    1,824,000    1,569,000   1,587,000 

 


 

*

Amounts have been rounded to the nearest thousand.

 

QUESTIONSAND ANSWERSQuestions and Answers 

Please see “Questions & Answers” starting on page 57 69 for important information about these proxy materials, voting, the 20202023 Annual Meeting, Company documents, communication with the Board and the deadlines to submit shareholder proposals and Director nominees for the 20212024 annual meeting of shareholders.

 

82023 Proxy Statement 2020 PROXY STATEMENT

 



LOGO

Item 1 Election of Directors What am I voting on? Shareholders are being asked to set the number of directors at seven and to elect two director nominees to serve three-year terms. Voting recommendation: FOR the election of each Director nominee. The Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believe that the two Director nominees possess the necessary qualifications and experiences to continue to provide advice to the Companys

Item

1

Election of Directors 

» What am I voting on? 

Shareholders are being asked to elect three director nominees to serve a three-year term.

» Voting recommendation: 

FORthe election of each Director nominee. The Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believe that the three Director nominees possess the necessary qualifications and experiences to provide advice to the Company’s management and effectively oversee the business and the long-term interests of shareholders.

Our Board currently consists of eight directors. We have three classes of directors, with each class being as equal in size as possible. The term of each class is three years. Classyears and class terms expire on a rolling basis, so that one class of directors is elected each year.

The term for the twothree director nominees, willCharles H. Cannon, Jr., David Dunbar and Michael A. Hickey, are current Class II members of the Board. Their term is set to expire at the 2023 annual meeting.

Dr. Hogan will retire from the Board effective on the date of the 2020 Annual Meeting. We wish to thank Dr. Hogan for his long and valuable service to the Company. Since 1983, Dr. Hogan has guided the Board particularly in areas of executive assessment, leadership development and competency modeling. His deep historical knowledge and dignified, respectful presence will be missed. We wish him well in his retirement.

With Dr. Hogan’s retirement, shareholders are asked to set the number of directors at seven. Based on the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, theThe Board believes at this time, that seven is the appropriate number of directorsMr. Cannon, Mr. Dunbar and that the seven remaining directors, after Dr. Hogan’s retirement,Mr. Hickey possess the skills, abilities and experience that will guide the Company well in the upcoming year. Initially,to continue serving as directors and has nominated them to serve on the Board had intendedfor an additional three-year term, to recruit and nominate a successor to Dr. Hogan. However,expire at the challenges raised by COVID-19 severely hindered this effort.2026 annual meeting.

During the pandemic, face to face recruitment has proven to be nearly impossible and the Board feels strongly that a robust interview process is preferably performed in person and not remotely. Moreover, the existing seven members of the Board have worked cohesively together since 2018. The balanced and seasoned membership is well positioned to fully address the challenges that may arise in the upcoming year.

For all of these reasons, theThe Board recommends that shareholders set the number of directors at seven and elect DavidMr. Cannon, Mr. Dunbar and Michael A.Mr. Hickey as Class II directors for thea three-year term expiring at the 20232026 annual meeting.

Finally, it should be noted that the Board’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has previously and remains committed to adding another female to the Board when it is able to appropriately recruit a new board member.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEMBERSHIP CRITERIA

Board of Directors Membership Criteria

 

The Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believe that there are general qualifications that all directors must exhibit and other key qualifications and experiences that should be represented on the Board as a whole, but not necessarily by each individual director.

QUALIFICATIONS REQUIREDOF ALL DIRECTORSQualifications Required of All Directors

The Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee require that each director be a recognized person of high integrity with a proven record of success in his or her field, and be able to devote the time and effort necessary to fulfill his or her responsibilities to the Company. Each director must demonstrate innovative thinking, familiarity with and respect for corporate governance requirements and practices, an appreciation of multiple global cultures and a commitment to sustainability and to dealing responsibly with social issues. In addition, potential director candidates are interviewed to assess intangible qualities, including the individual’s ability to engage in constructive deliberations, bothby asking difficult questions, and working collaboratively, with and respecting differing views of other Board members.

Our Consideration of Diversity

Diversity of Board membership is important, because a variety of points of view improves the quality of dialogue, contributes to a more effective decision-making process and enhances overall culture in the boardroom.

In evaluating candidates for Board membership, the Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consider many factors based on the specific needs of the business and what is in the best interests of the Company’s shareholders. This includes diversity of professional experience, race, ethnicity, gender, age and cultural background. In addition, the Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee focus on how the experiences and skill sets of each director complement those of fellow directors to create a balanced Board with diverse viewpoints and deep expertise.

2023 Proxy Statement9


BOARD COMPOSITIONBoard Composition & REFRESHMENTRefreshment

The Board regularly reviews the skills, experience and background that it believes are desirable to be represented on the Board. On an annual basis, the Board reviews each director’s skills and assesses whether there are gaps that need to be filled. As a result, recruitment is an ongoing activity. A snapshot of our directors’ skills, including director nominees, is below, while the full skills matrix can be found under “Board Self-Assessment & Skills Matrix” on page 22.

The Board aims to strike a balance between the experience that comes from long-term service on the Board with the new perspective that new Board members bring, while being sensitive to the benefits of gender and racial diversity. The Board also has a mandatory retirement policy, wherebyunder which no director may stand for re-election if he or she has reached the age of 75. Over the past 6 years, the Company has added 5 new directors due to Board refreshment, including Ms. Edwards, an African American female. We believe this balanced approach creates a renewed perspective that is beneficial to shareholders. Please refer to “Identifying and Evaluating Candidates for Board Membership” on page 23for further information.

 

Snapshot of 2023 Director Nominees and Continuing Directors

 

Demographics

p10.jpg

p10b.jpg

102023 Proxy Statement 


2023 Director Nominees2020 PROXY STATEMENT9


LOGO

Our Consideration of DiversityDiversity of Board membership is important, because a variety of points of view improves the quality of dialogue, contributes to a more effective decision-making process and enhances overall culture in the boardroom.In evaluating candidates for Board membership, the Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consider many factors based on the specific needs of the business and what is in the best interests of the Companys shareholders. This includes diversity of professional experience, race, ethnicity, gender, age and cultural background. In addition, the Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee focus on how the experiences and skill sets of each director complement those of fellow directors to create a balanced Board with diverse viewpoints and deep expertise.While the Board has made a decision to set the number of directors at seven for the 2021 fiscal year, as discussed above, diversity considerations will be included in future candidate searches.

2020 DIRECTOR NOMINEES

 

The following is biographical information for each director nominee and each continuing director. The information includes names, ages, principal occupations for at least the past five years, the year in which each director joined our Board and certain other information. The information is current as of September 8, 2020,2023, except for each director’s age, which is current as of October 20, 2020.24, 2023.

 

Class II Directors - Term Expiring 2023:

chc01.jpg
dd01.jpg
mah01.jpg
2023 Proxy Statement11


Required Vote & Recommendation

Our By-Laws require that, in an uncontested election, each director be elected by a majority of the votes cast. A majority of votes cast means that the number of votes cast “FOR” a director’s election exceeds the number of votes cast “AGAINST” that director. Shareholders that either mark “ABSTAIN” on the proxy card or otherwise abstain from voting will not be counted as either “FOR” or “AGAINST.” Broker non-votes will not be counted as either “FOR” or “AGAINST.”

In the event that there is a contested election, each director will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast, which means the directors receiving the largest number of “FOR” votes will be elected to the open positions.

In the event that any nominee becomes unavailable, the Board may either choose a substitute or postpone filling the vacancy until a qualified candidate is identified. If there is a substitute, the individuals acting under your proxy may vote for the election of a substitute. The nominees have indicated their willingness to serve as directors and we have no reason to believe that either nominee will become unavailable.

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” the election of each nominee.

Continuing Directors

 

LOGOClass I Directors - Term Expiring 2024:

David Dunbar Director Since: 2014, Chair Age: 58 Committees: N/A Business Experience >> Chair, Standex (since 2016) >> President & CEO, Standex (since 2014) >> President of Valves and Controls, Pentair Ltd., (2012-2014) >> President of Valves and Controls, Tyco Flow Control (2009-2012) >> Various managerial and executive roles, Emerson Electric (2004-2009)Mr. Dunbar has decades of executive experience with global manufacturing companies. His diverse background at various operational levels, coupled with his technical engineering education, provides a broad perspective to the Board. As President and CEO, Mr. Dunbar is uniquely positioned to report to the Board on Company activities and guide discussions regarding the Companys strategic growth priorities.Current Board Membership >> Watts Water Technologies, Inc.Past Board Membership >> None

pg12a.jpg
pg12b.jpg

122023 Proxy Statement


pg13a.jpg

Class III Directors - Term Expiring 2025:

 

LOGO

Michael A. Hickey Independent Director Since: 2017 Age: 59 Committees: Audit, CompensationBusiness Experience>> President of Global Institutional, Ecolab Inc. (2012-2020)>> Executive Vice President of Institutional Sector North America, Ecolab Inc. (2011-2012)>> Executive Vice President of the Global Service Sector, Ecolab Inc. (2010-2011)>> Various executive and managerial roles, Ecolab Inc. (1985-2010)Prior to Mr. Hickeys retirement in February 2020, he enjoyed a distinguished career at Ecolab Inc., where he served in managerial and executive roles of increasing responsibility since 1984. Mr. Hickeys track record of leading a solutions-driven business with an intimate customer focus, together with his mergers and acquisitions, marketing and sales and operational experience provides a dynamic voice to the Board.Current Board Membership>> National Restaurant Association>> Womens Food Service Foundation>> St. Catherine UniversityPast Board Membership>> None

10

2020 PROXY STATEMENT


REQUIRED VOTE & RECOMMENDATION

pg13b.jpg

 

Our By-Laws require that, in an uncontested election, each director be elected by a majority of the votes cast. A majority of votes cast means that the number of votes cast “FOR” a director’s election exceeds the number of votes cast “AGAINST” that director. Shareholders that either mark “ABSTAIN” on the proxy card or otherwise abstain from voting will not be counted as either “FOR” or “AGAINST.” Broker non-votes will not be counted as either “FOR” or “AGAINST.”

In the event that there is a contested election, each director will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast, which means the directors receiving the largest number of “FOR” votes will be elected to the open positions.

In the event that any nominee becomes unavailable, the Board may either choose a substitute or postpone filling the vacancy until a qualified candidate is identified. If there is a substitute, the individuals acting under your proxy may vote for the election of a substitute. The nominees have indicated their willingness to serve as directors and we have no reason to believe that either nominee will become unavailable.

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” setting the number of directors at seven and “FOR” the election of each nominee.

pg13c.jpg

 

CONTINUING DIRECTORS

2023 Proxy Statement13

 

CLASS I DIRECTORS - TERM EXPIRING 2021:

LOGO

Charles H. Cannon, Jr. Independent Director Since: 2004 Age: 68 Committees: Audit, CompensationBusiness Experience >> Executive Chairman, JBT (2013-2014)>> Chairman and CEO, JBT (2008-2013)>> Vice President and Senior Vice President, FMC Technologies (2001-2008)>> Various managerial and executive positions, FMC Technologies (1994-2001)Mr. Cannon has several decades of senior executive experience at an international manufacturing company that operates in some of the same industries as our Company. Mr. Cannon contributes his demonstrated executive leadership skills, as well as his knowledge of corporate organization, finance and operations to the Board. Mr. Cannons technical and business education, coupled with his global perspective, provide a unique voice to our Board.Current Board Membership>> NonePast Board Membership>> JBT

LOGO

Jeffrey S. Edwards Independent Director Since: 2014 Age: 58 Committees: Compensation (Chair), Nominating & Corporate GovernanceBusiness Experience>> Chairman, Cooper Standard (since 2013)>> CEO, Cooper Standard (since 2012)>> Corporate Vice President, Group Vice President and General Manager of the Automotive Experience Asia Group & North America, Johnson Controls, Inc. (2002-2012)>> Various managerial & executive positions, Johnson Controls, Inc. (1984-2002)Mr. Edwards successful and lengthy history of leading a global manufacturing business has enabled him to advise the Board in a myriad of ways, including how to address operational and growth challenges and how to execute both short and long-term performance strategies. Mr. Edwards contributes his management acumen, knowledge of global manufacturing and insight into peer practices to the Board.Current Board Membership>> Cooper Standard Holdings, Inc.>> Cooper Standard Foundation, Inc. (privately held)Past Board Membership>> None


 

Item

2

Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation


» What am I voting on?
We are asking shareholders to vote on an advisory basis on the compensation paid to our named executive officers as described in this Proxy Statement.


» Voting recommendation:
2020 PROXY STATEMENTFOR

11


LOGO

B. Joanne Edwards Independent Director Since: 2018 Age: 64 Committees: Audit, Nominating & Corporate GovernanceBusiness Experience>> Senior VP & GM, Residential & Wiring Device Division, Eaton (2013-2017)>> VP & GM, Residential Products, Eaton (2011-2013)>> Senior Business Unit Manager, Residential Products, Eaton (2007-2011)>> President, Veris Industries LLC (2002-2007)Ms. Edwards distinguished career as a senior executive in various global diversified manufacturing companies is of great benefit to our Board. Prior to her retirement, Ms. Edwards had increasingly responsible roles with strategic, financial and operational reach. She provides a wealth of insight into profit and growth strategies, both in the short term and the long term, which is beneficial to the Board as Standex continues to execute on its growth strategies and initiatives. Ms. Edwards decades of leadership and management experience adds value to the Boards deliberations.Current Board Membership>> Amsted IndustriesPast Board Membership>> Pauline Auberle Foundation>> Self Enhancement Inc.>> Anesthesiologists, Inc.>> Terasys, Inc.

CLASS III DIRECTORS - TERM EXPIRING 2022:

LOGO

Thomas E. Chorman Independent Director Since: 2004 Age: 66 Committees: Audit, Compensation, Nominating & Corporate Governance (Chair)Business Experience>> CEO, Solar LED Innovations, LLC (since 2008)>> CEO & President, Foamex (2001-2006)>> CFO, Ansell Healthcare (2000-2001)>> CFO, Armstrong World Industries (1997-2000)Mr. Chorman is a seasoned financial professional, with experience as a financial executive, an entrepreneur and a private equity investor. Mr. Chorman remains involved in the day to day financial reporting obligations of established, publicly traded, global companies as well as smaller startups. Mr. Chormans financial background provides a significant benefit to the Board when analyzing acquisition opportunities and when evaluating both the current financial results and long range strategic plans of Standex .Current Board Membership>> NonePast Board Membership>> Symmetry Medical, Inc.>> Foamex

12

2020 PROXY STATEMENT


LOGO

Thomas J. Hansen Independent Director Since: 2013 Age: 71 Committees: Audit (Chair)Business Experience>> Vice Chairman, ITW (2006-2012)>> Executive Vice President, ITW (1998-2006)>> Various managerial and executive roles, ITW (1980-1998)Current Board Membership>> Terex Corporation>> Mueller Water Products, Inc.Prior to his retirement, Mr. Hansen had a long and distinguished career with a global manufacturing company that has similar diversified aspects to Standex. Mr. Hansens broad end-market knowledge and acquisition experience, as well as his service on other global manufacturers boards, provide valuable insight to the Board. Mr. Hansens integrity and independent judgment make him especially well-suited for the role of Lead Independent Director, which he has held since 2016.Past Board Membership >> ITW>> CDW Corporation>> Gill Industries

2020 PROXY STATEMENT13


LOGO

Item 2 Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation>> What am I voting on?We are asking shareholders to vote on an advisory basis on the compensation paid to our named executive officers as described in this Proxy Statement.>> Voting recommendation:FOR the say-on-pay proposal

At each annual meeting, the Board provides shareholders with the opportunity to cast an advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers. Please see the “Summary Compensation Table” starting on page 4854for full details. This proposal, commonly known as a “Say on Pay” proposal, gives our shareholders the opportunity to endorse or not endorse our executive compensation programs and policies and the total compensation paid to our named executive officers. This advisory vote does not address any specific element of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and our compensation philosophy, policies and practices, as detailed in the “Compensation Discussion & Analysis” starting on page 3136.

Although this vote is non-binding, the Board values the opinions of the Company’s shareholders and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions for our named executive officers.

As described in more detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) section, we have designed our executive compensation programs to align the long-term interests of our executives with those of our shareholders, attract and retain talented individuals and reward current performance. A large portion of the compensation is tied to the Company’s performance and is paid in both performance and time-based equity that does not vest for 3 years.equity. This closely aligns both the short-term and long-term interests of our executives with those of shareholders and drives the creation of shareholder value.

We encourage shareholders to review the CD&A, which describes our philosophy and business strategy underpinning the programs, the individual elements of the compensation programs and how our compensation plans are administered.

REQUIRED VOTE & RECOMMENDATION

Required Vote & Recommendation

 

Approval of this advisory proposal will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast in person or represented by proxy. Abstentions will not count as votes cast on this proposal, so abstentions will have no effect on the outcome. Broker non-votesnon- votes will not be considered to have voted on this proposal, so will have no effect on the outcome.

The advisory vote on executive compensation is non-binding, therefore, our Board will not be obligated to take any compensation actions or adjust our executive compensation programs or policies as a result of the vote. Notwithstanding, the resolution will be considered passed with the affirmative vote of the majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting.

The Board recommends that you vote “FOR” the following non-binding resolution:

RESOLVED, that the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.

 

142023 Proxy Statement 


2020 PROXY STATEMENTItem

3


LOGO

Item 3 Ratification of Independent Auditors>> What am I voting on?We are asking our shareholders to ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent auditors of our consolidated financial statements and our internal controls over financial reporting for FY 2021.>> Voting recommendation:FOR the ratification of the Audit Committees

Ratification of Independent Auditors


» What am I voting on?
We are asking our shareholders to ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent auditors of our consolidated financial statements and our internal controls over financial reporting for FY 2024.


» Voting recommendation:
FOR the ratification of the Audit Committee’s selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP

The Audit Committee has approved Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) to serve as our independent registered public accounting firmauditors for the 20212024 fiscal year. Deloitte was appointed on August 26, 2020 after a competitive process and careful deliberation.2020. The Company hasdid not engagedengage Deloitte at any time during the last two years before the appointment for any accounting-related matter.

Grant Thornton LLP (“Grant Thornton”) has served as In the Company’s independent auditorstime since 2014. During this time, there have been no disagreements between the Company and Grant Thornton on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosures or auditing scope or procedure. Also, during this time, Grant Thornton’s reportDeloitte’s appointment, Deloitte’s reports on the Company’s financial statements did not contain any adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, nor was itDeloitte’s opinion qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.

We are asking our shareholders to ratify the appointment of Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm.auditors. Although shareholder ratification is not required, the Board is submitting the proposal because we value our shareholders’ views on the Company’s independent auditorauditors and as a matter of good corporate practice. In the event that our shareholders fail to ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee will investigate the reasons and consider selecting a different firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee may select a different independent auditorauditors at any time during the year if it determines such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.

A representative from Grant ThorntonDeloitte will be available at the Annual Meeting to, as requested, make a statement, speak with shareholders or answer anyrespond to appropriate questions.

PRE-APPROVAL POLICY

Pre-Approval Policy

 

All services performed in FY 20202023 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with the Audit Committee’s charter. The pre-approval policy requires the independent auditorauditors to submit an itemization of the services to be provided and fees to be incurred during the fiscal year. The Audit Committee approves the scope and timing of the external audit plan and focuses on any matters that may affect the scope of the audit or the independence of the independent auditor. In that regard, the Audit Committee receives certain representations from the independent auditorauditors regarding its independence and the permissibility, under the applicable laws and regulations, of any services provided.

Once the initial audit plan has been approved, any requests for additional services or fees must be submitted to the Audit Committee for approval. These additional services may not commence until the Audit Committee reviews and approves the request.

These requests for approval are normally evaluated during regularly scheduled Audit Committee meetings. However, if a request is submitted between meeting times, the CFO or the Chair of the Audit Committee may approve the request pursuant to a delegation of authority. For the CFO, this approval authority is limited to services valued at less than $25,000, while for the Chair of the Audit Committee, the approval authority is limited to services valued at less than $100,000. Any requests for services exceeding $100,000 must be approved by the full Audit Committee. If either the CFO or the Chair has exercised their approval authority, they must disclose all approval determinations to the full Audit Committee at the next regularly scheduled meeting.

 

Relationship with Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

2020 PROXY STATEMENT15


RELATIONSHIPWITH INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

The Audit Committee reviews all relationships between the independent auditor and the Company, including the provision of non-audit services. Grant ThorntonDeloitte has provided limited non-audit services to the Company which are made up of agreed upon procedures performed in Ireland in connection with a government grant.related to tax compliance, tax advisory and transaction due diligence services.

The Audit Committee considered the effect of Grant Thornton’s Deloitte’s non-audit services in assessing its independence. After discussion with Company management and Grant Thornton,Deloitte, the Audit Committee concluded that the provision of these services was permitted under the rules and regulations concerning auditor independence.

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FEES

2023 Proxy Statement15


Independent Auditors Fees

 

The following table summarizes the aggregate fees for Grant Thornton’saudit and non-audit services incurred by the Company. The Audit Committee pre-approved all of these audit and non-audit fees in accordance with the pre-approval policy described above.

 

Type of Fees  2019 ($)*       2020 ($)*   Description 

FY 2022 ($)*

  FY 2023 ($)* 

Description

Audit Fees

   1,713,000   1,563,000   Fees for audit services performed during fiscal years 2019 and 2020 consisted substantially of: auditing the Company’s annual financial statements, reviewing the Company’s quarterly financial statements, audit services in connection with the adoption of ASC 842 and audit services in connection with acquisitions and divestitures. 1,422,000  1,542,000 

Fees for audit services performed during FY 2022 and FY 2023 relate to professional services rendered in connection with the annual audit of our consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting; the reviews of the condensed consolidated financial statements performed in connection with each of our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q; and statutory audits required by foreign jurisdictions.

Audit-Related Fees

   361,000   239,000   Fees for audit-related services performed during fiscal years 2019 and 2020 consisted substantially of international statutory audit-related services in Germany, India, Ireland, Malaysia, Mexico, Portugal and the United Kingdom. -  15,000 

Fees for audit-related services in FY 2023 were for review of an SEC Comment Letter.

Tax Fees

   21,000   21,000   Fees for tax services performed during fiscal years 2019 and 2020 consisted substantially of tax assistance in Malaysia, Mexico, the Netherlands and Turkey. 34,000  28,000 

Fees for tax services during FY 2022 and FY 2023 consisted of fees billed for permissible professional services performed by Deloitte Tax LLP and its global member firm affiliates, an affiliate of Deloitte, for tax compliance, planning and advice.

All Other Fees

   2,000   1,000   Fees for all other services in 2019 and 2020 represent agreed upon procedures performed by Grant Thornton in Ireland in connection with a government grant. 113,000  2,000 All other fees for FY 2022 related to transaction diligence services. All other fees for FY 2023 are for a subscription to an accounting research tool used for accounting and financial disclosures.

Total Fees

   2,096,000   1,824,000      1,569,000   1,587,000  

 


 

*

Amounts have been rounded to the nearest thousand.

Amounts have been rounded to the nearest thousand.

REQUIRED VOTE & RECOMMENDATION

Required Vote & Recommendation

 

Approval of this advisory proposal will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast in person or represented by proxy. Abstentions will not count as votes cast on this proposal, so abstentions will have no effect on the outcome. Broker non-votesnon- votes will be considered as a vote “FOR” this proposal.

The Board recommends that you vote “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firmauditors for the 20212024 fiscal year.

 

162023 Proxy Statement 

2020 PROXY STATEMENT



Governance

The purpose of corporate governance is to ensure that we maximize shareholder value consistent with a business model of integrity, ethical practices and compliance with all applicable law.

As part of its duties to the Company, the Board monitors and oversees the proper safeguarding of the assets of the Company, the maintenance of appropriate financial and other internal controls and the Company’s compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Additionally, the Board monitors and oversees the governance practices of the CEO and senior management.

In order to serve the best interests of shareholders while carrying out its purpose, the Board has established internal guidelines— the Corporate Governance Guidelines — designed to promote effective oversight of the Company’s governance program and principles, beginning with the Board itself. You can access these materials by going to ir.standex.com and clicking on “Governance.” See page 71for instructions on receiving copies of our corporate governance materials.

GOVERNANCEGovernanceHighlights

 

The purpose of corporate governance is to ensure that we maximize shareholder value consistent with a business model of integrity, ethical practices and compliance with all applicable law.

As part of its duties to the Company, the Board monitors and oversees the proper safeguarding of the assets of the Company, the maintenance of appropriate financial and other internal controls and the Company’s compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Additionally, the Board monitors and oversees the governance practices of the CEO and senior management.

In order to serve the best interests of shareholders while carrying out its purpose, the Board has established internal guidelines, the Corporate Governance Guidelines, designed to promote effective oversight of the Company’s governance program and principles, beginning with the Board itself.

BOARD GOVERNANCE INFORMATION

ROLEOFTHE BOARD

The key responsibilities of the Board, as a whole, include oversight of business strategy; succession planning for the CEO and for senior management; oversight of compliance; and oversight of risk management.

STRATEGY

Oversight of the Company’s business strategy and strategic planning is a key responsibility of the Board. The Board believes that overseeing and monitoring strategy is a continuous process - one that involves constant assessment to ensure that Company performance in the short and in the long term are consistent with creating and maximizing shareholder value. The Company’s management, on the other hand, are tasked with executing the business strategy. The Board receives regular updates and actively engages with senior management to monitor execution of the business strategy.

SUCCESSION PLANNING

The Board believes that one of its primary responsibilities is to oversee the development and retention of senior talent and to ensure that an appropriate succession plan is in place for our CEO and other members of senior management.

LOGO

Governance HighlightsWeWe are committed to good corporate governance, which promotes the long-term interests of our shareholders, strengthens Board and management accountability and helps build public trust in Standex.Board PracticesAllStandex.

Board Practices

   All non-employee directors are independentRegularindependent

   Regular executive sessions of independent directorsAudit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governancedirectors

   All Board committees are comprised solely of independent directorsAnnual boarddirectors

   Annual Board and committee self-evaluationsRiskself-evaluations

   Risk oversight (including cybersecurity) by the full Board and committeesOngoingcommittees

   Ongoing review of optimal Board compositionBoard members participate in our Company-wide compliance and ethics training programsCorporate Governance Guidelinescomposition

   Independent compensation consultant reports directly to the compensation committeeLeadcommittee

   Lead Independent DirectorStockDirector

   Corporate Governance Guidelines

   Stock ownership guidelines for directors and executive officersPolicyofficers

   Policy against hedging and pledging of Company stockCodestock

   SEC compliant clawback policy has been adopted

   Code of Conduct applies to directors and all employeesAnnualemployees

   Annual advisory approval of executive compensationBoardcompensation

   Board and committees may engage outside advisors independently of management

   Oversight of whistleblower hotline

   Mandatory Board retirement age

   Periodic committee chair and membership rotations

   Oversight of ESG strategy and reporting

LOGO

Key Governance MaterialsCertificate of Incorporation By-LawsCorporate Governance GuidelinesCharter for each Board committeeCode of ConductCode of Ethics for Senior Financial ManagementYou can access these materials by going to ir.standex.com and clicking on Governance. See page 59 for instructions on receiving copies of these corporate governance materials.

 
Key Governance Materials
   Certificate of Incorporation
   By-Laws
   Corporate Governance Guidelines
   Insider Trading Policy
   Clawback Policy
   Charter for each Board committee
   Code of Conduct
   Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Management
   Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy

You can access these materials by going to ir.standex.com and clicking on “Governance.” See page 71for instructions on receiving copies of these corporate governance materials. 

The information on our website is not, and will not be deemed to be, a part of this Proxy Statement or incorporated by reference into any of our other filings with the SEC.

 2020 PROXY STATEMENT2023 Proxy Statement17


COMPLIANCE

We view compliance with applicable laws and regulations as a foundational minimum for ethical business practices. The Board oversees our compliance policies and procedures to ensure the effective performance of management’s duties. Having our Code of Conduct apply to all employees, as well as the Board, sends the message that we are all committed to doing the right thing. Our specific compliance policies detail the ethical framework found in the Code of Conduct. Together, these compliance efforts assure that we act effectively and efficiently in the best interests of shareholders.

RISK

The CEO and other members of senior management are primarily responsible for managing the risks the Company faces. Our Enterprise Risk Management process is driven by our Corporate Governance Officer (a senior member of our internal legal department), in cooperation with the Company’s Director of Internal Audit, risk management department, CFO and other members of senior management. Risks are assessed and categorized in order to put in place appropriate mitigation plans. Risk factors are reviewed and rated according to their likelihood of occurrence, financial and intangible impact if occurrence took place, and velocity (how quickly the risk could affect the business). Mitigation plans are developed for the top identified risks. These risk assessments and mitigation plans are presented to the full Board for review and discussion.

Given the presence and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, a custom created risk assessment and mitigation tool has been implemented to aid in planning for pandemic contingencies.

The Board’s responsibility regarding risk management is to oversee the Company’s risk management policies and procedures and provide guidance on the overall effectiveness of the policies and procedures. To fulfill this responsibility, the Audit Committee receives reports, on a quarterly basis, regarding the risks that have been identified and the measures that are being taken. The Audit Committee also receives reports on a regularly scheduled quarterly basis, presented by our Corporate Governance Officer and our Chief Legal Officer regarding material litigation, legal loss contingencies and calls received on our whistleblower hotline. The Board is regularly informed through the Audit Committee’s reports and through direct communications from senior management.

The Board and each committee’s risk oversight roles, as provided in their respective charters, are evaluated on an annual basis to determine whether the risk oversight responsibilities are being discharged effectively. The Board undertook this evaluation in FY 2020 and found that changing the current structure of risk oversight was not warranted. Other risk factors facing the Company are described in the Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on August 25, 2020, under the Part I Section entitled “Item IA. Risk Factors.”

LOGO

Board of Directors: Oversees Major Risks" Strategic" Competitive" Financial" Cybersecurity" Operational" Legal" Regulatory" Succession PlanningCommitteesAudit Committee Primary Risk Oversight" Financial statement integrity & reporting" Major financial & other business risk exposure" Oversight of the independent auditor" Legal, regulatory & compliance" Internal controlsCompensation Committee Primary Risk Oversight" Employee compensation practices and policies" Administration of compensation policies and programs" CEO Succession planningNominating & Corporate Governance CommitteePrimary Risk Oversight" Governance structure and processes" Legal and policy matters concerning corporate governance" Board membership candidacyManagement: Key Risk Responsibilities" Business Units identify and manage business risks" Design of risk framework, including risk appetite and boundaries" Internal Audit provides independent assurance regarding the design and effectiveness of our internal controls

 

Board Leadership Structure

18

2020 PROXY STATEMENT


BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

The Board recognizes that one of its key responsibilities is to evaluate and determine its optimal leadership structure in order to best serve shareholders’ interests. To ensure an efficient and high-functioning board, in 2016, the Board elected our President and CEO, David Dunbar, to serve as Chair of the Board. In its determination that Mr. Dunbar should serve in this role, our Board examined several factors and believed that Board independence and management oversight were effectively maintained through the Board’s composition of independent directors, the committee system and a seasoned and engaged Lead Independent Director. A combined CEO and Chair role serves as an effective bridge between the Board and senior management and also provides strong unified leadership of the Company.

Optimal Board leadership structure may change as circumstances warrant. The Board reviews its determination annually in accordance with the Corporate Governance Guidelines. This annual review allows the Board to maintain flexibility and promote the execution of the Company’s strategy, the independent oversight of senior management and the best interests of shareholders. In the event the Board determines that a different leadership structure is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders, the Board will consider a change.

BOARD DUTIESAND RESPONSIBILITIES

Within the Board leadership structure are three distinct roles with specific duties and responsibilities. These duties and responsibilities are described below and are set forth in the Company’s By-Laws and Corporate Governance Guidelines.

CHAIROFTHE BOARD

Chair of the Board

 

u

Presides over meetings of the Board.

Presides over meetings of the Board.shareholders.

u

Presides over meetings of shareholders.

u

Consults and advises the Board and its committees on the business and affairs of the Company.

Performs such other duties as may be assigned by the Board.

Chief Executive Officer

In charge of the affairs of the Company, subject to the overall direction and supervision of the Board and its committees onand subject to such powers as reserved by the business and affairs of the Company.

u

Performs such other duties as may be assigned by the Board.

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Lead Independent Director

 

u

In charge of the affairs of the Company, subject to the overall direction and supervision of the Board and its committees and subject to such powers as reserved by the Board.

LEAD INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

u

Presides at all meetings of the Board at which the Chair of the Board is not present, including all executive sessions of independent directors.

Encourages and facilitates active participation of all directors.

Serves as a liaison between the independent directors and the Chair of the Board is not present, including all executive sessions ofon particular issues brought up by independent directors.

u

EncouragesCalls and facilitates active participationleads the executive sessions of allindependent directors.

u

Serves as a liaison between the independent directors and the Chair ofLeads the Board on particular issues brought up by independent directors.discussions regarding the CEO’s annual evaluation and succession planning.

u

CallsProvides feedback on information flow from management to the Board.

Available to advise committee chairs in fulfilling their designated roles and leads the executive sessions of independent directors.responsibilities.

u

Leads the Board discussions regarding the CEO’s annual evaluation and succession planning.

u

Provides feedback on information flow from management to the Board.

u

Available to advise committee chairs in fulfilling their designated rolesfor consultation and responsibilities.communication with shareholders, where appropriate and upon reasonable request.

u

Performs such other functions as the Board or other directors may request.

182023 Proxy Statement 


Available for consultation and communication with shareholders, where appropriate and upon reasonable request.Board Committees

The Board maintains four Committees:

audit01.jpg
comp2.jpg
nom3.jpg
inn4.jpg
uAudit Compensation 

Performs such other functions as the Board or other directors may request.Nominating & Corporate 

Governance

Innovation &

Technology

Only independent directors are eligible to serve on the Audit, Compensation and Nominating & Corporate Governance (“N&CG”) Committees. Each committee is governed by a written charter. To view the charters of these committees, please go to ir.standex.com, click on “Governance,” then “Committee Charters.”

During FY 2023, the Board formally created the Innovation & Technology Committee.

MEETINGSOFTHE BOARD: DIRECTOR ATTENDANCEMeeting Attendance

Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, directors have a duty to attend, whenever possible, all Board and committee meetings for committees on which the director serves. The Board held 96 meetings in FY 2020.2023, while the committees of the Board held a total of 17 meetings. Each director attended at least 75%75 % of the meetings of the Board and each of the committees on which such director served during FY 2020.2023. All Board members attended the Company’s 20192022 annual meeting of shareholders. The Company anticipates that all of the Board members will attend the 20202023 Annual Meeting.

 

2020 PROXY STATEMENT19

Committee Structure and Membership


BOARD COMMITTEESOur Board designates Committee members and Chairs based on the N&CG Committee recommendations.

 

The Board maintains an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (“N&CG Committee”). Only independent directors are eligibleCommittee recommended, and the Board approved, that all committee chairs and committee membership be periodically realigned in order to serve on these Board committees. Each committee is governed bymaintain a written charter. To view the chartersfresh perspective for each committee.

For FY 2023, new chairs were appointed for each of the Auditcommittees: Ms. Davenport (Audit); Mr. Hickey (Compensation); Ms. Edwards (N&CG); and Mr. Chorman (Innovation & Technology). Committee Compensation Committee and N&CG Committee, go to ir.standex.com, click on “Governance,” then “Committee Charters.”membership was also realigned.

The following table shows the composition of each committee for FY 2020:2023:

 

 Committee Memberships
NameA    A    C    C    N&CG 

DAVID DUNBAR

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

I&T

 MICHAEL A. HICKEYDavid DunbarINDEPENDENT

greycircle.jpg

LOGO

greycircle.jpg
greycircle.jpg

LOGO

LOGO

greycircle.jpg

 CHARLESCharles H. CANNON, JR. Cannon, Jr. IndependentINDEPENDENT

member.jpg

LOGO

greycircle.jpg
member.jpg

LOGO

LOGO

greycircle.jpg

 JEFFREY S. EDWARDSThomas E. Chorman IndependentINDEPENDENT

member.jpg

LOGO

greycircle.jpg
member.jpg

LOGO

LOGO

chair.jpg

 B. JOANNE EDWARDSRobin J. Davenport IndependentINDEPENDENT

chair.jpg

LOGO

member.jpg
greycircle.jpg

LOGO

LOGO

greycircle.jpg

 THOMAS E. CHORMANB. Joanne Edwards IndependentINDEPENDENT

greycircle.jpg

LOGO

member.jpg
chair.jpg

LOGO

LOGO

greycircle.jpg

 THOMAS J. HANSENJeffrey S. Edwards IndependentINDEPENDENT

greycircle.jpg

LOGO

member.jpg
member.jpg

LOGO

LOGO

greycircle.jpg

 DANIEL B. HOGANThomas J. Hansen IndependentINDEPENDENT

member.jpg

LOGO

greycircle.jpg
greycircle.jpg

LOGO

greycircle.jpg
Michael A. Hickey Independentgreycircle.jpg

LOGO

chair.jpg
member.jpgmember.jpg

 

A Audit Committee

N&CG Nominating & Corporate

LOGO  Chair

C Compensation Committee

chair.jpg

Chair

N&CG Nominating & Corporate Governance CommitteeI&T Innovation & Technology Committee member.jpgMember

2023 Proxy Statement19


Audit Committee

 
2023 Members:
Robin J. Davenport
(Chair)

LOGO  MemberCharles H. Cannon, Jr.

Thomas E. Chorman

Thomas J. Hansen

Independence: 1

4 out of 4

Meetings held in 2023:

4

Key Responsibilities

Appointing, compensating, evaluating, retaining or terminating, as well as overseeing the independent auditors;

Reviewing matters pertaining to auditor independence and the provision of non-audit services;

Resolving disagreements between senior management and the independent auditors regarding financial reporting;

Reviewing and assessing the Company’s financial and accounting policies and procedures as well as the quality and accuracy of annual and quarterly financial statements;

Monitoring the establishment, maintenance and evaluation of the disclosure controls and procedures required by the SEC;

Reviewing programs instituted by the Company’s Internal Audit Department;

Reviewing identified risks and the mitigation measures taken by senior management;

Reviewing the CLO’s reports relating to litigation and compliance;

Overseeing the whistleblower procedures for reporting questionable accounting and audit practices and other matters that may be reported through the whistleblower hotline; and

Overseeing the integrity of metrics in the Company’s ESG program.

1

LOGO

Audit Committee2020 Members:Thomas J. Hansen (Chair)Charles H. Cannon, Jr.Thomas E. ChormanB. Joanne EdwardsMichael A. Hickey Independence: 15 out of 5 Meetings held in 2020: 5 Key ResponsibilitiesAppointing, compensating, evaluating, retaining or terminating, as well as overseeing the independent auditors; Reviewing matters pertaining to auditor independence and the provision of non-audit services; Resolving disagreements between senior management and the independent auditors regarding financial reporting; Reviewing and assessing the Company's financial and accounting policies and procedures as well as the quality and accuracy of annual and quarterly financial statements; Monitoring the establishment, maintenance and evaluation of the disclosure controls and procedures required by the SEC; Reviewing programs instituted by the Company's Internal Audit Department; Reviewing identified risks and the mitigation measures taken by senior management; Reviewing the CLO's reports relating to litigation and compliance; andOverseeing the whistleblower procedures for reporting questionable accounting and audit practices and other matters that may be reported through the whistleblower hotline.1 The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee qualifies as an audit committee financial expert under SEC rules and has accounting or related financial management expertise and is financially literate for purposes of the NYSE corporate governance listing standards. The Board has also determined that each member of the Audit Committee meets the independence standards set forth in the SEC rules and required by the NYSE.

 

20

2020 PROXY STATEMENT


Report of the Audit Committee

REPORTOFTHE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Company’s internal controls and financial reporting are a multi-faceted undertaking, monitored and overseen by the Audit Committee. The Company’s management has the primary responsibility for the Company’s internal controls and financial reporting process. The independent auditors are responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and reporting on the Company financial statements’ conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Additionally, the independent auditors are responsible for providing an attestation on management’s assessment of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to monitor and oversee all of these processes on behalf of the Board. This responsibility includes engaging the independent auditors, pre-approving their annual audit plan and reviewing their annual audit report.

In this context, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the consolidated financial statements with management and Grant Thornton.Deloitte. The Audit Committee has also reviewed management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting and Grant Thornton’sDeloitte’s evaluation of these controls. The Audit Committee further discussed matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB and the SEC. Grant ThorntonDeloitte has provided to the Audit Committee the written disclosures and the letter required by the PCAOB and has discussed with the Audit Committee its independence from the Company and Company management. Finally, the Audit Committee considered whether Grant Thornton’sDeloitte’s provision of non-audit services to the Company was compatible with maintaining its independence.

Based on these reviews and discussions, the Audit Committee has recommended to the Board that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2020 for filing2023 which was filed with the SEC.

Thomas J. Hansen, Chair

Charles H. Cannon, Jr.

Thomas E. Chorman

B. Joanne Edwards

Michael A. HickeySEC on August 4, 2023.

 

sxi20230824_def14aimg005.jpg

Robin J.
Davenport, Chair

sxi20230824_def14aimg006.jpg

Charles H.
Cannon, Jr.

sxi20230824_def14aimg007.jpg

Thomas E.
Chorman

sxi20230824_def14aimg008.jpg
Thomas J.
Hansen

 

202023 Proxy Statement

LOGO


Compensation Committee2020 Members:Jeffrey S. Edwards (Chair)Charles H. Cannon, Jr.Thomas E. ChormanMichael A. HickeyIndependence: 14 out of 4Meetings held in 2020:4Key ResponsibilitiesRetaining or terminating compensation consultants; Reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives regarding CEO compensation; Recommending salary structures and compensation plans to the Board; Reviewing and approving performance and operating goals under incentive plans for senior management; Reviewing and approving senior management's employment agreements, severance agreements and CIC agreements; Recommending changes to non-employee director compensation to the Board; Reviewing management's Compensation Discussion and Analysis to be included in the Proxy Statement; andReviewing the results of the say-on-pay resolution and other input received from our shareholders on compensation practices.1

Compensation Committee

2023 Members:

Michael A. Hickey (Chair)

Robin J. Davenport

B. Joanne Edwards
Jeffrey Edwards

Independence: 1

4 out of 4

Meetings held in 2023:

5

Key Responsibilities

Retaining or terminating compensation consultants;

Reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives regarding CEO compensation;

Recommending salary structures and compensation plans to the Board;

Reviewing and approving performance and operating goals under incentive plans for senior management;

Reviewing and approving senior management’s employment agreements, severance agreements and CIC agreements;

Recommending changes to non-employee director compensation to the Board;

Reviewing management’s Compensation Discussion and Analysis to be included in the Proxy Statement; and

Reviewing the results of the say-on-pay resolution and other input received from our shareholders on compensation practices.

1

The Board has determined that each member of the Compensation Committee meets the independence standards set forth in the SEC rules and required by the NYSE

Under our long-term incentive plans, the Compensation Committee may delegate some decision-making authority regarding awards to the CEO. This authority is limited to granting and approving awards for designated individuals, as long as such individuals are not officers of the Company, as determined by the Board, or directly report to the CEO. Currently, the Compensation Committee has delegated authority to Mr. Dunbar to grant such awards subject to a pool limit authorized by the Committee. The Compensation Committee has not delegated any of its other authority to any individual.

 

The report of the Compensation Committee can be found on page 53at the end of the Compensation Discussion & Analysis.

Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee

 
2020 PROXY STATEMENT2023 Members:
  21

B. Joanne Edwards (Chair)

Charles H. Cannon, Jr.

Thomas E. Chorman
Jeffrey S. Edwards
Michael A. Hickey

Independence:

5 out of 5

Meetings held in 2023:

4

 
Key Responsibilities

Drafting and reviewing the Corporate Governance Charter, Corporate Governance Guidelines and each committee charter;

Monitoring all charters’ compliance with laws, rules and regulations and recommending changes as appropriate;

Reviewing the Company’s policies and procedures for compliance with the Company’s Code of Conduct and Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Management;

Evaluating Board and committee memberships;

Selecting and recommending candidates for Board membership;

Retaining or terminating search firms to identify candidates for Board membership;

Establishing and leading the Board performance review process to measure the effectiveness of the Board, its committees and the individual directors; and

Overseeing the Company’s ESG strategy and monitoring the execution.

2023 Proxy Statement21



LOGO

Report of the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee 2020 Members: Thomas E. Chorman (Chair) B. Joanne Edwards Jeffrey S. Edwards Daniel B. Hogan Independence: 4 out of 4 Meetings held in 2020: 3 Key Responsibilities Drafting and reviewing the Corporate Governance Charter, Corporate Governance Guidelines and each committee charter; Monitoring all charters' compliance with laws, rules and regulations and recommending changes as appropriate; Reviewing the Company's policies and procedures for compliance with the Company's Code of Conduct and Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Management; Evaluating Board and committee memberships; Selecting and recommending candidates for Board membership; Retaining or terminating search firms to identify candidates for Board membership; and Establishing and leading the Board performance review process to measure the effectiveness of the Board, its committees and the individual directors.

REPORTOFTHE NOMINATING & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

The duties and responsibilities of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are broad. The N&CG Committee operates pursuant to the Corporate Governance Charter. In fulfilling the responsibilities and duties contained therein, the N&CG Committee actively reviews all Board principles, guidelines and charters. The N&CG Committee also maintains responsibility for overseeing senior management’s compliance with the Code of Conduct and Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Management. The N&CG Committee further identifies and evaluates candidates for Board membership, evaluates Board committee membership and recommends Company employees for election to Company officer roles. The N&CG Committee is also responsible for overseeing the Company’s ESG strategy. Lastly, the N&CG Committee establishes and maintains a Board performance review process and recommends changes to the Board based on the review.

CODEOF CONDUCTAND CODEOF ETHICSFOR SENIOR FINANCIAL MANAGEMENTBoard Self-Assessment & Skills Matrix

The N&CG Committee has developed and implemented a prescribed self-evaluation process to assess the configuration and enhance the functionality of the Board and each of its committees. This process identifies current Board members’ attributes, expertise and experiences and creates a skills matrix, which is used to identify areas of improvement within Board structure and committee configuration. The self-evaluation is instrumental in evaluating the future needs of the Board in relation to the Company’s strategic goals and identifying the qualifications that a future candidate should have to aid in the achievement of those strategic goals. The matrix shown below details the skills that are evaluated, a description of those skills and how many Board members and nominees are proficient in a particular skill.

Public Company Senior LeadershipIndustry & Market Knowledge
p01.jpg

Provides the corporation with unique insights on developing talent, a productive work culture, and strategy in solving problems in large, complex organizations

p02.jpg

Provides relevant understanding of our business, strategy, and marketplace dynamics

8 out of 87 out of 8
g01.jpgg02.jpg
Public Company GovernanceManufacturing & Operations
p03.jpg

Ensures compliance with laws and regulations and delivers quality improvement and business performance

p04.jpg

Ensures the corporation functions at the highest level of efficiency possible and ensures optimal processes are used in creation of our products

7 out of 88 out of 8
g02.jpgg01.jpg
International BusinessFinancial & Capital Allocation
p05.jpg

Cultivates and sustains business and government relationships internationally and provides oversight of our multinational operations

p06.jpg

Oversees accurate financial reporting, informed decision making on value-adding initiative, and robust auditing

8 out of 87 out of 8
g01.jpgg02.jpg
Business StrategyInnovation & Technology
p07.jpg

Develops and oversees the embedding of a strong customer focused culture in large complex organizations and a demonstrable commitment to achieving customer outcomes

p08.jpg

Furthers our commitment to having a culture that encourages innovative ideas that are translated into development of new and advanced technologies

8 out of 87 out of 8
g01.jpgg02.jpg
Mergers & AcquisitionsESG & Risk Management
p09.jpg

Strategically pursuing complementary acquisitions and joint ventures that enhance our customer base, geographic penetration, scale and technology

alert11.jpg

Risk management frameworks and controls that set risk appetites, identify and provide oversight of key business risk (financial and non-financial) and emerging risks

8 out of 88 out of 8
g01.jpgg01.jpg

222023 Proxy Statement


Identifying and Evaluating Candidates for Board Membership

The N&CG Committee is responsible for recommending candidates for Board membership when the N&CG Committee has identified a need to add new members or when there is a vacancy. Rather than establishing minimum qualifications, the N&CG Committee strives to find candidates whose skills complement the needs presented by the global, multi-sector, engineered manufacturing operations of the Company and whose skills include analytical financial expertise and strategic planning. Candidates must also possess characteristics, such as integrity and sound judgment, that would enable the Board to function cohesively and effectively. The N&CG Committee also evaluates whether a particular candidate has the capacity and desire to make a significant time commitment to serving on the Board. Finally, the Committee focuses on prioritizing the identification of candidates with gender, ethnic and racial diversity who will lend nuanced perspectives to Board discussions.

To identify such candidates, the N&CG Committee has the authority to retain a third-party search firm and to consider suggestions from directors, shareholders and management. The N&CG Committee ensures that the pool of candidates reflects a range of professional experience and expertise as well as diversity of gender, race and ethnicity by instructing the search firm to seek out and present diverse candidates who may expand the perspectives of the Board. The N&CG Committee views diversity expansively and considers depth and breadth of relevant business experience, leadership performance and strategic acumen alongside other immutable characteristics that a candidate may possess.

The N&CG Committee reviews and evaluates each candidate by taking into account all available information concerning the candidate. All candidates, whether identified by a third-party search firm, the directors, management or shareholders, are evaluated based on the same criteria. The candidates must also fit within the existing composition of the Board to be recommended to the Board as a prospective nominee.

Shareholders may submit recommendations for future candidates by notifying the N&CG Committee, in writing, and shareholders may submit direct nominations for inclusion in the Company’s Proxy Statement using the processes described under “How Can I Submit a Shareholder Proposal or Director Nomination?” on page 70. Please attach any appropriate supporting materials.

sxi20230824_def14aimg011.jpg

B. Joanne Edwards,
Chair

sxi20230824_def14aimg012.jpg
Charles H.
Cannon, Jr.
sxi20230824_def14aimg013.jpg

Thomas E. Chorman
sxi20230824_def14aimg014.jpg

Jeffrey S. Edwards
sxi20230824_def14aimg015.jpg

Michael A. Hickey

Innovation & Technology Committee

2023 Members:

Thomas E. Chorman

(Chair)
Michael A. Hickey

Independence:

2 out of 2

Meetings held in 2023:

4
Key Responsibilities

Reviewing, advising and providing oversight on the strategic plan for technology and innovation;

Liaising with senior management regarding significant growth opportunities;

Evaluating the risks and opportunities associated with proposed material investments in innovation and technology;

Assessing the impact of significant innovation and new technology projects on business, growth prospects and strategy;

Advising, monitoring, assessing and making recommendations on technology partnerships, joint ventures and collaborations; and

Advising and making recommendations regarding potential M&A transactions that center around key innovations, opportunities or gaps in the technology portfolio.

2023 Proxy Statement23


Strategy and Risk Oversight

The key responsibilities of the Board, as a whole, include oversight of business strategy; oversight of risk management; oversight of ESG strategy and initiatives; oversight of cybersecurity; oversight of human capital management; and oversight of compliance.

Oversight of Strategy

Oversight of the Company’s business strategy and strategic planning is a key responsibility of the Board. The Board believes that overseeing and monitoring strategy is a continuous process - one that involves constant assessment to ensure that Company performance in the short and long term are consistent with creating and maximizing shareholder value. The Company’s management, on the other hand, is tasked with executing the business strategy. The Board receives regular updates and actively engages with senior management to monitor execution of the business strategy.

Oversight of Business Risks

The CEO and other members of senior management are primarily responsible for managing the risks the Company faces. The Board’s responsibility regarding risk management is to oversee the Company’s risk management policies and procedures and provide guidance on the overall effectiveness of these policies and procedures. To fulfill this responsibility, the Audit Committee receives reports, on a quarterly basis, regarding the risks that have been identified and the measures that are being taken. Additionally, the Audit Committee receives reports on a regularly scheduled quarterly basis, presented by our Corporate Governance Officer and our Chief Legal Officer regarding material litigation, legal loss contingencies and calls received on our whistleblower hotline. The Board is regularly informed through the Audit Committee’s reports and through direct communications from senior management.

The Board and each committee’s risk oversight roles, as provided in their respective charters, are evaluated on a period basis to determine whether the risk oversight responsibilities are being discharged effectively. With the addition of the Innovation & Technology Committee at the beginning of FY 2023, that committee assumed responsibility for overseeing risks associated with investments in new technology and innovation. With this enhancement, the Board believes that the allocation of risk oversight among its committees remains appropriate and enables the Board to discharge its risk oversight responsibilities effectively. For a description of risk factors facing the Company, see the Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on August 4, 2023, under the Part I Section entitled “Item IA. Risk Factors.”

Enterprise Risk Management Program

Our Enterprise Risk Management process is a cooperate process involving the legal, internal audit and risk management departments, along with the CFO and other members of senior management. Risks are assessed and categorized in order to put in place appropriate mitigation plans. Risk factors are reviewed and rated according to their likelihood of occurrence, financial and intangible impact if occurrence took place, and velocity (how quickly the risk could affect the business). Mitigation plans are developed for the top identified risks. These risk assessments and mitigation plans are presented annually to the full Board for review and discussion.

pg24a.jpg

242023 Proxy Statement


ESG Strategy & Risks

We have formalized responsibility for oversight of our ESG program with two of our Board committees. Our Board’s N&CG Committee maintains responsibility for oversight of our ESG strategy, while the Audit Committee is responsible for oversight of the integrity of those ESG related metrics that we publicly disclose. Both of these committees provide pertinent updates to the full Board.

A management-level ESG Council has responsibility for implementing the Company’s ESG strategy and reporting on its effectiveness and accomplishments. The Chair of this ESG Council provides an update to the N&CG Committee at each of its regularly scheduled meetings, while the Company’s internal audit function reports to the Audit Committee on processes for auditing the integrity of ESG disclosures.

The information contained herein outlines our approach to ESG and also highlights some of the key facets of our ESG programs. Additional information can also be found on our website at www.standex.com, by clicking on “Sustainability.”

Responsible Business Practices

We conduct our business fairly and ethically and in a manner consistent with all applicable legal and industry code requirements. Strict compliance, high standards of ethical conduct and a strong values-based corporate culture define how we operate in our work environment, business practices and relationships with external stakeholders.

Human Rights

Standex is committed to high standards of integrity, ethics and sustainability throughout our operations and supply chain. We support human rights, labor rights and anti-slavery in our own operations and within our supply chain. We are committed to respecting all internationally recognized human rights standards, including the rights and principles set out in the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. Our Supplier Code of Conduct explicitly requires all suppliers who currently do business with us, or seek to do business with us, to not engage in any activities that violate human rights or labor rights.

Our Human Rights Policy and Supplier Code of Conduct can be found at: ir.standex.com/policies.

Anti-Corruption

Standex conducts business honestly, fairly, ethically, free from corruption and in a manner consistent with all applicable legal and industry standards. We do not engage in or tolerate bribery or corruption of any kind. We require our employees, suppliers and other business partners to comply with all applicable anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws through our Code of Conduct, Supplier Code of Conduct and our Gifts & Gratuities Policy. We also regularly employ compliance training on these topics to ensure our employees are aware of prohibited practices and the legal requirements.

Political Activities & Lobbying

Our Code of Conduct prohibits the use of company funds, assets, property or personnel to contribute to or support political campaigns. Standex, as a company, generally does not engage in any political lobbying. Standex is, however, a member of the various organizations, such as the National Association of Manufacturers, which does periodically lobby in the interests of its members as a whole.

Community Outreach

Standex CARES is the Company’s community partnership program, which provides our employees the opportunity for service leadership and engagement. CARES stands for Connect, Act, Reach, Engage and Serve. In our vision statement, we commit to “encourage a culture of giving that is a way of life at Standex, extending beyond the walls of our facilities through engagement in our communities and dedicated partnerships that reflect the spirit of our employees.” We execute this vision through our mission statement, in which we “pledge to support local programs that benefit our communities through the four key areas of education, workforce readiness, humanitarian relief, and community engagement to improve the lives of people in our communities.”

2023 Proxy Statement25


Environment, Sustainability & Climate

We share the same world, and it is our priority to bring sustainable practices to our business operations. We are continuing our evolution to improve recycling, increase energy efficiency, reduce waste and improve processes. We are actively seeking, and using, alternatives to critical mineral raw materials that are mined, and we continuously monitor our supply chain to ensure transparent and ethical sourcing.

In FY 2022, we began measuring, on a global basis, the following metrics in order to set a baseline against which improvement can be measured:

Electricity consumption

Natural gas consumption

Heating oil consumption

Solid waste generation

Recycling

Water consumption

Waste water disposal

In FY 2023, we set reduction targets for the foregoing metrics.

For more information, please see: standex.com/environment/.
 

Climate

We believe that focused and sustained action is required to address climate change and its implications. We recognize that climate change poses risks to businesses, industries, and broader society. As part of our commitment to operate sustainably, we are taking action to understand climate-related risks and opportunities. We have embedded climate change risks into our Enterprise Risk Management process, and both risks and opportunities into our business strategy planning process at all of our divisions. We have also incorporated energy and waste reduction into the strategic goals for key operations leaders.

During FY 2023, we completed analysis of our Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions globally, and we are working toward the adoption of science based GHG reduction targets.

We are mindful that the transition to a low carbon global economy will require deep collaboration at many levels. We will continue to collaborate with our customers, suppliers and partners to find innovative approaches to minimizing the collective impact we have on the environment.

Responsible Sourcing

Standex is committed to high standards of integrity, ethics, and sustainability throughout our supply chain. To this end, we have been evolving a robust responsible sourcing initiative. The critical components to this initiative include our Supplier Code of Conduct, our Conflict Minerals Program, and the work of our Responsible Sourcing Council.

262023 Proxy Statement


Cybersecurity & Data Privacy

Cybersecurity

Protecting our digital assets and the security of our information systems is a top priority for us. Historically, the nature and scope of our IT applications and systems was almost as diverse as the array of companies that comprised the Standex portfolio. With our transformation into a more focused, high performance operating company over the past several years, we have been rationalizing and standardizing our approach to IT. As a critical component of this effort, we have improved and continue to enhance our IT security controls and protocols.

While management has oversight of cybersecurity execution, the Board and the Audit Committee regularly oversee the general cybersecurity strategy and the efficacy of IT controls. The Director of IT, Security and Compliance is responsible for ensuring the effectiveness of access and security controls, the deployment and use of effective security tools, applications and policies and the training of all employees on applicable IT policies and procedures. The Director of IT, Security and Compliance periodically presents to the Board on the status of and plans for IT security.

In FY 2022, we enhanced our cybersecurity training for all employees with computer access. We have also periodically launched targeted e-mails simulating phishing attacks to educate our employees and address potential vulnerabilities. We also implemented managed endpoint detection and response.

In FY 2023, we continued our focus on cybersecurity training and made further enhancements to our privileged permissions management.

Data Privacy

We value the right to privacy of our employees, customers and business partners. We are committed to protecting the information we receive by collecting, processing, storing, transmitting and using the data in a lawful manner, consistent with legitimate business reasons. Our employees undergo continuous training on data privacy. Business risks and opportunities related to data privacy and cybersecurity are evaluated annually as part of our Enterprise Risk Management process.

2023 Proxy Statement27


Human Capital Management

Culture & Employee Engagement

Standex is committed to creating and sustaining a culture built on mutual respect, inclusion, trust and transparency where employees feel valued and supported for the unique people they are, the skills and experiences they bring to the table and the contributions they make. We believe building a great culture is the foundation for cultivating successful relationships with our employees, customers, shareholders and communities.

On an annual basis, Standex engages with a third party to conduct a global culture survey in which all employees can participate. Results from the survey provide the Company with employee feedback that is used to define, develop and measure culture actioning plans at the Corporate, Business Segment and site level. Our culture survey process helps us attract, retain and develop talent, instill a continuous improvement mindset and discipline across the Company; develop processes and systems that facilitate and support achievement of our strategic goals and objectives; and cultivate a working environment where our employees feel valued and have opportunities to grow and contribute.

In FY 2023, the annual Culture Survey was sent to all 4,000 of our employees in seventeen languages. There was an 82% response rate, representing an 8% increase from FY 2022, with a total of 9,300 responsive comments.

The results of the Culture Survey were evaluated at the Company, business, region and site location level and were assessed against an external aspirational benchmark. In the spirit of transparency and continuous improvement, Company level results were shared during the Company’s Q3 All Employee Webcast and on the Company's internal intranet, and business segment results were shared with those segment employees.

The Company has initiated two concurrent tracks of actioning relative to addressing opportunities for improvement. The “centralized” track focused on actioning the top areas of greatest organizational impact for the Company, initiated by the senior leadership team of Standex, inclusive of corporate officers and business segment presidents. This process included incorporating areas of focus into the Company’s FY 2023 Corporate Strategic Goals. The “local” track focused on business segments, functions and sites independently actioning the top areas of greatest impact unique to their specific survey results.

All business segments were required to develop an actioning plan to focus on priority opportunities for improvement specific to their business and to each facility. Progress against goals is reviewed during the Company’s formal quarterly business reviews.

Succession Planning & Talent Development

The Board believes that one of its primary responsibilities is to oversee the development and retention of senior talent and to ensure that an appropriate succession plan is in place for our CEO and other members of senior management. To this end, the Board undergoes an annual review process with the CEO and senior management to develop, evaluate and make adjustments to succession plans.

Our talent strategy is focused on attracting and retaining the best talent, recognizing individual and team contributions and investing in the ongoing development of our employees at all levels and at every stage of their careers. We are an organization that values continuous learning and personal development.

In furtherance of the foregoing, we maintain a formal management development program pursuant to which we deliver customized in person training courses to high potential employees. In FY 2023, the curriculum was expanded and delivered to our L3 and L4 managers (direct reports of business segment leadership teams) in North America and Europe. All of our employees also undergo annual performance management and development reviews.

282023 Proxy Statement


Diversity, Equity & Inclusion

We are committed to ensuring that Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (“DE&I”) is a top priority across our global organization. For us, DE&I begins first with valuing every employee for the unique individual they are and the skills and experiences they bring to Standex. We strive to create an environment where people feel welcomed and appreciated for the contributions they make every day. We prohibit any form of discrimination, harassment or intolerance and we train employees to understand and recognize these issues. We have policies and processes to address reports of such behavior, including an anonymous hotline managed by an external third party, which reports to our Corporate Governance Officer.

We maintain an Inclusion Advisory Council (“IAC”) to function as a collective advisor to the senior leadership team, the business unit leadership teams and the global human resources community, with a primary focus on identifying goals and actions to increase inclusivity and continue building a listening culture. The IAC consists of employees, at all levels, from every reporting business segment, from all over the globe and from a variety of functional areas (corporate, finance, human resources, management, and production). In FY 2023, the IAC started the Company's first Employee Resource Group (“ERG”), the Women and Leadership ERG. This ERG has executive sponsorship by our Scientific segment President and consists of approximately 50 women and allies at all levels from all over the globe. The goal of starting voluntary, employee-led ERGs at Standex is to foster a diverse, inclusive workplace and build a sense of community.

Employee Wellbeing

We view employee wellbeing as a key component of a strong corporate culture. Our programs have historically included free smoking cessation programs, on-site biometric screenings, health and diet coaching, subsidized gym memberships and flu shots. Providing our employees with the tools to improve their wellbeing – not just physical wellbeing, but also mental, emotional and financial wellbeing – is of paramount importance. We partner with Virgin Pulse, a nationally recognized wellness partner, to enhance our employee wellness offerings.

Employee Communication

We now have a unified voice and brand platform with the launch of our new corporate website, standex.com. The site draws new users daily, amplifying our vision, our businesses and our culture and serving as a beacon for existing employees and a recruiting tool. Internally, Standex Exchange, our digital communication platform is advancing the shift to a cohesive communications ecosystem. The platform empowers customized employee communication and facilitates a robust two-way dialogue that allows us to gather valuable insights. This open communication is a key component to the communication strategy focused on continually strengthening engagement, boosting productivity, and fortifying employee retention.

Safety

Employee safety is a long-standing, top priority. Responsibility and accountability reside with each employee and fosters a spirit of community co-dependence. Monthly safety calls with the Company CEO emphasizes this principle. All locations across the globe are subject to the same standards. Since the beginning of 2020, our global TRIR has consistently been at or below world class levels of achievement that our employees have diligently pursued. Our footprint is global, and we continue to be aware of, and focus on, the change that we can affect when we focus on improvements to all of our worldwide facilities and work practices.

2023 Proxy Statement29


Other Risk and Governance Matters

Compliance

We view compliance with applicable laws and regulations as a foundational minimum for ethical business practices. The Board oversees our compliance policies and procedures to ensure the effective performance of management’s duties. Having our Code of Conduct apply to all employees globally, as well as the Board, sends the message that we are all committed to doing the right thing. Our specific compliance policies detail the ethical framework found in the Code of Conduct. Together, these compliance efforts assure that we act effectively and efficiently in the best interests of shareholders.

Code of Conduct and Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Management

Management has the primary responsibility for creating, maintaining and administering programs to ensure employees’ compliance with the Code of Conduct and the Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Management, (the “Codes”), both of which are available by going to ir.standex.com, clicking on “Governance,” and then clicking on “Policies.” The N&CG Committee routinely receives updates from the Corporate Governance Officer on the existing programs and any proposed programs.

During the past fiscal year, the Company substantially revised On an annual basis, employees are presented with a copy of the Code of Conduct as the prior format was overly formalistic. The updated Code of Conduct is easier for global employees to use and understand and is more visually appealing. The revised Code of Conduct is available by going to ir.standex.com, clicking on “Governance,” and then clicking on “Policies.” It was approved by the N&CG Committee and by the Board on July 23, 2020. During FY 2021, each director and employee will be asked to review andmust affirm their compliance with the updated Code of Conduct.it.

The Company also utilizes an online interactive compliance training program to educate employees on the Codes as well as other regulatory and workplace compliance topics. Employees are assigned training modules on a regular basis to promote ongoing awareness of ethics issues. The Company divisions routinely customize the modules to address ethics issues specific to their organizations.

The N&CG Committee is also responsible for evaluating and approving requests for waivers of the Codes. Any request must be submitted, in writing, to the Chair of the N&CG Committee, who then reports the submission to the whole N&CG Committee. The N&CG Committee then provides their recommendation on the request to the Board. Any waivers granted to executive officers are disclosed to shareholders as soon as practicable via the Company’s website. No waivers have been granted during FY 20202023 or during any prior period.

Additionally, a third-party global, multi-language hotline is available 24/7 at every Company location worldwide, for anonymous reporting of financial, accounting, auditing or other employee concerns. This communication tool is a beneficial outlet for employees to express concerns.

 

22

2020 PROXY STATEMENT

Conflicts of Interest


IDENTIFYINGAND EVALUATING CANDIDATESFOR BOARD MEMBERSHIP

The N&CG CommitteeCode of Conduct requires that all directors, executive officers and employees avoid engaging in any activity that might create a conflict of interest. All individuals are required to report any proposed transaction that might reasonably be perceived as creating a conflict of interest to their supervisor and/or the CLO. During the past fiscal year and for all prior periods, there have not been any reports of such transactions.

Related Party Transactions

The Board has adopted a written policy for the review of certain related party transactions between any director, director nominee, executive officer, beneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of the Company’s securities, or any immediate family member of any of the foregoing (any of the foregoing being a “Related Party”) and the Company. For purposes of the policy, a “related party transaction” is responsible for recommending candidates for Board membership whenany transaction, arrangement or relationship in which (a) the N&CG Committee has identified a needaggregate amount involved will or may be expected to add new membersexceed $120,000 in any fiscal year; (b) the Company or when thereany subsidiary is a vacancy. The N&CG Committeeparticipant; and (c) any Related Party has not established specific, minimum qualifications for director nominees. However, the N&CG Committee strives to find candidates whose skills complement the needs presentedor will have a direct or indirect material interest.

This policy is administered by the global, multi-sector, engineered manufacturing operationsAudit Committee, which will only approve a related party transaction if it is, in its judgment, not inconsistent with the best interests of the Company and whose skills include analytical financial expertiseits shareholders. The Audit Committee may, in its sole discretion, impose such terms and strategic planning. Candidates must also possess characteristics, suchconditions as integrityit deems appropriate in connection with its approval. No director may participate in the discussion or approval of a transaction in which that director, or their immediate family member, has a direct or indirect interest.

When a related party transaction is ongoing and sound judgment, that would enablehas been approved by the Board to function cohesivelyAudit Committee, the Audit Committee will annually review the transaction and effectively. The N&CG Committee also evaluates whether a particular candidate hasdetermine if it is in the capacity and desire to make a significant time commitment to serving on the Board.

To identify such candidates, the N&CG Committee has the authority to retain a third-party search firm and to consider suggestions by directors, shareholders and management. The N&CG Committee ensures that the pool of candidates reflects a range of professional experience and expertise as well as diversity of gender, race and ethnicity by instructing the search firm to seek out and present diverse candidates who may expand the perspectivesbest interests of the Board. The N&CG Committee views diversity expansivelyCompany and considers depth and breadth of relevant business experience, leadership performance and strategic acumen alongside other immutable characteristics that a candidate may possess.its shareholders to continue, modify or terminate such transaction.

The N&CG Committee reviews and evaluates each candidate by taking into account all available information concerning the candidate. All candidates, whether identified by a third-party search firm, the directors, management or shareholders, are evaluated based on the same criteria. The candidates must also fit within the existing composition of the Board to be recommended to the Board as a prospective nominee. As noted earlier in this Proxy Statement, the Board remains committed to adding another female to the Board when it

Since July 1, 2022, there has not been, nor is able to appropriately recruit a new board member.

Shareholders may submit recommendations for future candidates by notifying the N&CG Committee, in writing, using the process described under “How Can I Submit a Shareholder Proposal or Director Nomination?” on page 58. Please attachthere currently proposed, any appropriate supporting materials. Shareholders may submit direct nominations for inclusion in the Company’s Proxy Statement by following the process described under “How Can I Submit a Shareholder Proposal or Director Nomination?” on page 58.

BOARD SELF-ASSESSMENT

The N&CG Committee has developed and implemented a prescribed self-evaluation process to assess the configuration and enhance the functionality of the Board and each of its committees. This process identifies current Board members’ attributes, expertise and experiences and creates a skills matrix, which is used to identify areas of improvement within Board structure and committee configuration. The self-evaluation is instrumental in evaluating the future needs of the Board in relation to the Company’s strategic goals and identifying the qualifications a future candidate should have to aid in the achievement of those strategic goals.

Thomas E. Chorman, Chair

B. Joanne Edwards

Jeffrey S. Edwards

Daniel B. Hoganrelated party transaction.

 

302023 Proxy Statement
 
2020 PROXY STATEMENT23


ADDITIONAL GOVERNANCE MATTERS

 

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY/STANDEX CARESAnti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policies

 

Standex is committed to corporate social responsibility through our own actions and through the actions of our supply chain. We have a Supplier Code of Conduct (available at ir.standex.com, by clicking on “Governance,” and then clicking on “Policies”), which sets forth our expectations for our suppliers. Specifically, we look upon our suppliers as partners and expect that they will conduct their businesses in an ethical manner, act with integrity and engage in behavior that respects human rights, promotes a safe and healthy work environment and is environmentally responsible and efficient.

Our employee engagement program, Standex CARES (Connect, Act, Reach, Engage and Serve) continued to be enthusiastically supported by employees during the fiscal year. This program partners Company employees with education and service organizations in their local communities, so that our employees have the opportunity, on Company time, to perform community service that has an impact on the neighborhoods where we live and work. The Standex CARES program focuses on four areas of influence: education; workforce readiness; humanitarian relief and community engagement.

LOGO

Unfortunately, the impact of COVID-19 meant that many planned activities were curtailed, due to the inability to send teams of employees into community spaces to accomplish projects in person. Nevertheless, many of our businesses found creative ways to remotely engage employees and support local aid organizations. We continue our efforts to be innovative and look for creative ways to help, as we eagerly plan for the time when we can re-engage in person in this program.

Additional information about the program can be found on our web site (standex.com/corporate-responsibility/community-outreach).

We will continue to work with our employees to grow these engagement initiatives.

SUSTAINABILITYAND SAFETY

During the fiscal year, the Company continued its journey toward developing more sustainable facilities. We increased our awareness and efforts around recycling, energy efficiency, reduction of waste and process improvement. Our Operational Excellence standard work processes continue to yield results for both improvements in production and employee focus on safety.

We place a particular emphasis on employee safety, with responsibility and accountability residing with each employee. Monthly safety calls with the Company CEO emphasizes this principle. We are proud of an important milestone reached this year: our TRIR fell below 1.0, a world-class metric of achievement that our employees have diligently pursued. Our footprint is global, and we continue to be aware of, and focus on, the change that we can affect when we focus on improvements to our facilities and work practices.

HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

The Board also has responsibility for overseeing the Company’s employee and culture strategy, broadly called human capital management. The Board works with the Company VP of Human Resources to confirm that all organizational needs for specific competencies are being met and that workforce strategic optimization is taking place. As part of this process, the Company has a stated goal to fill 65% of management-level job vacancies with internal candidates. Regular employee surveys are taken, which guide management conversation and planning.

MANAGING THROUGHTHECOVID-19 PANDEMIC

We have manufacturing facilities in 22 countries. We are proud of our employees, who worked diligently to keep our locations open as critical, essential manufacturers, serving infrastructure, medical and supply chain industries that are responding to the global pandemic.

To ensure consistent policies and procedures during the pandemic, a COVID-19 leadership task force developed resources for our businesses to use, along with written processes to implement all public health recommendations and respond immediately to reports of potential positive transmissions. A bi-weekly global call, during which all businesses shared best practices and practical guidance was held to support each other and manage through the pandemic.

24

2020 PROXY STATEMENT


ANTI-HEDGINGAND ANTI-PLEDGING POLICIES

The Company’s anti-hedging and anti-pledging policy prohibits all officers, directors andany officer, director or key employees from engaging in certain transactions involving the Company’s securities. Specifically, officers, directors and key employees are prohibitedemployee from engaging in the following transactions involving Companythe Company’s securities:

 

 u

short-term trading, defined as selling Standex stock within six months of purchasing Standex stock on the open market;

 

short-term trading, defined as selling Standex stock within six months of purchasing Standex stock on the open market;

short sales;

 u

buying or selling put or call options, or other derivative securities;

 

short sales;

u

buying or selling put or call options, or other derivative securities;

u

hedging transactions, such as zero-cost collars and forward sale contracts;

 u

holding Standex stock in a margin account; or

 

holding Standex stock in a margin account; or

u

pledging Standex stock as collateral without requesting approval.collateral.

For information regarding our Named Executive Officers’ compliance with such policies, refer to “Policy Concerning Transactions Involving Company Securities (Anti-Hedging Policy & Anti-Pledging Policy)” on page 4450of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

VIEW THE COMPANYS GOVERNANCE MATERIALS

You can view the Company’s governance materials, including the Certificate of Incorporation, By-Laws, Corporate Governance Guidelines and Board committee charters on the Company’s website, ir.standex.com, by clicking on “Governance” and then selecting the specific Company material. Instructions on how to obtain copies of these materials are included on page 59.Shareholder Engagement

COMMUNICATEWITHTHE BOARD

The Board has established a process to facilitate communication by shareholders and other interested parties with directors. Communications can be addressed to directors by emailing boardofdirectors@standex.com, or by writing to:

Standex International Corporation

23 Keewaydin Drive, Suite 300

Salem, New Hampshire 03079

Attention: Corporate Governance Officer

Communications with the Board are distributed by the Corporate Governance Officer. At the direction of the Board, all mail received may be opened and screened for security purposes. The Corporate Governance Officer uses his or her discretion in determining whether to forward communications to the Board. Communications that are unrelated to the duties and responsibilities of the Board will not be distributed. Such items include, but are not limited to:

 

u

spam

spam
u

junk mail and mass mailings

u

product complaints or inquiries

u

new product suggestions

u

resumes and other forms of job inquiries

u

surveys

surveys
u

business solicitations or advertisements

 

In addition, material that is trivial, obscene, unduly hostile, threatening or illegal or similarly unsuitable items will be excluded; however, any communication that is excluded will be made available to any independent, non-employee director upon request.

 

View The Companys Governance Materials

You can view the Company’s governance materials, including the Certificate of Incorporation, By-Laws, Corporate Governance Guidelines and Board committee charters on the Company’s website, ir.standex.com, by clicking on “Governance” and then selecting the specific Company material. Instructions on how to obtain copies of these materials are included on page 71.

 2023 Proxy Statement31


 

Director Compensation

2020 PROXY STATEMENT25


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

 

The compensation elements and amounts are established by the Board after a review of data prepared by the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant. The data and report show competitive director compensation levels for peer companies and the Company’s peer group. More information about the Compensation Committee’s independent consultant report and the methods for determining competitive compensation can be found under “Basis for Determining Executive Compensation” on page 4651.

In FY 2020,2022, the Compensation Committee undertook a review of the compensation paid to our non-employee directors relative to the Company’s peer group. Based on this review, to bring non-employeeAs the Committee typically reviews director compensation every two years, it did not perform a review in lineFY 2023. However, with the medianformation of the peer group,I&T Committee, the Compensation Committee recommended anddid establish the Board approvedI&T member fees.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION ELEMENTS

The FY 2023 compensation elements are shown in the following adjustmentsadjacent table.

Directors may choose to defer up to 100% of their annual cash retainer into the MSPP, which is described in detail under “Management Stock Purchase Plan” on page 44. The equity portion of non-employee director compensation effective October 23, 2019:was granted in the form of shares of restricted stock having a $120,000 fair market value at the time of grant, which was established using the closing price of the Company’s stock on the date of the annual meeting. These shares of restricted stock vest 3 years after the grant date, are considered beneficially owned by the director and accrue dividend equivalents, which are paid upon vesting. Upon the retirement of a director or a change in control of the Company, all unvested shares of restricted stock are subject to acceleration and immediate vesting.

 

u

an increase in the annual cash retainer from $60,000 to $70,000;

Directors do not receive fees for attending Board or committee meetings. Directors also do not receive benefits under Standex retirement plans or any perquisites.

u

an increase in the annual equity stock grant from $100,000 to $105,000;

u

an increase in the annual cash retainers for committee memberships; and

u

an increase in the annual cash retainer for the Lead Independent Director from $16,000 to $25,000.

 

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION ELEMENTS

The FY 2020 compensation elements are shown in the adjacent table.

Directors may choose to defer up to 100% of their annual cash retainer into the MSPP, which is described in detail under “Management Stock Purchase Plan” on page 38. The equity portion of non-employee director compensation is granted in the form of shares of restricted stock having a $105,000 fair market value at the time of grant, which is established using the closing price of the Company’s stock on the date of the Annual Meeting. These shares of restricted stock vest 3 years after the grant date, are considered beneficially owned by the director and accrue dividend equivalents. Upon the retirement of a director or a change in control of the Company, all unvested shares of restricted stock are subject to acceleration and immediate vesting.

Directors do not receive fees for attending Board or committee meetings. Directors also do not receive benefits under Standex retirement plans or any perquisites.

Under the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, all non-employee

Under the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, all non- employee directors are expected to accumulate shares of Company stock with a value of at least five times the value of their annual cash retainer. Until a director has the requisite number of shares, they are required to retain at least 50% of the share units they are awarded. As of June 30, 2023, all non-employee directors were in compliance with this requirement. Additionally, the Company has a policy concerning transactions involving Company securities. The policy is explained under “Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policies” on page 31. None of the directors have engaged in any of the prohibited transactions during FY 2023 or any prior periods.

FY 2023 Non-Employee Director Compensation   
    

Compensation Element

 

Value

 

Board Membership

    

Annual Cash Retainer

 $70,000 

Annual Equity Stock Grant

 $120,000 

Committee Chair Fees

    

Audit Chair

 $20,000 

Compensation Chair

 $15,000 

N&CG Chair

 $10,000 

I&T Chair

 $15,000 

Committee Non-Chair Fees

    

Audit Non-Chair

 $10,000 

Compensation Non-Chair

 $7,500 

N&CG Non-Chair

 $5,000 

I&T Non-Chair

 $7,500 

Lead Independent Director

 $25,000 

Highlights of Director Compensation Program

Emphasis on equity: ties the majority of director compensation to shareholder interests through stock grants.

Long term focus: equity grants vest after three years incentivizing directors to focus on the long-term.

Market competitive: adjustments to director compensation are based on peer group median levels and the work required of directors serving a diverse company such as ours.

Anti-hedging and anti-pledging: includes features that prohibit certain transactions involving our Company’s stock.

Stock ownership requirements: all directors must maintain equity ownership levels of at least five times the annual cash retainer and are required to retain at least 50% of the share unitsstock they are awarded.awarded until they reach the requisite number of shares.

322023 Proxy Statement 

LOGO

fy 2020 non-employee director compensationCompensation Element Value Board Membership Annual Cash Retainer $70,000 Annual Equity Stock Grant $105,000 Committee Memberships Audit Non-Chair $10,000 Audit Chair $20,000 Compensation Non-Chair $ 7,500 Compensation Chair $15,000 N&CG Non-Chair $ 5,000 N&CG Chair $10,000 Lead Independent Director $25,000

As of June 30, 2020, all non-employee directors were in compliance with this requirement. Additionally, the Company has a policy concerning transactions involving Company securities. The policy is explained under “Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policies” on page 25. None of the directors have engaged in any of the prohibited transactions during FY 2020 or any prior periods.

 


LOGO

Highlights of Director Compensation ProgramEmphasis on equity: ties the majority of director compensation to shareholder interests through stock grants. Long term focus: equity grants vest after three years incentivizing directors to focus on the long-term. Market competitive: adjustments to director compensation are based on peer group median levels and the work required of directors serving a diverse company such as ours. Anti-hedging: includes features that prohibit certain transactions involving our Company's stock. Stock ownership requirements: all directors must maintain equity ownership levels of at least five times the annual cash retainer and are required to retain at least 50% of the stock they are awarded until they reach the requisite number of shares.Table

 

26

2020 PROXY STATEMENT


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our non-employee director compensation for FY 2020.2023. Compensation information for Mr. Dunbar is detailed in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis and Compensation Tables sections of this Proxy Statement. Mr. Dunbar did not receive any compensation solely for his service as a director.

 

Name  

Fees Earned or

Paid in Cash ($)  1

   

Stock Awards

($) 2

   

All Other

Compensation ($)  3

   Total ($)  

Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash ($) 1

 

Stock

Awards
($) 2

 

All Other
Compensation ($)3

 

Total ($)

 

Charles H. Cannon, Jr.

  

 

83,875

 

  

 

105,000

 

  

 

4,348

 

  

 

193,223

 

 86,250  120,000  4,104  210,354 

Thomas E. Chorman

  

 

93,375

 

  

 

105,000

 

  

 

2,576

 

  

 

200,951

 

 102,500  120,000  4,104  226,604 

Robin J. Davenport

 91,250  120,000  -  211,250 

B. Joanne Edwards

  

 

81,500

 

  

 

105,000

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

186,500

 

 82,500  120,000  4,104  206,604 

Jeffrey S. Edwards

  

 

85,750

 

  

 

105,000

 

  

 

3,904

 

  

 

194,654

 

 84,375  120,000  4,104  208,479 

Thomas J. Hansen

  

 

41,750

 

  

 

205,795

 

  

 

4,348

 

  

 

251,893

 

 37,500  224,584  7,476  269,560 

Michael A. Hickey

  

 

11,875

 

  

 

205,795

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

217,670

 

 96,250  120,000  7,476  223,726 

Daniel B. Hogan

  

 

21,375

 

  

 

180,596

 

  

 

3,904

 

  

 

205,875

 

 


 

1

This column includes the annual cash retainer and fees earned for serving as Lead Independent Director, Chair or member of any committee, less the portion of the annual cash retainer and fees earned for serving as Lead Independent Director, Chair or member of any committee less the portion of the annual cash retainer that the director elected to defer pursuant to the MSPP.

 

 

2

This column includes the aggregate grant date fair value of the annual equity stock grant and the RSUs granted under a director’s deferment election under the MSPP. The annual equity stock grants were made on October 23, 2019,25, 2022, valued at $73.19$92.60 per share, the closing price of our common stock on the grant date. The MSPP RSU grants were madecertified on September 6, 2020,August 15, 2023 and granted on August 23, 2023, valued at $57.55$106.10 per share, the closing price of our common stock on June 30, 2020, and2023 discounted by 25% under the terms of the MSPP. Totals have been calculated in accordance with FASB ASC 718.

 

 

3

This column consists of dividendsdividend equivalents that were paid in FY 2020 which2023 that had accrued during the 3-year vesting period for the director’s previous stock awards.

 

As of June 30, 2020,

As of June 30, 2023, the aggregate number of unvested shares or share units held by each director was as follows:

 

 Name  Unvested Stock (#)        Name  Unvested Stock (#) 

 Charles H. Cannon, Jr.

  

 

3,412

 

 

    

  

Thomas E. Chorman

  

 

3,412

 

 B. Joanne Edwards

  

 

2,460

 

 

    

  

Jeffrey S. Edwards

  

 

4,076

 

 Thomas J. Hansen

  

 

6,254

 

 

    

  

Michael A. Hickey

  

 

4,975

 

 Daniel B. Hogan

  

 

5,543

 

 

    

        
Name 

Unvested

Stock (#)

 Name 

Unvested

Stock (#)

 

Charles H. Cannon, Jr.

  4,074 

Thomas E. Chorman

  4,074 

Robin J. Davenport

  2,413 

B. Joanne Edwards

  4,807 

Jeffrey S. Edwards

  4,074 

Thomas J. Hansen

  7,748 

Michael A. Hickey

  5,651      

 

Director  Independence

 

2020 PROXY STATEMENT27


DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE & RELATED  PARTY TRANSACTIONS

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board requires that at least a majority of directors either meet or exceed the independence requirements of the NYSE. These rules provide that, in order to be considered independent, each director or nominee does not have a material relationship with the Company, either directly or as a partner, shareholder, or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company. Furthermore, directors and nominees cannot have any prohibited relationships, such as certain employment relationships, with the Company, its independent auditorauditors or another organization that has an affiliated relationship with the Company.

The Board undertakes an annual evaluation of director independence. At its meeting on July 23, 2020,27, 2023, the Board affirmatively determined that each member of the Board and each nominee, (other than David Dunbar, the Company’s President and CEO), meets the independence standards. In addition, all members of the Audit Committee satisfy the enhanced independence criteria required for members of audit committees, and all members of the Compensation Committee satisfy the enhanced independence criteria required for members of compensation committees.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPSAND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

2023 Proxy Statement33


Daniel B. Hogan is the son of Daniel E. Hogan, who was a co-founder of the Company and served in various capacities with the Company, including President and CEO, through 1985, and then as a consultant from 1985 until his death in 1991. The Board determined that this familial relationship has not compromised Mr. Hogan’s ability to exercise independent judgment or to serve as a director. As Dr. Hogan is retiring from the Board on the date of the Annual Meeting, this determination will no longer be necessary in the future.

Any transaction between the Company and its directors, executive officers, beneficial owners, and their immediate family members, is monitored closely. Proposed transactions in excess of $120,000 must be disclosed to the CLO. Furthermore, in the event a transaction is completed without the CLO’s knowledge, the transaction must be disclosed in an annual questionnaire that is completed and submitted to the CLO. During the past fiscal year and all prior periods, there have not been any such related party transactions.

Additionally, the Code of Conduct requires that all directors, executive officers and employees avoid engaging in any activity that might create a conflict of interest. All individuals are required to report any proposed transaction that might reasonably be perceived as creating a conflict of interest to their supervisor and/or the CLO. During the past fiscal year, there have not been any reports of such transactions.Share Ownership

 

28

2020 PROXY STATEMENT

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports


SHARE OWNERSHIP

 

DELINQUENT SECTION 16(A)  REPORTS

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) requires Standex directors, executive officers and other persons who beneficially own more than 10% of our common stock, to file reports with the SEC regarding their initial stock ownership and any changes in their stock ownership.

Based solely on a review of the reports filed for FY 20202023 and related written representations, we believe that all of our executive officers and directors filed the required reports on a timely basis under Section 16(a), with the exception of theexcept for a Form 34 filing for Ms. Annemarie Bell, Vice President of Human Resources,Mr. Valashinas, which was delayed by one day due to an external error with the EDGAR filing system.internal process error.

 

DIRECTOR & MANAGEMENT STOCK  OWNERSHIP

Director & Management Stock Ownership


The following table shows, as of July 31, 2020,2023, the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned by each of our current directors, director nominees and Named Executive Officers (except Mr. Burns and Mr. Maschera), and all directors and executive officers as a group.

 

Name of Beneficial Owner

  

Common Stock Beneficially Owned 1

 

  

Percent of Outstanding Shares

 

Common Stock Beneficially Owned 1

Percent of Outstanding Shares

Paul C. Burns

  

 

16,367

 

  

 

*

 

Annemarie Bell

7,542

*

Charles H. Cannon, Jr. 2

  

 

25,490

 

  

 

*

 

20,286

*

Thomas E. Chorman

  

 

11,105

 

  

 

*

 

11,950

*

Thomas D. DeByle 3

  

 

70,401

 

  

 

*

 

David Dunbar 4

  

 

89,770

 

  

 

*

 

Robin J. Davenport

2,413

*

David Dunbar 3

161,962

1.37%

B. Joanne Edwards

  

 

2,460

 

  

 

*

 

6,534

*

Jeffrey S. Edwards

  

 

10,552

 

  

 

*

 

12,145

*

Alan J. Glass

  

 

7,407

 

  

 

*

 

Alan Glass

25,881

*

Thomas J. Hansen

  

 

8,545

 

  

 

*

 

12,662

*

Michael A. Hickey

  

 

3,412

 

  

 

*

 

10,626

*

Daniel B. Hogan 5

  

 

16,406

 

  

 

*

 

James Hooven

  

 

4,066

 

  

 

*

 

Ademir Sarcevic

  

 

11,883

 

  

 

*

 

26,880

*

All Directors & Executive Officers

  

 

286,136

 

  

 

2.32%

 

Sean Valashinas

9,201

*

All Directors & Executive Officers 4

310,551

2.63%

 


 

*

Less than 1% of outstanding common stock

 

 

1

“Beneficially Owned” means having the sole or shared power to vote, and/or the sole or shared power to invest the shares of common stock. The column contains stock which is, as of July 31, 2020,2023, beneficially owned by the director or executive. The column also includes shares of restricted stock units and performance share units that will be converted to common stock within 60 days: Burns (943), DeByle (1,413)Bell (3,111), Dunbar (8,300), Jeff Edwards (664)(72,168), Glass (1,543)(10,801), Sarcevic (17,160), Valashinas (3,369), Hansen (885)(1,577), Hogan (664)Hickey (1,577) and all other directors and executive officers (150)(2,468).

 

 

2

Mr. Cannon has 22,07713,751 shares held in a trust, of which he is the trustee, for the benefit of Mr. Cannon’s children.

3

Mr. Dunbar has 67,233 shares held in a revocable trust, of which he is the trustee, for the benefit of Mr. Cannon’s children.his immediate family members.

 

 3

4

Mr. DeByle hasThis total includes shares held in the Employee Stock Ownership Plan portion of the Standex Retirement Savings Plan. The number of such shares may differ slightly from the number reported on Mr. DeByle’s SEC ownership filing due to the Company’s adoption of unitized accounting for such shares under which each participant is allocated a number of units (Company shares + between 0% and 3% of their investment), rather than a defined number of shares.beneficially owned by two additional corporate executive officers that are not NEOs.

 

4

Mr. Dunbar has 46,637 shares held in a revocable trust, of which he is the trustee, for the benefit of his immediate family members.

5

Mr. Hogan has 11,258 shares held in a revocable trust of which he is the trustee.

342023 Proxy Statement
 
2020 PROXY STATEMENT29


Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners


STOCK OWNERSHIPOF CERTAIN  BENEFICIAL OWNERS

Based on the most recent Schedule 13G filings, the following table sets forth information about the number of shares of our common stock held by persons we know to be the beneficial owners, as determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 of the Exchange Act, of more than 5% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock.

 

  Name and Address

 

  

Common Stock Beneficially Owned 1

 

   

Percent of Outstanding Shares as of the
Filing Date 

 

 

 

  BlackRock Inc. 2

    

  55 East 52nd Street

   1,910,170    15.3%  

  NewYork, NewYork 10055

 

    

 

  The Vanguard Group 3

    

  100 Vanguard Blvd.

   1,323,947    10.62%  

  Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355

 

    

 

  Champlain Investment Partners, LLC 4

    

  180 Battery Street

   812,330    6.52%  

  Burlington, Vermont 05401

          
Name and AddressCommon Stock Beneficially Owned 1

Percent of Outstanding Shares as of the

Dates Specified in their Respective Filings

BlackRock Inc. 2  
55 East 52nd Street1,967,80716.4 %
New York, New York 10055  

The Vanguard Group 3

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355

1,425,98811.9 %

Copeland Capital Management, LLC 4

161 Washington Street, Suite 1325

Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428

612,8785.1 %

Champlain Investment Partners, LLC 5

180 Battery Street

Burlington, Vermont 05401

603,7915.04 %

 

1

This column shows shares beneficially owned by the named owner as follows:

         

                                                                                 
  

BlackRock

 

   

Vanguard

 

   

Champlain 

 

 

BlackRock

Vanguard

Copeland

Champlain

Sole voting power

  

 

 

 

 

1,881,308

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

12,581

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

598,810 

 

 

 

 

1,932,838

-

431,373

461,366

Shared voting power

  

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

2,181

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

8,247

90,455

-

Sole investment power

  

 

 

 

 

1,910,170

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

1,310,998

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

812,330 

 

 

 

 

1,967,807

1,406,482

612,878

603,791

Shares investment power

  

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

12,949

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shared investment power

-

19,506

-

-

 

 

2

Information on BlackRock is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by BlackRock on February 4, 2020.January 23, 2023.

 

 

3

Information on Vanguard is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by Vanguard on February 12, 2020.9, 2023.

 

 

4

Information on Copeland is based on a Schedule 13G filed by Copeland on January 12, 2023.

5

Information on Champlain is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by Champlain on February 13, 2020.2023.

 

30 

2020 PROXY STATEMENT2023 Proxy Statement

35



COMPENSATION DISCUSSIONCompensation Discussion & ANALYSISAnalysis

The following sections contain our Compensation Discussion and Analysis. This CD&A provides an overview and analysis of our executive compensation program and policies and the material compensation decisions we have made for our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and our other executive officers named in the “Summary Compensation Table” starting on page 4854. This group is collectively referred to as our “Named Executive Officers” or “NEOs.” During FY 2020,2023, our NEOs were:

 

 u

David Dunbar, President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”);

 

David Dunbar, President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”);

u

Ademir Sarcevic, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and Treasurer;

Alan Glass, Vice President, Chief FinancialLegal Officer (“CFO”CLO”) and Treasurer;Secretary;

 u

Annemarie Bell, Chief Human Resources Officer (“CHRO”);

 

Alan J. Glass,

Sean Valashinas, Vice President, Chief LegalAccounting Officer (“CLO”CAO”) and Secretary;Assistant Treasurer;

 u

Paul C. Burns, Former Vice President of Strategy and Business Development; and

 u

James Hooven, Vice President of Operations and Supply Chain; and

u

Thomas D. DeByle,Flavio Maschera, Former Vice President, CFOChief Innovation and Treasurer;Technology Officer (“CITO”).

As detailed in the Company’s Form 8-K filed on September 15, 2022, Mr. Sarcevic joinedBurns notified the Company on September 9, 2019 as CFO.

Mr. Hooven joinedthat he will be leaving the Company to pursue an alternative career opportunity. Mr. Burns committed to facilitate completion of certain projects and to ensure a smooth transition of his responsibilities. Mr. Burns’ employment with Standex ultimately terminated on February 17, 2020 as the Vice President of Operations and Supply Chain.

Mr. DeByle retired from the Company effective September 20, 2019.

BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTSMarch 24, 2023.

 

DueAs detailed in the Company’s Form 8-K filed on April 5, 2023, Mr. Maschera’s employment with Standex terminated on March 30, 2023 in connection with a reorganization of the innovation and technology function.

Business Highlights


Our 2023 fiscal year built upon the momentum we had built in 2021 and 2022 as we continued our emergence as a growth oriented, industrial operating company with solid operational execution. As a result, despite continued inflationary headwinds, we ended the year with nine consecutive quarters of record adjusted operating margins. Overall, net sales for FY 2023 of $741.0 million increased by $5.7 million or 0.8% when compared to the COVID-19 pandemic, FY 2020 consistedprior year, and income from operations of two distinct periods$171.1 million increased by $82.8 million or 93.8%. After adjusting for us. Duringa one-time gain on the first eight monthsdivestiture of a business unit of $62.1 million, income from operations of $109.0 million reflected an increase of $20.7 million or 23.4%. Adjusting for loss of revenue associated with the divestiture, we realized organic growth of approximately 5.7%, as increases in our sales to fast growth markets that we serve, such as electric vehicles, 5G, smart grid, industrial automation, commercial space and defense, more than offset the slower economic recovery in Asia. The increase in operating income reflected the increase in organic sales, pricing actions and continued improvement in operational performance. Our GDP+ growth process resulted in a third consecutive year of record sales to new applications in Electronics and the introduction of new products in most of our business units. Our balance sheet remains robust as we ended the fiscal year we sawwith a solid performance during which virtually all of our businesses were on target to meet or exceed our expectations. During the last four months, the pandemic adversely impacted our revenues and earnings. We took immediate actions that both responded to the immediate economic impact and also accelerated our strategic priority to become a more focused and higher margin industrial company — first to ensure the health and safety of our employees and then to protect profitability and the strength of our balance sheet. We continued to meet the needs of our customers, many of whom were considered to be in “essential industries” and we succeeded in delivering free cash flow of 300% of net income in the quarter. We also identified and executed cost reduction actions resulting in approximately $7M in annualized savings. We took action to convert floating into fixed rate debt, resulting in a $1M annualized cost savings. The net result for FY 2020 was a 5.5% decrease in year over year sales and a 23.8% decrease in operating income. Despite the impact of the pandemic, we still generated $56.5M in net cash from continuing operating activities and reduced ourposition with a net debt (cash) to EBITDA ratio of net debt to EBITDA to 0.8, down from 0.95 at(0.2) and an available borrowing capacity of approximately $372 million. With an acceleration of ongoing growth and development projects across the end ofCompany, we closed the prior year. We also continued to make progress in improving the quality of our portfolio. The divestiture of our Refrigerated Solutions Group resulted in a pro-forma 200 basis point increase in our operating margins; this divestiture, together with theyear optimistic about FY 2019 Cooking Solutions Group divestiture, has transformed us into a company no longer dependent on sales of standard products to the food service industry and into a more focused group of businesses selling customized solutions to high value end markets. We acquired Renco Electronics just after the conclusion of the fiscal year, which strengthens the high-reliability magnetics portion of our Electronics segment. These actions, together with the increased collaboration of our businesses in responding to the pandemic, positions us well to emerge stronger than ever from the pandemic-induced recession.

LOGO

Checklist of Compensation PracticesIn addition to the principles and objectives discussed below, the Compensation Committee strives to design the Companys compensation program to include what is considered good practices in the industry. Much like our corporate governance practices, we believe that good compensation practices increase shareholder value, strengthen our business and encourage us to manage risk properly. This checklist provides a highlight of our compensation practices:Executive compensation is tied to performanceCaps on incentive payoutsStrategic performance metricsBenchmarks determined based on peers of comparable size, complexity & industryCompensation Committee has the right to claw back awardsIndependent compensation consultantStock ownership guidelinesEncourage long-range planningCompensation Committee is comprised solely of independent directorsOur incentive programs do not encourage excessive risk takingNo hedging or pledging of Company sharesNo single-trigger change in control severance benefitsNo excise tax gross-up provisionsNo excessive perquisites2024.

 

Checklist of Compensation Practices

2020 PROXY STATEMENT  31
In addition to the principles and objectives discussed below, the Compensation Committee strives to design the Company’s compensation program to include what is considered good practices in the industry. Much like our corporate governance practices, we believe that good compensation practices increase shareholder value, strengthen our business and encourage us to manage risk properly. This checklist provides a highlight of our compensation practices:
 
check.jpg
Executive compensation is tied to performance
x
Our incentive programs do not encourage excessive risk taking
check.jpgCaps on incentive payoutsxNo hedging or pledging of Company shares
check.jpgStrategic performance metricsxNo single-trigger change in control severance benefits
check.jpgBenchmarks determined based on peers of comparable size, complexity & industryxNo excise tax gross-up provisions
check.jpgSEC compliant clawback policyxNo excessive perquisites
check.jpgIndependent compensation consultant
check.jpgStock ownership guidelines
check.jpgEncourage long-range planning and execution
check.jpgCompensation Committee is comprised solely of independent directors

362023 Proxy Statement



LOGO

Our Compensation Objectives and Principles

These principles have been established by the Compensation Committee to further the objectives and guide the design and administration of specific plans, agreements and arrangements for our executives, including the Named Executive Officers.
ObjectivesPrinciples
Align the interests of our executives with the interests of our shareholdersIncentive compensation should be performance-based
Attract, retain and motivate highly qualified executivesIncentive compensation should represent the majority of total target compensation
Pay for performance by rewarding current performance and driving future performanceIncentive compensation should balance short and long- term performance
Appropriately manage riskIncentive compensation should discourage excessive risk- taking
Provide a competitive pay opportunityLong term incentives should balance stock price appreciation and financial achievements
Promote long-term commitment to the Company via deferred equity awards and share ownership guidelines for our executivesCompensation levels should be competitive
Executive compensation should be reviewed annually

Objectives and PrinciplesThese principles have been established by the Compensation Committee to further the objectives and guide the design and administration of specific plans, agreements and arrangements for our executives, including the Named Executive Officers.ObjectivesAlign the interests of our executives with the interests ofour shareholdersAttract, retain and motivate highly qualified executivesPay for performance by rewarding current performanceand driving future performanceAppropriately manage riskProvide a competitive pay opportunityPromote long-term commitment to the Company viadeferred equity awards and share ownership guidelines forour executivesPrinciplesIncentive compensation should be performance-based Incentive compensation should represent the majority oftotal target compensation Incentive compensation should balance short and long-termperformance Incentive compensation should discourage excessive risk-takingLong term incentives should balance stock appreciationand financial achievementsCompensation levels should be competitiveExecutive compensation should be reviewed annuallyPrinciples

OBJECTIVESAND PRINCIPLES


 

INCENTIVE COMPENSATION SHOULD BE PERFORMANCE-BASEDIncentive Compensation Should Be Performance-Based

The Compensation Committee believes that a significant portion of the compensation received by executives, including our Named Executive Officers, should be tied to the performance of the Company relative to established financial objectives and to individual strategic metrics. The elements of the executive compensation program embody this principle by linking the annual incentive opportunity and long-term equity grants directly to such performance.

On an annual basis, the Compensation Committee reviews an independent report, provided by the external compensation consultant, on realizable pay for performance to ensure that our executives’ realizable pay is in line with overall Company performance and is also competitive when compared to the Company’s peer group.

 

INCENTIVE COMPENSATION SHOULD REPRESENTTHE MAJORITYOF
TOTAL TARGET COMPENSATION

Incentive Compensation Should Represent the Majority of Total Target Compensation

The Compensation Committee believes that the majority of an executive’s compensation should be “at risk,” as an incentive to drive the creation of sustainable shareholder value and align the interests of our executives with those of our shareholders. In FY 2023, our executives with those of our shareholders. In 2020, our Named Executive Officers’ incentive compensation amounted to 63% of their total target compensation, on average. The Committee believes that the CEO’s incentive compensation should be a higher percentage of total compensation given the CEO’s strategic position and responsibility to drive company performance. In 2020, the CEO’s incentive compensation was 78% of his total target compensation. The adjacent table presents the percentage of total target compensation that was “at-risk” for each Named Executive Officer, and the graph represents the mix of the Named Executive Officers’ incentive compensation amounted to 61% of their total target compensation, on average. The Committee believes that the CEO’s incentive compensation should be a higher percentage of total compensation given the CEO’s strategic position and responsibility to drive company performance. In FY 2023, the CEO’s incentive compensation was 80% of his total target compensation. The below table presents the percentage of total target compensation that was “at-risk” for each Named Executive Officer.

Name

 

Name


Percent of FY 20202023 Pay
“At “At Risk” (%)


David Dunbar

  80.2%

David Dunbar

Ademir Sarcevic

 

78.0%

68.3

%

Ademir Sarcevic

Alan Glass

 

67.7%

60.8

%

Alan J. Glass

Annemarie Bell

 

60.8%

55.6

%

Paul C. Burns

Sean Valashinas

 

60.8%

42.9

%

James Hooven

Paul Burns

 

48.7%

60.8

%

LOGO

CEO COMPENSATION MIX 22% 22% 33% 23% NEO COMPENSATION MIX 20% 37% 22% 21% Fixed Pay Base Salary At-Risk Pay Annual Incentive OIP PSU OIP RSA

32

2020 PROXY STATEMENTFlavio Maschera

 55.6%

2023 Proxy Statement37



Incentive Compensation Should Balance Short-Term and Long-Term Performance

INCENTIVE COMPENSATION SHOULD BALANCE SHORT-TERMAND LONG-TERM PERFORMANCE

The Compensation Committee believes that driving sustained shareholder value creation requires that executive incentive compensation be appropriately balanced between short and long-term objectives. In addition, the Compensation Committee believes that such balancing discourages excessive risk taking that otherwise could drive short-term results at the expense of sustained long-term performance. Our executive compensation program promotes this objective by balancing the long-term incentive components in the form of equity-based awards, such as restricted stock awards and contingent performance shares, with short-term annual cash incentive opportunities.

The value of long-term incentive components is tied, in part, to our stock price, thereby aligning executives’ interests with those of shareholders. However, the Compensation Committee recognizes that our share price is an incomplete measure of Company performance in the short term, as other factors may significantly impact stock prices. Accordingly, the annual cash incentive opportunity component of executive compensation emphasizes current or short-term corporate performance and the realization of short-term defined business and financial objectives. The Compensation Committee has determined that the balance between annual cash incentive opportunities and long-term equity incentives encourages our Named Executive Officers to focus on creating short and long-term shareholder value, while fulfilling business objectives and strategic goals.

LONG-TERM INCENTIVES SHOULD BALANCE STOCK PRICE APPRECIATIONAND BUSINESS/FINANCIAL-BASED ACHIEVEMENTSASWELLAS SHAREHOLDER RETURN RELATIVETO OTHER INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING COMPANIESLong-Term Incentives Should Balance Stock Price Appreciation and Business/Financial-Based Achievements as well as Shareholder Return Relative to Other Industrial Manufacturing Companies

Our FY 20202023 long-term incentive awards for NEOs other than the CEO are equally weighted between restricted stock awards and contingent performance shares. For our CEO, the FY 2023 mix is 40% weighted towards restricted stock awards and 60% weighted towards contingent performance shares. The restricted stock awards cliffcomponent will vest at the end ofon a 3-year service period.pro-rata basis over three years. The contingent performance shares vest at the end of a 3-year performance period based on achievement against pre-establishedpre- established financial performance criteria. With respect to FY 20202023 PSU awards, ultimate award payouts will be adjusted by a relative TSR measure over the 3-year performance period to reflect performance relative to other industrial companies in the S&P 600 Capital Goods Index. The Compensation Committee has determined that this long-term incentive mix appropriately encourages long-term equity ownership, promotes a balance between stock price appreciation and financial-based achievement, aligns the interests of our Named Executive Officers with shareholders and aids in retention of our Named Executive Officers.

COMPENSATION LEVELS SHOULDBE COMPETITIVECompensation Levels Should be Competitive

The Compensation Committee reviews market compensation data compiled and prepared by the Compensation Committee’s independent executive compensation consultant to evaluate whether our executive compensation program is market competitive. The Compensation Committee uses this data to benchmark our executives’ base salary, annual incentive opportunities and long-term incentive compensation. Generally, the Compensation Committee then sets target compensation at approximately the market median. However, the Compensation Committee considers other relevant factors in setting each Named Executive Officer’s total target compensation, including the Named Executive Officer’s scope of responsibilities and duties, experience, tenure with the Company, and individual performance as well as competitive market data, Company performance and internal pay equity. As a result, the Compensation Committee may set a Named Executive Officer’s total target compensation or an individual component of total target compensation below or above market median. By taking into account market data and other relevant considerations, the Compensation Committee is able to set each Named Executive Officer’s compensation at an appropriate level that enables us to attract and retain the highly qualified executives necessary to drive long-term enhancement of shareholder value.

THE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM SHOULDBE REVIEWED ANNUALLYThe Executive Compensation Program Should be Reviewed Annually

The Compensation Committee believes that it is prudent to review and evaluate the executive compensation program annually in light of evolving market practices, regulatory requirements, the competitive market for executives and our executive compensation philosophy. This process is repeated in a structured manner annually.

 

382023 Proxy Statement
 
2020 PROXY STATEMENT33


COMPONENTSOF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

OVERVIEWComponents of Executive Compensation


Overview

We provide three elements of total direct compensation: base salary, annual incentives and long-term incentives, which are described below. We also provide limited perquisites (see page 4349) and standard retirement and benefit plans (see page 4248).

 

CEO

Average Named

Executive Officer

Description
    

CEO

Average Named
Executive Officer

Description

Base Salary

ceobase.jpg

averagebase.jpg
LOGO

LOGO

Fixed cash compensation based on the market-competitivemarket- competitive value of the skills and knowledge required for each role. Reviewed and adjusted when appropriate to maintain market competitiveness.

Annual Incentive

   LOGO
 
ceoannual.jpg
averageannual.jpg
LOGO

Designed to reward results in the priorfiscal year. Annual cash incentives based on:

Annual

Incentive

u

Achievement of Company financial metrics

u

Individual performance on pre-established strategic goals

Long-Term Incentives

   
LOGO

Long-Term

Incentives

ceolong.jpg
averagelong.jpg
LOGO

Forward-looking equity awards intended to motivate and reward potential to drive future growth and align the interests of NEOs and shareholders. Grants awarded in the form of restricted stock awards and performance share units. Current performance measures include:include the following metrics and payouts are subject to a relative TSR modifier:

ROIC

Base Salary

 

u  EBITDA

u   ROIC

u  Modified ROIC

BASE SALARY

Base salary is fixed cash compensation. During the first quarter of each fiscal year, the Compensation Committee reviews and establishes the base salaries of theCompany executives, including the Named Executive Officers. For each Named Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee takes into account a number of factors, including the scope of the executive’s responsibilities and duties, experience, tenure with the Company, and individual performance as well as competitive market data, Company performance and internal pay equity. The Compensation Committee does not assign any relative or specific weights to these factors. Salary levels are reviewed annually and are adjusted when appropriate. Increases in base salary are not automatic or guaranteed in order to promote a performance culture.

Effective October 1st1st of FYs 20192022 and 2020,2023, the base salary of each Named Executive Officer was set as follows:

 

  Name  FY 2020 Base ($)   FY 2019 Base ($)   Increase  

  David Dunbar

   852,088    827,270    3%  

  Ademir Sarcevic

   415,000    N/A    N/A  

  Alan J. Glass

   360,500    350,000    3%  

  Paul C. Burns

   360,500    350,000    3%  

  James Hooven

   330,000    N/A    N/A  

  Thomas D. DeByle 1

   N/A    423,872    N/A  

Name

FY 2023 Base ($)

FY 2022 Base ($)

Increase

David Dunbar

900,419

869,130

3.6 %

Ademir Sarcevic

469,408

453,097

3.6 %

Alan Glass

392,376

378,741

3.6 %

Annemarie Bell 1

322,885

277,393

16.4 %

Sean Valashinas

278,460

267,750

3.6 %

Paul Burns

392,376

378,741

3.6 %

Flavio Maschera 2

384,681

371,314

3.6 %

 


 

1

Ms. Bell received an above-market raise to bring her compensation in line with comparable positions in the Company’s peer group and due to her performance.

2

Mr. DeByle did not receiveMaschera was paid in Euros, with an increase inFY 2022 base salary due to his retirement prior to the effective date of the€340,218 and an FY 2023 base salary increases.of €352,466. The dollar values disclosed here are based on the EUR to USD exchange rate of 1.0914 as of June 30, 2023.

 

34 

2020 PROXY STATEMENT2023 Proxy Statement

39



Annual Incentive Opportunity

ANNUAL INCENTIVE OPPORTUNITY

The Compensation Committee establishes the annual cash incentive opportunity for executives including our Named Executive Officers through a detailed performance planning process called the Balanced Performance Plan (“BPP”). During the BPP process, the Compensation Committee establishes (i) the target incentive amounts; (ii) the respective weight of the financial performance measures and strategic goals; (iii) the Company financial performance goals at “threshold,” “target,” and “superior” levels; and (iv) the strategic goals for each Named Executive Officer. The BPPsfinancial metrics and each strategic goal are reviewed and discussed during the course of two Compensation Committee meetings through the first quarter of each fiscal year before being approved.

2020 ANNUAL INCENTIVE FORMULA2023 Annual Incentive Formula

 

p40.jpg

 

LOGO

Base Salary Target Percentage Financial Achievement Factor* Strategic Achievement Factor* Annual Incentive Amount

* These factors are calculated by taking the goal weight and multiplying it by the goal achievement percentage. For example, if the weight of financial goals totals 75%, and the financial achievement percentage is 100%, the financial achievement factor would be 75%; if the weight of financial goals totals 75% and the financial achievement percentage is 200%, the financial achievement factor would be 150%.

TARGET INCENTIVE AMOUNTSTarget Incentive Amounts

Each year the Compensation Committee sets the target incentive amount for each Named Executive Officer, expressed as a percentage of the executive’s base salary. The Compensation Committee sets these target incentives based on a number of factors, including the Named Executive Officer’s role and responsibilities, internal pay equity and competitive market data, in consultation with the compensation consultant and in adherence to our stated executive compensation objectives and principles. The target annual incentive opportunity for each Named Executive Officer in FY 20202023 is as follows:

 

  Name  Target Annual
Incentive (% of
Base Salary)
   Target Annual
Incentive Amount
($)
 

David Dunbar

   105%    894,692 

Ademir Sarcevic

   60%    249,000 

Alan J. Glass

   55%    198,275 

Paul C. Burns

   55%    198,275 

James Hooven

   45%    148,500 

Thomas D. DeByle

   0%    - 

Name

Target Annual
Incentive (% of
Base Salary)

 Target Annual
Incentive Amount
($)

David Dunbar

105 %

945,440

Ademir Sarcevic

65 %

305,115

Alan Glass

55 %

215,807

Annemarie Bell

55 %

177,587

Sean Valashinas

35 %

97,461

Paul Burns

55 %

215,807

Flavio Maschera 1

55 %

211,574


1

Mr. Maschera’s target annual incentive amount was based on his FY 2023 base salary of €352,466 as converted from EUR to USD using the June 30, 2023 exchange rate of 1.0914.

402023 Proxy Statement


GOAL WEIGHTWITHIN TARGET INCENTIVEGoal Weight within Target Incentive

After establishing a target incentive amount for each executive, the Compensation Committee determines the relative weight of financial performance measures and strategic goals. For FY 2020,2023, the Compensation Committee set the following relative weight of these performance measures (except for Mr. Burns):measures:

 

 u

75% of the annual incentive opportunity would be based on the achievement of financial performance goals, and

 

75%

25% of the annual incentive opportunity would be based on theindividual achievement of financial performance goals, andstrategic goals.

u

25% of the annual incentive opportunity would be based on individual achievement of strategic goals.

Payout for the achievement of both financial performance and strategic goals can range between 0% and 200%, where performance below threshold levels corresponds to a payout of 0%, while performance at or above superior levels corresponds to a payout of 200%. For example, if the weight of financial goals is 75%, the maximum financial achievement factor would be 150%. Similarly, if the weight of strategic goals is 25%, the maximum strategic achievement factor would be 50%. The combined factors are capped at 200%.

With respect to Mr. Burns, the Compensation Committee determined that 35% of his annual incentive opportunity would be based on achievement of financial performance goals and 65% of his annual incentive opportunity would be based on strategic goals due to the nature of his position as head of the Company’s strategy and business development function.

Setting Financial Performance Measures

 

2020 PROXY STATEMENT35


SETTING FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES

The Compensation Committee, working with the CEO, evaluates and establishes financial objectives that correlate to the creation of shareholder value, are aligned with the Company’s annual business plan and are appropriate measures for evaluating executive performance. For FY 2020,2023, the Compensation Committee selected the following three financial performance measures:

(i) EBITDA,adjusted Operating Income, (ii) adjusted EPS, and (iii) net working capital turns. The Compensation Committee selected these performance measures because it believes they are important financial factors in preserving and enhancing shareholder value in the short-term and sustaining growth and stability for the long-term.

After determining the performance measures, the Compensation Committee sets “threshold,” “target,” and “superior” performance goals, which correspond to annual incentive payouts of 50%, 100% or 200% of the target incentive amount, respectively, except for “threshold”“entry” for the EBITDAadjusted Operating Income performance measure corresponds to a payout of 25%. If actual performance falls between two performance levels, the amount of the incentive payout would be determined through interpolation. However, no payout would be made if actual performance falls below threshold.entry for the adjusted Operating Income performance measure or below threshold for all other measures. Additionally, if adjusted Operating Income performance exceeds target, the Compensation Committee set a requirement that the adjusted operating income margin must also be at least 12.7% for payout to exceed target. The Compensation Committee included this requirement in order to prevent margin dilution. The Compensation Committee sets the “entry” and “threshold” performance levellevels high enough so that achieving the level is not guaranteed, while setting the “superior” performance level high enough so that achieving it is difficult and represents an outstanding accomplishment. The Compensation Committee may adjust the financial performance targets to reflect the impact of special events, such as acquisitions or divestitures, during a fiscal year. These adjustments are made pursuant to established guidelines and are appropriate in light of long-term growth strategies and business operations.

2023 Proxy Statement41


FINANCIAL GOALSFinancial Goals & RESULTSFORResults for FY 20202023

For FY 2020,2023, the financial performance metrics, weights, achieved performance levels and payout percentages were as follows:

 

  Financial Performance Metric Threshold    Target     Superior    Weight  

Weighted

Achievement

EBITDA 1

 LOGO  40%  10%

Adjusted EPS 2

 LOGO  5%  0%

Net Working Capital Turns

Q1 3

 LOGO  6%  5.7%

Net Working Capital Turns

Q2

 LOGO  6%  4.7%

Net Working Capital Turns

Q3

 LOGO  6%  4.2%

Net Working Capital Turns

Q4

 LOGO  6%  0%

Net Working Capital Turns

5 Point Average 4

 

LOGO

 

  6%  4%
     

Financial Goals Weighted Achievement Total

  28.7%5

Financial Performance 

Metric

Entry         Threshold         Target         SuperiorWeight

Weighted

Achievement

    
Adjusted Operating Income 1
bar01.jpg
40 %52.5 %
    
Adjusted EPS 2
bar02.jpg
5 %7.2 %
    
Net Working Capital Turns Q1 3
bar03.jpg
6 %0 %
    
Net Working Capital Turns Q2
bar04.jpg
6 %0 %
    
Net Working Capital Turns Q3
bar05.jpg
6 %0 %
    
Net Working Capital Turns Q4
bar06.jpg
6 %0 %
    
Net Working Capital Turns 5-Point Average 4
bar07.jpg
6 %0 %
    
 Financial Goals Weighted Achievement Total 59.7 %

 

1

EBITDA, which stands for earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization,Adjusted Operating Income is a non-GAAP financial measure, that is determined bywhich takes Operating Income and excludes restructuring charges, purchase accounting expenses, acquisition-related expenses and other one-time items. The target value and actual value disclosed here also excludes income earned from the sumProcon business because it was a business managed for sale for the majority of (i) income from continuing operations before income taxes, (ii) interest expense, and (iii) depreciation and amortization.the FY.

 

 

2

This value, which is greaterless than the Company’s actual reported diluted earnings per share of $3.49$11.59 for FY 2020. This value, used for the purpose of determining the annual incentive opportunity,2023, adjusts for restructuring charges, purchase accounting expenses, insurance recoveries, discrete tax events, discontinued operations, acquisition costs and acquisition costs.any income tax impacts thereof, along with one-time tax adjustments. The value also excludes any earnings from the Procon business prior to its sale, as well as the gain on sale of the business.

 

 

3

Net working capital turns measures the ratio of sales to net working capital. The ratio was calculated by using annualized net sales for the trailing three-months of the listed quarter and dividing by the net working capital (calculated as net accounts receivable and inventory minus accounts payable) at the end of the listed quarter, and dividing by the net working capital (calculated as net accounts receivable and inventory minus accounts payable) at the end of the listed quarter.

 

 

4

This five-point average included the net working capital turns for Q1-Q4 of FY 20202023 and Q4 of FY 2019.2022.

 

422023 Proxy Statement 5

Mr. Burns’ financial goal weighted achievement total was 13.4% due to differing weight of financial vs. strategic goals.

 

36

2020 PROXY STATEMENT



Setting Strategic Goals

SETTING STRATEGIC GOALS

The Compensation Committee, in consultation with the Board, evaluates and establishes strategic objectives that correlate with the creation of shareholder value, align with the Company’s business plan and are appropriate measures for judging individual executive performance. As with financial performance measures, the Compensation Committee sets relative weights and metrics for each strategic goal. The specific goals are developed based on the individual nature of an executive’s role and responsibilities.

In FY 2020,2023, the Compensation Committee set the following strategic goals for the CEO:

 

 u

Using organic and inorganic actions, deploy the Company’s resources to position Standex to grow sales faster than the rate in our long-range plan;

 

Deliver $55M sales from growth laneways; improve accountability

Apply the standard work of the Standex Growth Disciplines, OpEx, Talent Management and management’s processBPP across the entire Company to reduce forecast misses by 25%; implement an annual Kaizen event plan for sites with > 50 employees; achieve TRIR of 1.1 or better;create a high performance and scalable operating model;

 u

Divest non-core businesses to increase focus of remaining business where Standex can create the most shareholder value; acquire accretive strategic bolt-on acquisitions; and

 

Attempt

Implement a robust sustainability and ESG strategy to close two or more strategic bolt-on acquisitions with IRR > 15%; initiate divestiture activity on at least one portfolio business; execute portfolio moves such that quality of earningsincrease business resilience and growth profile of thehelp improve overall Company is improved; andperformance.

u

Successfully onboard new CFO; achieve internal fill rate of 65%.

In consultation with the CEO, the Compensation Committee sets strategic goals for executive officers, including the other Named Executive Officers, that are tied to the completion of specific projects in their functional areas. These projects are important to the Company in that they improve productivity and significantly lower the cost structures of the respective departments, resulting in better processes and reduced costs.

STRATEGIC GOALSStrategic Goals & RESULTSFORResults for FY 20202023

The Compensation Committee met with the CEO to evaluate the performance of each Named Executive Officer (other than the CEO) against their strategic goals. To determine the extent to which each strategic goal was met, the Compensation Committee evaluated several factors including the difficulty of reaching the goal, the work performed to achieve the goal, the quality of the work performed and other factors that influenced the ease or difficulty of meeting the goal. Additionally, the Compensation Committee took into consideration the quality of management’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic and the rapid actions taken to ensure employee safety and mitigate the adverse financial impact to the businesses. The Compensation Committee determined that each Named Executive Officer achieved greater than target on their strategic goals. For the CEO, the Compensation Committee evaluated his performance based on the response to the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the following:

 

 u

Fast growth market sales increased to $83M; year-to-date new product sales achieved $31.5M; multiple development opportunities are in process.

 

The continued deployment

Record cash flows were delivered; Organic sales growth of the Company’s Growth Disciplines resulted5.7%; Safety TRIR at or near world-class level; Actions that were implemented in an increase of > $60M in laneway sales. The implementation of a missed commitment review process reduced Q4 misses against forecast by 25% andFY23 improved net working capital turns. TRIR of 0.57targeted employee engagement scores; New Electronics President was achieved.hired.

 u

Acquisitions since 2015 have delivered ROIC > 14%; Successful divestiture of Procon business.

 

Objectives met with the agreements

ISS Environmental score improved; Sustainalytics score improved; ESG disclosures were implemented and S&P Global was engaged to purchase Torotel and Renco Electronics. The Refrigerated Solutions Group divestiture was completed successfully. The divestiture also improved EBITDA margins by 240 bps.calculate Scope 1&2 GHG emissions; environmental improvement targets were set across all businesses.

 u

Mr. Sarcevic successfully onboarded as new and effective CFO. Internal fill rate is 61%. Additional hire and onboarding of Mr. Hooven as Vice President of Operations and Supply Chain brought additional bench strength to support improvements in operating discipline.

2023 Proxy Statement43


OVERALL ANNUAL INCENTIVE OPPORTUNITY RESULTSFOR NEOSOverall Annual Incentive Opportunity Results for NEOs

The following table shows the overall annual incentive opportunity results for FY 2020.2023. Each executive has the opportunity to participate in the Management Stock Purchase Plan, described below, under which executives can defer a pre-selected percentage of their annual incentive awards into the receipt of RSUs at a 25% discount. Neither Mr. Burns nor Mr. Maschera received any portion of the FY 2023 annual incentive opportunity due to the terminations of their employment.

 

  Name  Financial
Achievement Factor
   Strategic
Achievement Factor
   Total BPP
Score
   Target Annual
Incentive
Amount ($)
   Annual Incentive
Amount ($)
 

David Dunbar

   28.7    46.3    75    894,692    671,019 

Ademir Sarcevic 1

   28.7    46.3    75    249,000    186,750 

Alan J. Glass

   28.7    46.3    75    198,275    148,706 

Paul C. Burns

   13.4    79.6    93    198,275    184,396 

James Hooven 2

   28.7    46.3    75    148,500    83,531 

Thomas D. DeByle 3

   -    -    -    -    - 
    Target Annual 
 FinancialStrategicTotal BPPIncentiveAnnual Incentive

Name

Achievement Factor

Achievement Factor

Score

Amount ($)

Amount ($)

David Dunbar

59.7 %

40.0 %

99.7 %

945,440

942,604

Ademir Sarcevic

59.7 %

45.0 %

104.7 %

305,115

319,456

Alan Glass

59.7 %

30.0 %

89.7 %

215,807

193,579

Annemarie Bell

59.7 %

40.0 %

99.7 %

177,587

177,054

Sean Valashinas

59.7 %

40.0 %

99.7 %

97,461

97,169

 

1

Under the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Sarcevic did not receive a pro-rated annual award and instead, was granted an annual incentive award at the full amount for the year.

Management Stock Purchase Plan

 

2

Under the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Hooven received a pro-rated annual award at 75% of what he would have received had he been employed for the full year.

3

Mr. DeByle was not granted an annual incentive award due to his retirement in September 2019.

2020 PROXY STATEMENT37


MANAGEMENT STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

The Compensation Committee believes that while the annual incentive award provides motivation for executives to meet annual performance goals, the Management Stock Purchase Plan (“MSPP”) adds an additional long-term component. Under the MSPP, management at a certain salary level can elect to defer their annual incentive awards into the receipt of restricted stock units (RSUs)(“RSUs”) at a 25% discount, valued at the lower of (i) the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the last business day of the fiscal year (June 30, 2020)2023) or (ii) the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date on which the annual incentive award is certified by the Compensation Committee (August 26, 2020)15, 2023). Executives must make their election prior to the beginning of the fiscal year and can defer up to 50% of their annual incentive award. These RSUs cliff vest at the end of a 3-year period and the executive receives shares of stock equal to the amount of RSUs granted. Executives accrue dividends, which are paid upon vesting, on the RSUs, but do not have voting rights until the shares underlying the RSUs are delivered. The following table details, for FY 2020,2023, the percent each Named Executive Officer elected to defer under the MSPP, the value of that deferral and the amount of RSUs granted pursuant to the deferral. Neither Mr. Burns nor Mr. Maschera received any portion of the FY 2023 annual incentive opportunity due to the terminations of their employment and thus were unable to participate in the MSPP.

 

  Name  

Annual Incentive Award

Deferred (% of Award)

   Amount of the
Deferral ($)
1
   RSUs Granted
(#)
2
 

David Dunbar

   50%    335,510    7,773 

Ademir Sarcevic

   20%    37,350    865 

Alan J. Glass

   50%    74,353    1,723 

Paul C. Burns

   20%    36,879    854 

James Hooven

   0%    -    - 

Thomas D. DeByle

   0%    -    - 
 Annual Incentive AwardAmount of theRSUs Granted

Name

Deferred (% of Award)

Deferral ($) 1

(#) 2

David Dunbar

50 %

471,302

4,441

Ademir Sarcevic

20 %

63,891

602

Alan Glass

50 %

96,789

912

Annemarie Bell

0 %

-

-

Sean Valashinas

30 %

29,151

274

 

1

The amount of the deferral is the dollar value of the deferral is the dollar value of the annual incentive award that is actually deferred into the receipt of discounted RSUs under the MSPP.

 

 

2

Based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on June 30, 20202023 ($57.55)141.47), the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the last day of the fiscal year, and discounted by 25%. RSUs have been rounded updown to the nearest whole unit.

 

38442023 Proxy Statement 

2020 PROXY STATEMENT



Long-Term Incentive Plan

LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

In 2018, the Company, with the approval of its shareholders, adopted the 2018 Omnibus Incentive Plan (“OIP”). An amended and restated OIP was also approved by shareholders in 2021. The purpose of the OIP is to align executives’ interests with those of shareholders through the annual grant of long-term equity awards. These long-term equity awards reward executives for the Company’s performance over a multi-year period. All long term incentive awards to NEOs for FY 20202023 were made in September 2019August 2022 under the OIP. Prior to the approval of the OIP, the Company granted awards under the 2008 Long Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”), which expired in October 2018. Certain outstanding award grants were made under the LTIP.

OIP STRUCTUREStructure

The FY 20202023 OIP awards consistsconsist of two types of equity awards: time-vested restricted stock awards (RSAs)(“RSAs”) and performance-basedperformance- based performance share units (PSUs)(“PSUs”). The Compensation Committee selected these equity vehicles for FY 20202023 because each aligns the interests of our Named Executive OfficersNEOs with those of our shareholders, enhances retention of our Named Executive OfficersNEOs and provides the opportunity to meaningfully increase the level of stock ownership by our Named Executive Officers.NEOs. In addition, the PSUs motivate our NEOs and reward achievement of financial metrics (and share performance) that are aligned to our long-term business strategy and build long-term shareholder value.

 

OIP Component Description

  OIP Component

Description

Awards of Restricted Stock (“RSAs”)

Time-based, annual pro-rata vesting over a 3-year period
Performance Share Units (“PSUs”)

Cliff vest at the end of a 3-year period 

  Performance Share Units (“PSUs”)

Cliff vest at the end of a 3-year period at 0% to 200% of award value based on pre-determined financial performance metrics,

and further subject to increase or decrease of up to 25% of payout based on relative TSR performance over the performance period (for an ultimate payout range of 0% to 250%).

Each RSA vests

For FY 2023 RSAs, the RSAs will vest on a pro-rated basis on the 3rd anniversary1st, 2nd and 3rd anniversaries of the grant date, provided that the RSA holder is employed continuously through the particular vest date. However,RSAs from FY 2020 grants vested on the 3rd anniversary of the grant, provided that the RSA holder was employed continuously through the vest date. The Compensation Committee adjusted the vesting schedule for RSAs granted after FY 2020 based on a review of peer practices and the perspective that pro- rata vesting is a more effective tool in attracting and retaining high potential employees. All RSAs will immediately vest upon death, disability or retirement.retirement or in the event of an involuntary termination in connection with a change in control. All RSAs under the OIP and the LTIP are considered beneficially owned by the executive, have voting rights, and earn dividend equivalents, which are paid upon vesting.

Each PSU grant cliff vests at the end of a 3-year performance period based on results achieved against Compensation Committee-approvedCommittee- approved performance metrics. Payouts under the PSU grant may range from 0% to 200% of the target award and are settled in shares of common stock. Payout begins at 50% of target for achieving threshold performance goals. If threshold performance goals are not achieved by the conclusion of the performance period, the PSU award would be forfeited and no shares would be delivered under the award. As noted below, actual achievement may be further modified either upward or downward on a sliding scale of up to 25% of payout, based on the relative TSR performance over the performance period. PSUs are also subject to forfeiture upon termination of employment during the performance period for any reason other than death, disability, retirement or involuntary termination in connection with a change in control.

Additionally, the Compensation Committee has the discretion to grant awards of restricted stock for a variety of reasons, including sign-on bonuses to attract talent and discretionary grants to retain and motivate executives.

The Compensation Committee believes that long-term incentive compensation is essential for retaining and motivating executives. It further believes that providing our executives with long-term incentives will encourage them to operate the Company’s business with a view towards building long-term shareholder value. Based on these considerations, the Compensation Committee, in consultation with its external compensation consultant, establishes (i) the target incentive amounts, (ii) the percentage of the target award that is granted in the form of RSAs and PSUs, and (iii) the performance measures at “threshold,” “target” and “superior” levels.

2023 Proxy Statement45


FY 2020 TARGET INCENTIVE AMOUNTS2023 Target Incentive Amounts

For FY 2020,2023, the Compensation Committee set the target long-term incentive compensation for each Named Executive Officer, expressed as a percentage of the executive’s base salary based on a number of factors, including the Named Executive Officer’s role and responsibilities, internal pay equity, competitive market data and our stated executive compensation objectives and principles. The Compensation Committee also set the percentage of the total incentive compensation that will be granted in the form of PSUs and RSAs based on the understanding thatSince the CEO is in the best position to drive overall Company performance, andthe CEO should have a larger portion of his long-term incentive award be awarded in PSUs.PSUs as opposed to RSAs. The Compensation Committee set the CEO’s percentage of PSUs at 60% of the target award, while the other NEOs’ PSU grants were set at 50% of their target award.

 

2020 PROXY STATEMENT39


For FY 2020,2023, the Compensation Committee established the following target long-term incentive awards, with the percentage of such award granted as PSUs for each Named Executive Officer:

 

  Name

 

  

Target Award
(% of Base Salary)

 

   

        Target Award
        Amount ($)

 

   

Target Award 
(% Awarded in PSUs) 

 

 

 

  David Dunbar

 

  

 

 

 

 

250%

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

2,130,220

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

60% 

 

 

 

 

 

  Ademir Sarcevic

 

  

 

 

 

 

150%

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

622,500

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

50% 

 

 

 

 

 

  Alan J. Glass

 

  

 

 

 

 

100%

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

360,500

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

50% 

 

 

 

 

 

  Paul C. Burns

 

  

 

 

 

 

100%

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

360,500

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

50% 

 

 

 

 

 

  James Hooven 1

 

  

 

 

 

 

0%

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Thomas D. DeByle 2

 

  

 

 

 

 

0%

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Target Award Target Award

Name

(% of Base Salary)

Target Award Amount ($)

(% Awarded in PSUs)

David Dunbar

300 %

2,701,257

60 %

Ademir Sarcevic

150 %

704,112

50 %

Alan Glass

100 %

392,376

50 %

Annemarie Bell

70 %

226,020

50 %

Sean Valashinas

40 %

111,384

50 %

Paul Burns

100 %

392,376

50 %

Flavio Maschera

70 %

269,277

50 %

 

1

Mr. Hooven was not awarded any long-term equity awards in FY 2020 because Mr. Hooven joined the Company in February 2020. Mr. Hooven did, however, receive a discretionary stock grant under the OIP as a sign-on bonus.

Performance Measures

 

2

Mr. DeByle was not granted any long-term incentive awards in FY 2020 due to his retirement in September 2019.

PERFORMANCE MEASURES

The most recently certified award forFor the FY 2018-2020 performance period was subject to the following performance metrics:

u

Three-Year Cumulative EBITDA

u

Three-Year Average Return on Invested Capital

The first metric, 3-year cumulative EBITDA, which stands for earnings before interest, tax, depreciation2021-2023 and amortization, is a non-GAAP financial measure that is determined by the sum of (i) income from continuing operations before income taxes, (ii) interest expense, and (iii) depreciation and amortization. The Compensation Committee selected this financial metric because of its direct correlation to profitability and cash flow. Profitability and cash flow are critical to the Company’s ability to complete acquisitions, invest in its core businesses, declare dividends for shareholders and improve overall liquidity.

The second metric, 3-year average return on invested capital, is the average over the three-year period of the Company’s return on invested capital. The Compensation Committee selected average ROIC as the second performance measure because it provides a means of determining whether the Company’s earnings are being invested in a way that optimizes the Company’s returns.

Starting with FY 2019 and applicable for the FYs 2019-2021 and FYs 2020-20222022-2024 performance periods, the Compensation Committee adjusted the performance metrics toset a single modified ROIC measure.measure, as calculated using the 5-point average over the last fiscal year of the particular performance period. The modified ROIC measure is modified in that goodwill is excludedcalculated by adjusting the denominator to eliminate distortion from acquisitions, andadd accumulated depreciation and accumulated amortization is added back intoand remove goodwill. This ratio reflects the calculation.improved efficiency of the Company’s operating assets to generate profits while reducing distortion from the effects of divestitures and acquisitions. The Compensation Committee selected this modified ROIC measure because it reflects the impact of CompanyCompany’s efforts to improve the quality of earnings, both organically and inorganically, andwhether they come from organic actions or through inorganic portfolio moves. The measure supports the Committee’s view that improvement in quality of earnings drives shareholder value creation. To more broadly reflect Standex value creation for shareholders. To further reflect performanceshareholders relative to other industrial companies, the achievement of the measure will beis adjusted by a relative TSR modifier over the three-year performance period. Specifically, actual awards will beare modified up or down as follows:

 

If TSR over the three-year performance period is:

 

Then:

At or above the 75th percentile of the comparator group

dir01.jpg

LOGO

The award will be increased upon a sliding scale starting from 15% to 25%

At or above the 25th and below the 75th percentile of the comparator group

dir02.jpg

LOGO

No change to the award

Below the 25th percentile of the comparator group

dir03.jpg

LOGO

The award will be decreased on a sliding scale starting from 15% up to 25%

462023 Proxy Statement


For the FY 2023-2025 performance period, the Compensation Committee changed the metric from the modified ROIC measure to a traditional ROIC measure. However, the Compensation Committee retained the 5-point average over the last fiscal year component of the measurement. The Compensation Committee changed the metric to simplify the calculation without detracting from the Company’s focus on improving quality of earnings. Additionally, while keeping the relative TSR modifier, the Compensation Committee adjusted the modifier as follows:

 

If TSR over the three-year performance period is:Then:
At or above the 66th percentile of the comparator group 
dir01.jpg
The award will be increased on a sliding scale starting from 15% to 25%
At or above the 33rd and below the 66th percentile of the comparator group
dir02.jpg
No change to the award
Below the 33rd percentile of the comparator group
dir03.jpg
The award will be decreased on a sliding scale starting from 15% up to 25%

The peer group selected for thisboth of these relative TSR modifier is the S&P 600 Capital Goods Index which the Committee believes is a reasonable proxy to measuring a broad, and therefore consistent, group of companies that will experience similar market influences during the performance period. Our NEOs, therefore, are partially compensated based on how our performance compares to similar investment alternatives when considering total shareholder return performance.

 

Status of Long-Term Incentive Plan Programs

40Performance 

2020 PROXY STATEMENT

 


STATUSOF LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN PROGRAMS

  Performance

  Period and Measure

 Performance Levels  1  Weight 

Weighted

Achievement

 Status

 

  FY 2018-2020

  

 

u  Results were certified in August 2020.

u  EBITDA and ROIC were both above threshold levels.

u  Final payout was certified at 57.2% for Company performance and individual share payouts are in the table below.

 

  EBITDA

 

 

LOGO

  

 

60%

 

 

35.6%

 

  ROIC

 

 

LOGO

 

  

 

40%

 

 

21.6%

 

  FY 2019-2021

 

  Modified ROIC

 

 

 

                LOGO

 

u  At June 30, 2020, payout was projected below the threshold level. Company performance over the remaining year of the performance period will determine the number of shares earned, if any.

u  Results will be certified in August 2021, including applying the relative TSR modifier.

   

 

  FY 2020-2022

 

  Modified ROIC

 

 

 

                LOGO

 

u  At June 30, 2020, payout was projected below the threshold level. Company performance over the remaining year of the performance period will determine the number of shares earned, if any.

u  Results will be certified in August 2022, including applying the relative TSR modifier.

   

Period andWeighted
MeasurePerformance LevelsAchievementStatus & Commentary
FY 2021-2023Results were certified in August 2023.
 1

The specific threshold, targetModified ROIC, as calculated using a 5-point average from Q4 FY 2022 to Q4 FY 2023, was greater than the superior level.
Modified ROIC
bar08.jpg
Company’s 3-year TSR ranked in the 78th percentile amongst the peer group of S&P 600 Capital Goods companies, so the TSR modifier increased payout by 16.2%.
Final payout was certified at 232.4% based on Company performance, and superior levels forindividual share payouts are in the FYs 2019-2021 and FYs 2020-2022 performance periods are not disclosed because disclosure would result in competitive harm.table below.

FY 2022-2024 awards will be certified in August 2024, while FY 2023-2025 awards will be certified in August 2025.

As certified by the Compensation Committee, the FY 2018-20202021-2023 performance period ended on June 30, 20202023 and the PSUs granted on September 6, 20172020 vested at 57.2%232.4%, for the following share payouts and value as of the date of certification:certification. Neither Mr. Burns nor Mr. Maschera received any portion of the FY 2021-2023 PSU vesting due to the terminations of their employment.

 

  Name  Shares granted on
September 6, 2017 (#)
   

Shares Vesting

(#)

   

Value of Shares

Vesting ($) 1

 

  David Dunbar

  

 

10,505

 

  

 

6,008

 

  

 

347,732

 

  Ademir Sarcevic 2

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

  Alan J. Glass

  

 

1,852

 

  

 

1,059

 

  

 

61,315

 

  Paul C. Burns

  

 

1,301

 

  

 

744

 

  

 

43,073

 

  James Hooven 3

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

  Thomas D. DeByle 4

  

 

3,364

 

  

 

1,413

 

  

 

81,804

 

 Shares granted onSharesValue of Shares

Name

September 6, 2020 (#)

Vesting (#)

Vesting ($) 1

David Dunbar

27,709

64,395

10,541,462

Ademir Sarcevic

7,012

16,295

2,667,492

Alan Glass

3,907

9,079

1,486,232

Annemarie Bell

1,339

3,111

509,271

Sean Valashinas

1,275

2,963

485,043

 

1

Based on the stock price on the date the Compensation Committee certified the award, August 26, 202015, 2023 ($57.88)163.70).

 

 2

Mr. Sarcevic joined the Company in September 2019 and was not granted any shares for this performance period.

2023 Proxy Statement47

 

3

Mr. Hooven joined the Company in February 2020 and was not granted any shares for this performance period.


 

4

Due to Mr. DeByle’s retirement, and under the terms of the PSU grant, the PSUs awarded in 2017 vested on a pro-rated basis (73.5%), reflecting the duration of Mr. DeByle’s employment during the performance period (approximately 27 out of 36 months).

Retirement Plans

 

Standex Retirement Savings Plan

 

2020 PROXY STATEMENT41


RETIREMENT PLANS

STANDEX RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN

The Company offers a qualified savings and investment 401(k) plan to most of our non-production U.S.-based employees, including our Named Executive Officers.Officers, other than Mr. Maschera, who is an Italian citizen. This plan provides eligible employees an opportunity to save for retirement on both a pre-tax and after-tax basis up to 100% of their eligible pay subject to annual IRS limits. The Company provides eligible employees with a matching contribution equal to:

 

 u

100% of the employee’s contribution for the first 3% of the employee’s total compensation (base salary plus annual incentive award); and

 u

50% of the employee’s contribution for the next 2%.

The Named Executive Officers, other than Mr. Maschera, as well as employees who are at a location that is covered by the now-frozennow- frozen Standex Pension Plan (see below), receive an additional 1% of their eligible pay as a Company contribution regardless of the amount of the employee’s contribution. Some employees receive an additional sliding scale age-based Company contribution if they were employed with the Company on December 31, 2007 and were of a certain age. All eligible employees are immediately 100% vested in all contributions to this plan.

STANDEX DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLANStandex Deferred Compensation Plan

The Standex Deferred Compensation Plan is a non-qualified, “top hat” and unfunded plan maintained for the purpose of permitting a select group of management and highly compensated employees, including Named Executive Officers, other than Mr. Maschera and Mr. Valashinas, to continue saving for retirement once they can no longer make contributions to the Retirement Savings Plan. If a highly compensated employee reaches the IRS compensation limit for the Retirement Savings Plan, the Deferred Compensation Plan allows the employee to continue to save for retirement under nearnearly identical terms. Eligible employees may defer up to 50% of their base salaries and 100% of their annual bonuses that combined exceed the IRS compensation limit. All Company contributions (match and non-match) are made on the same basis as the Retirement Savings Plan described above.

Deferral elections must be made by December 31st31st of each year for the upcoming calendar year and all deferral elections are irrevocable. All eligible employees are immediately 100% vested in all contributions to this plan. Employees may elect the timing and form of distribution of the accrued benefits provided that the accrued benefit is greater than $10,000. For accrued benefits of less than $10,000, the distribution will be paid in a lump sum. Distributions will be paid no sooner than six months after termination of employment for our Named Executive Officers, pursuant to the IRC.Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”).

PENSION PLANSPension Plans

The Standex Retirement Plan, a tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan, and the Standex Supplemental Retirement Plan, a non-qualified defined benefit pension plan for highly compensated employees, are the Company’s two pension plans. Both plans were frozen as to future benefit accruals and new participants on December 31, 2007. All of our Named Executive Officers, except for Mr. Valashinas, became employed with the Company after this date or were ineligible to participate and are not accruing benefits under either of these plans.

 

Mr. Valashinas became employed with the Company on October 22, 2007 and was eligible to participate and accrue benefits under the Standex Retirement Plan. Since the plan was frozen shortly after Mr. Valashinas’ commencement of employment, his accumulated benefit under the plan is $839.30 and thus, de minimus.

42482023 Proxy Statement 

2020 PROXY STATEMENT



PERQUISITESAND OTHER BENEFITSPerquisites and Other Benefits

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTSEmployment Agreements

We have entered into employment agreements with each of the Named Executive Officers. Even though each Named Executive Officer has an employment agreement which sets out an initial term that automatically renews, the executives serve at the will of the Board because the agreements may be terminated for any reason with 30 days’ notice.notice, except for Mr. Maschera, whose particular situation is described below. All of the provisions within the employment agreements were crafted to consider the needs of the Company and the executive’s specific circumstances. The Compensation Committee believes that the employment agreements are an important tool to attract and retain highly qualified executives in a competitive marketplace, while also protecting the Company in the event of an executive’s termination.

In addition to severance provisions, our employment agreements also contain restrictive covenants including a non-compete provision, which precludes an executive from engaging, in any active capacity, in any business other than Standex while they are employed with the Company. This term is vital to ensure that an executive’s attention and focus during their employment is solely on the Company’s business. The non-compete also precludes the executives from engaging in a business that is competitive with the Company. The non-compete clause also contains a non-poaching provision, which restricts a departing executive’s ability to hire then-current employees of the Company. These terms are beneficial to the Company because they safeguard against executives, who know the most about the Company, its businesses, its employees and its markets, using their knowledge to adversely impact the Company after their employment ends.

Until Mr. Maschera’s termination, he had an employment agreement with the Company that incorporated the above aspects. Additionally, Mr. Maschera is an Italian citizen and the employment relationship between Mr. Maschera and the Company was governed by the Contratto Collettivo Nazionale di Lavoro dei Dirigenti Industria (the “Italian NCBA”) and Italian law. Notice periods, severance in lieu of notice, restrictions on termination, and various termination/severance scenarios are prescribed by the Italian NCBA and Italian law. Due to Mr. Maschera’s termination of employment, a settlement agreement was entered into between Mr. Maschera and the Company on June 30, 2023. In exchange for certain payments, as described in more detail in footnote 4 to the “Summary Compensation Table” on PERQUISITESpage 56, Mr. Maschera released all claims in connection with the termination of his employment and agreed to a 2-year non-compete.

Perquisites

We provide a limited number of perquisites to certain Named Executive Officers, including the CEO. The Compensation Committee designed these perquisites to be competitive and assist in attracting and retaining highly qualified executives. Furthermore, these perquisites also assist the Named Executive Officers in performing their responsibilities. For FY 2020,2023, we provided the following perquisites to certain Named Executive Officers: car allowances, reimbursement of automobile operating expenses (such as gas costs, auto insurance, maintenance and repairs), Mr. Dunbar and Mr. Maschera received reimbursement for tax return preparation and counseling services, and Mr. SarcevicMaschera also received a relocation and moving expenses allowance.travel expense allowance, as per the Italian NCBA. We do not provide gross ups for any attributed income relating to these perquisites.

CHANGEIN CONTROLChange in Control

Our employment agreements contain provisions governing what happens when there is a change in control. The benefits provided to the Named Executive Officers under these provisions, if payable, are in lieu of any other severance benefits. The Compensation Committee believes that these benefits are important to encourage the executives involved in any negotiation or completion of a change in control transaction to act in the best interest of shareholders, without regard for personal interest.

The severance benefits also promote the financial protection and security of an executive’s long-term incentive compensation arrangements in the event of the loss of their positions following a transaction that involves a change in the ownership or control of the Company. None of the severance benefits are triggered if the executive retains their position or a substantially similar position following a change in control. With equity compensation, if the executive is granted an award that substantially mirrors their then-current award, there is no acceleration of that current equity award. This “double trigger” only provides for a payment of benefits if (i) there is a change in control and (ii) the executive is involuntarily terminated or resigns for a specified “good reason.” The Compensation Committee believes that this is appropriate because if an executive retains their position following a change in control, the impact on the executive is not significant enough to warrant the provision of benefits.

The severance benefits include a lump sum payment equal to a multiple of the executive’s annual base salary and annual incentive bonus, accelerated vesting of all outstanding equity awards under the LTIP or OIP and RSUs under the MSPP and a continuation of life insurance and medical plan benefits for a specified period of time. The Compensation Committee believes that these terms and amounts are customary and reasonable. The Compensation Committee, in consultation with its compensation consultant, periodically reviews these terms to evaluate both their effectiveness and competitiveness.

More detailed information concerning the trigger events and the severance benefits of each Named Executive Officer is discussed below under “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” starting on page 5462.

 

 

2023 Proxy Statement49
2020 PROXY STATEMENT43


OTHER COMPENSATION INFORMATION

 

CEO PAY RATIO DISCLOSUREOther Compensation Information


As required by the SEC rules, we are providing the following information to show the ratio between the annual total compensation of our CEO in FY 2020 and the annual total compensation of the median employee of the Company. The determination date for identifying the median employee was June 30, 2020.Say-on-Pay

As of June 30, 2020, Standex has approximately 3,836 employees in 62 locations across 22 countries. With our global footprint, a majority (approximately 69%) of our employee population is located outside of the United States. In line with the customary nature of manufacturing organizations, a large segment of our employees is operations-based and paid on an hourly basis (approximately 62%). The median annual total compensation disclosed below is based on the Company’s global workforce and is not designed to capture the median compensation of the Company’s US employees. In order to attract and retain employees globally, we pay what we believe to be market competitive rates in each market where we operate. Our pay ratio below is a reasonable estimate that has been calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K using the data and assumptions summarized below.

We are using a different median employee from the person that was identified in our FY 2019 Proxy Statement. Since June 30, 2019, the date that we identified our last median employee, the Company has experienced significant changes in its employee population due to the April 2020 divestiture of the Refrigerated Solutions Group, which resulted in a decrease of approximately 600 US employees and changed our median employee compensation.

For FY 2020, the median annual total compensation of all employees of the Company and its subsidiaries was $46,094. Our CEO’s annual total compensation for FY 2020, as reported and detailed in the Summary Compensation Table was $4,004,684. Based on this information, the ratio of these two annual total compensations was estimated to be 87 to 1.

This ratio was calculated by first identifying the median employee using our global employee population as of June 30, 2020, which included all global full-time, part-time and temporary employees, including newly hired employees, that were employed on that date. In determining our median employee, we used base annual salary during the period from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. All international employees’ base annual salaries were converted to USD from local currencies using exchange rates for the month ending June 30, 2020. We determined that the median employee was a full-time, hourly employee in our Engraving division, located in the United States. We then calculated the employee’s total compensation in accordance with Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Reg. S-K.

SAY-ON-PAY

Stockholders are afforded the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on an annual basis with respect to the total compensation of our Named Executive Officers. At the 20192022 annual meeting, 96.1%98.1% of the votes cast on the advisory proposal were voted in its favor. After reviewing the results, the Compensation Committee decided to continue to apply the same general philosophy, compensation objectives and governing principles that it used in FY 2019.2022.

CLAWBACK PROVISIONClawback Provision

In the event that the Company’s financial results for any reporting period require restatement so that the period’s financial performance measures are not met, and the restatement is necessary due to the executives’ misconduct, the OIP and LTIP givegives our Board the discretion and authority to “claw-back” or cancel unpaid annual and long-term incentive awards and to recover excess annual and long-term incentive awards that have been paid to any executive officer. The Compensation Committee adopted a new clawback policy in July 2023 to be in line with new SEC rules and forthcoming NYSE guidelines.

POLICY CONCERNING TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING COMPANY SECURITIES (ANTI-HEDGING POLICYPolicy Concerning Transactions Involving Company Securities (Anti-Hedging Policy & ANTI-PLEDGING POLICY)Anti-Pledging Policy)

The Company’s anti-hedging and anti-pledging policy prohibits all named executive officersNamed Executive Officers from engaging in certain transactions involving the Company’s securities. Specifically, they are prohibited from engaging in transactions that are intended to offset, in whole or in part, potential loss in value of Company securities. These transactions include, but are not limited to, hedging transactions, buying or selling put or call options, and short sales. In addition, the policy prohibits pledging Company securities without first providing at least two weeks’ advance notice explaining the purpose of the pledge.securities. No Named Executive Officer has entered into any such prohibited transaction.

 

44

2020 PROXY STATEMENT

Stock Ownership Guidelines


STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

The Compensation Committee believes that Company executives, including the Named Executive Officers, should have at least a minimum level of Company stock ownership to align their interests with those of Company shareholders. The Compensation Committee has adopted stock ownership guidelines through a competitive analysis prepared by management and reviewed by the compensation consultant. These guidelines require the CEO to maintain stock ownership valued at five times his or her base salary and require all other executives to maintain stock ownership valued at two times their base salary. Additionally, the guidelines require all non-executive Vice Presidents, Group Presidents and Division Presidents to maintain stock ownership valued at one times their base salary. Until an executive has attained the requisite stock ownership level, the executive is expected to retain at least 50% of the shares they are awarded, net of amounts required to pay taxes. To determine if the guideline amount is met, shares are valued at the average stock price during the 4th4th quarter of the prior fiscal year. Shares that are either owned outright or are unvested RSAs are considered owned for the purpose of the guidelines. Neither PSUs awarded under the OIP or the LTIP nor RSUs granted pursuant to a deferral under the MSPP are considered in the calculation of stock ownership.

The required amount under the guidelines is recalculated annually or whenever an executive receives an increase in pay. The Compensation Committee monitors compliance with these stock ownership guidelines on an ongoing basis. The following table shows the stock ownership requirements for each Named Executive Officer, except Mr. DeByle, who is no longer employed with the Company, as of their most recent Form 4 filing.Officer.

 

 Name  

Stock Ownership Guideline Amount

(% of Annual Base Salary)

   Required Ownership
on June 30, 2020 (#) 1
  

Actual Stock  

Ownership (#)  

 David Dunbar 2

  

 

500%

 

  

84,066

  

83,762  

 Ademir Sarcevic 3

  

 

200%

 

  

16,377

  

11,883  

 Alan J. Glass 4

  

 

200%

 

  

14,227

  

9,493  

 Paul C. Burns

  

 

200%

 

  

14,227

  

15,623  

 James Hooven 5

  

 

200%

 

  

13,023

  

4,066  

 Stock Ownership  
 Guideline Amount (% of AnnualRequired Ownership onActual Stock Ownership as

Name

Base Salary)

June 30, 2023 (#) 1

of June 30, 2023 (#)

David Dunbar

500 %

34,100

89,794

Ademir Sarcevic

200 %

7,111

9,720

Alan Glass

200 %

5,944

17,780

Annemarie Bell

200 %

4,891

4,431

Sean Valashinas

200 %

4,218

5,832

 

1

Based on the average price of the Company’s common stock between April 1, 20202023 and June 30, 20202023 ($50.68)132.03). Shares have been rounded to the nearest whole share.

 

2

Mr. Dunbar has retained at least 50% of all shares awarded to him since his employment with the Company commenced.

3

Mr. Sarcevic has retained at least 50% of all shares awarded to him since his employment with the Company commenced.

4

Mr. Glass has retained at least 50% of all shares awarded to him since his employment with the Company commenced.

5

Mr. Hooven has retained at least 50% of all shares awarded to him since his employment with the Company commenced.

502023 Proxy Statement
 
2020 PROXY STATEMENT45


Basis for Determining Executive Compensation


BASISFOR DETERMINING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

The Compensation Committee uses a multi-faceted approach to designing the executive compensation program. The approach includes the use of the independent compensation consultant to advise the Compensation Committee on the selection of an appropriate peer group, analysis of the peer group’s practices and compensation levels and recommendations for the Compensation Committee to consider. Compensation levels for specific executives are based on various factors, including the executive’s experience, individual accomplishments and the breadth of the executive’s organizational responsibilities. The Compensation Committee discusses the program with the CEO and the VP ofChief Human Resources Officer to determine the effectiveness of the program in terms of achieving our stated objectives, including whether the current program is achieving desired motivational effects and properly incentivizing the executives.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION CONSULTANTExecutive Compensation Consultant

In FY 2020,2023, the Compensation Committee retained the same independent compensation consultant, Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (“Meridian”), which has assisted the Compensation Committee since 2015. Meridian is an internationally recognized executive compensation consulting firm. No other compensation consultant was engaged in FY 2020.2023.

Meridian was retained to assist the Compensation Committee in the development of a compensation peer group and to advise the Compensation Committee on our existing executive compensation program. Meridian provided research, data analyses, survey information and design expertise as part of its services. Meridian also notified the Compensation Committee of regulatory developments and market trends relating to executive compensation practices. Meridian did not determine noror recommend the exact amount of compensation for any Named Executive Officer. From time to time, Meridian also performs an analysis of independent director compensation.

For FY 2020,2023, Meridian conducted a competitive assessment of our executive compensation program (including design, features and target pay opportunities) against our compensation peer group. Based on Meridian’s assessment, the Compensation Committee determined that our executive compensation program is reasonable and appropriate when compared to our peer group.

The Compensation Committee, in determining whether to continue retaining Meridian for FY 2020,2023, assessed Meridian’s independence under the NYSE’s listing standards. Meridian provided the Compensation Committee with confirmation of its independent status under the NYSE’s standards. As such, the Compensation Committee believes that Meridian is independent and that there is no conflict of interest between Meridian and the Company, the Company executives, the Compensation Committee or its members.

PEER GROUPPeer Group

The following selection criteria were used to establish the Company’s FY 20202023 compensation peer group:

 

 u

The company should be an industrial and technology manufacturing company;

 

The company should be an industrial and technology manufacturing company;

u

The company should have revenues between 13 and 1/3 and 3 times the Company’s revenue;

 u

The company should have multiple business units; and

The company should have multiple business units; andserve global markets.

u

The company should serve global markets.

Based on this selection criteria, our FY 20202023 peer group consisted of the following 17 companies:

 

Albany International Corporation

Enpro Industries, Inc.

Lydall, Inc.L.B. Foster Company

Altra Industrial Motion Corporation

ESCO Technologies, Inc.

NN, Inc.

Barnes Group, Inc.

Franklin Electric Co., Inc.

Proto Labs, Inc.

Chart Industries, Inc.

Helios Technologies, Inc.

RBC Bearings, Inc.

Chart Industries, Inc.

Helios Technologies, Inc.

TriMas Corporation

CIRCOR International, Inc.

Kadant,Hurco Companies, Inc.

Welbilt, Inc.TriMas Corporation

Enerpac Tool Group Corp.

L.B. Foster CompanyKadant, Inc.

 

The Compensation Committee, with Meridian’s assistance, routinely reviews the selection criteria and the peer group companies to achieve a relative size positioning that is within a competitive range of median, that is, between the 40th40th and 60th60th percentile of the peer group companies. As a result of the comprehensive analysis for

For FY 2020, 5 companies2023 compensation, Lydall, Inc. and Welbilt, Inc. were removed and replaced, based largely on those companies no longer meetingfrom the FY 2022 peer group due to actual or pending acquisitions. In April 2023, the Compensation Committee reviewed the peer group criteria, while 5 companies were added (one such company, Milacron Holdings Corp. wasand, for FY 2024, removed Altra Industrial Motion Corporation, due to it being acquired, during FY 2020 and does not appear above).

With the divestiture of the Refrigerated Solutions Group, the Company’s relative size positioning withinFranklin Electric Co., Inc., due to business fit and revenue range. Since this brought the peer group fell below the 40th percentile, so for FY 2021, twodown to 15 companies, (Hurco Companies,4 additional companies were then added (Astronics Corporation; Columbus McKinnon Corporation; CTS Corporation; and Vishay Precision Group, Inc. and Proto Labs, Inc.) are being added to our compensation peer group..

 

46 

2020 PROXY STATEMENT2023 Proxy Statement

51


Risk in Compensation Programs


RISKIN COMPENSATION PROGRAMS

 

The Compensation Committee regularly monitors and reviews the executive compensation program to determine the program’s effectiveness at achieving the stated objectives and principles. In August 2020,2023, the Compensation Committee conducted its annual review of the executive compensation policies and practices and assessed whether the current incentives could lead to excessive or inappropriate risk taking by the executives. Following the review, the Compensation Committee concluded that the Company’s executive compensation program elements, when considered both separately and as a whole, are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. In reaching this conclusion, the Compensation Committee noted the following factors:

 

 u

Compensation elements are mixed.The executive compensation program has a balanced mix of base salary, annual cash incentive awards and long-term equity incentive awards. The executivemix between the elements decreases the dependency on one form of compensation program has a balanced mix of base salary, annual cashover other forms and thus provides executives with an incentive awardsto perform at high levels, both in the short-term and long-term equity incentive awards. The mix between the elements decreases the dependency on one form of compensation over other forms and thus provides executives with an incentive to perform at high levels, both in the short-term and long-term.

 u

Incentive award metrics contain both short and long-term goals.The annual incentive award is contingent upon the attainment of pre-established short-term corporate, business and financial objectives, while the long-term incentive award is based on long-term stock growth as well as the attainment of financial performance goals. This balance between short and long-term goals reduces the incentive to prioritize short-term corporate, business and financial objectives, whileperformance at the expense of long-term incentive award is based on long-term stock growth as well as the attainment of financial performance goals. This balance between short and long-term goals reduces the incentive to prioritize short-term performance at the expense of long-term growth.

 u

Short-term and long-term performance metrics differ. The performance metrics used to determine the amount of annual incentive awards are different than the performance metrics used to determine the amount of annuallong-term incentive awards are different thanawards. This helps avoid excessive risk-taking to achieve one performance objective at the performance metrics used to determine the amountdetriment of long-term incentive awards. This helps avoid excessive risk-taking to achieve one performance objective at the detriment of other objectives.

 u

Annual incentive awards are capped.The total annual incentive award is capped at 200% of target, which reduces the incentive award is cappedto engage in unnecessarily risky behavior in any given year at 200%the expense of target, which reduces the incentive to engage in unnecessarily risky behavior in any given year at the expense of long-term growth.

 u

Long-term incentives are completely equity-based.All long-term incentive awards are paid in the form of shares and are only paid if an executive remains employed with the Company at the time of vesting. This practice aligns the executive’s interests with those of shareholders and reduces the likelihood that an executive remains employed withwill act in a way that is detrimental to the Company atlong-term stock growth of the time of vesting. This practice aligns the executive’s interests with those of shareholders and reduces the likelihood that an executive will act in a way that is detrimental to the long-term stock growth of the Company.

 u

Long-term performance metrics are based on corporate objectives. The performance metrics for long-term incentive awards are based on overall corporate performance rather than individual business unit performance. This reduces the risk that business unit performance. This reduces the riskheads will engage in conduct that inflates their business unit heads will engageperformance, but does not benefit the Company, as a whole, in conduct that inflates their business unit performance, but does not benefit the Company, as a whole, in the long-term.

 u

Incentives have performance thresholds. The annual incentive award and the PSUs granted under the LTIP and OIP have threshold payout levels, which ensures that incentive compensation is reduced or eliminated completely if the minimum performance levels are not achieved.

Compensation is benchmarked.The Compensation Committee benchmarks compensation against the peer group to ensure that the compensation program elements and payout levels which ensures that incentive compensation is reduced or eliminated completely if the minimum performance levels are not achieved.consistent with industry practice.

 u

Compensation is benchmarked.The Compensation Committee benchmarks compensation against the peer group to ensure that the compensation program elements and payout levels are consistent with industry practice.

u

Compensation can be recouped.The Board is empowered to “claw-back” any portion of the annual or long-term incentive compensation attributable to “claw-back” any portionmisconduct or financial misstatement in the event of the annual or long-term incentive compensation attributable to misconduct ora financial misstatement in the event of a financial restatement.

 u

Executives have ownership requirements. Our executives are subject to stock ownership guidelines, which require executives to maintain ownership of a certain amount of Company stock during their employment. This encourages executives to maintain ownership of a certain amount of Company stock during their employment. This encourages executives to focus on sustainable long-term growth and aligns the interests of our executives with those of our executives with those of our shareholders.

522023 Proxy Statement

 


REPORTOFTHE COMPENSATION COMMITTEECompensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation in Compensation Decisions


Prior to the 2022 annual meeting, the members of the Compensation Committee were Charles H. Cannon, Jr., Thomas E. Chorman, Jeffrey S. Edwards and Michael A. Hickey. As of October 27, 2022, the Compensation Committee membership was realigned and the members became: Robin J. Davenport, B. Joanne Edwards, Jeffrey S. Edwards, and Michael A. Hickey.

None of these directors has ever been an employee or officer of the Company. None of our executive officers serves as a member of the board of directors or on the compensation committee of any other entity that has had any executive officer serving as a member of our Board or Compensation Committee.

Report of the Compensation Committee


 

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed this Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on that review and discussion, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

Jeffrey S. Edwards, Chair

compcom.jpg

2023 Proxy Statement53


Charles H. Cannon, Jr.

Thomas E. Chorman

Michael A. Hickey

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKSANDCompensation Tables

INSIDER PARTICIPATIONIN COMPENSATION

DECISIONS

 

During FY 2020, the members of theSummary Compensation Committee were Charles H. Cannon, Jr., Thomas E. Chorman, Jeffrey S. Edwards and Michael A. Hickey. None of these directors have ever been an employee or officer of the Company. None of our executive officers serve as a member of the board of directors or on the compensation committee of any other entity that has had any executive officer serving as a member of our Board or Compensation Committee.Table

2020 PROXY STATEMENT47


COMPENSATION TABLES

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

 

The following table sets forth compensation information for fiscal years 2018, 20192021, 2022 and 20202023 for our Named Executive Officers – the individuals who served during FY 20202023 as CEO and CFO and three other highly compensated executive officers of the Company, plusCompany. Additionally, the table contains compensation information for Mr. DeByle,Burns and Mr. Maschera, who served as CFO during partboth would have been our NEOs if not for the termination of FY 2020 until his retirement on September 20, 2019.their employment prior to June 30, 2023.

 

Name and Principal

Position

 Year  Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)
  Stock
Awards
($) 
1
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($) 
2
  

Change in
Pension

Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings

($) 3

  

All Other
Compensation

($) 4

  

Total

($)

 

David Dunbar

President and CEO

 

 

2020

 

 

 

845,884

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,631,221

 

 

 

335,510

 

 

 

86,932

 

 

 

105,138

 

 

 

4,004,684

 

 

 

2019

 

 

 

821,246

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,042,329

 

 

 

240,177

 

 

 

(2,274)

 

 

 

144,820

 

 

 

3,246,298

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

797,327

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,120,875

 

 

 

357,814

 

 

 

40,012

 

 

 

112,340

 

 

 

3,428,368

 

Ademir Sarcevic 5

Vice President, CFO

and Treasurer

 

 

2020

 

 

 

336,521

 

 

 

200,000 6

 

 

 

1,218,302

 

 

 

149,400

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

93,896

 

 

 

1,998,119

 

 

 

2019

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Alan J. Glass

Vice President, CLO

and Secretary

 

 

2020

 

 

 

357,875

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

471,528

 

 

 

74,353

 

 

 

539

 

 

 

19,422

 

 

 

923,717

 

 

 

2019

 

 

 

347,443

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

426,772

 

 

 

53,226

 

 

 

231

 

 

 

14,787

 

 

 

842,459

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

337,297

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

451,045

 

 

 

77,383

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

22,303

 

 

 

888,028

 

Paul C. Burns

VP of Strategy and

Business Development

 

 

2020

 

 

 

357,875

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

415,570

 

 

 

147,517

 

 

 

7,963

 

 

 

29,250

 

 

 

958,175

 

 

 

2019

 

 

 

342,068

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

609,530

 

 

 

165,088

 

 

 

527

 

 

 

22,337

 

 

 

1,139,550

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

315,953

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

487,082

 

 

 

134,577

 

 

 

177

 

 

 

16,723

 

 

 

954,512

 

James Hooven 7

VP of Operations and

Supply Chain

 

 

2020

 

 

 

123,749

 

 

 

25,000 8

 

 

 

299,950

 

 

 

83,531

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

7,175

 

 

 

539,405

 

 

 

2019

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Thomas D. DeByle,

Former Vice President,

CFO and Treasurer

 

 

2020

 

 

 

105,968

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

5,464

 

 

 

7,748

 

 

 

119,180

 

 

 

2019

 

 

 

420,786

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

838,916

 

 

 

82,040

 

 

 

11,514

 

 

 

68,456

 

 

 

1,421,712

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

408,530

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

790,571

 

 

 

120,505

 

 

 

33,668

 

 

 

58,870

 

 

 

1,412,144

 

Name and Principal

Position

Year 

Salary

($)

  

Bonus

($)

  

Stock

Awards

($) 1

  Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) 2  

Change in Pension

Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings

($) 3

  All Other Compensation ($) 4  

Total

($)

 
David Dunbar

2023

  892,597   -   3,405,266   471,302   164,579   164,853   5,098,597 
President and CEO

2022

  869,130   -   3,435,322   675,770   -   155,513   5,135,735 
 

2021

  864,870   -   3,681,435   772,961   355,262   110,204   5,784,732 
Ademir Sarcevic

2023

  465,330   -   799,455   255,565   3,341   46,848   1,570,539 
Vice President, CFO

2022

  449,798   -   679,507   447,954   -   29,098   1,606,357 
and Treasurer

2021

  433,675   -   894,037   396,649   949   26,638   1,751,948 
Alan Glass

2023

  388,967   -   536,910   96,789   7,507   52,462   1,082,635 
Vice President, CLO

2022

  375,984   -   607,643   148,003   -   51,037   1,182,666 
and Secretary

2021

  365,907   -   675,728   171,298   7,470   33,680   1,254,084 
Annemarie Bell 5

2023

  311,512   -   225,923   177,054   126   19,689   734,304 
Chief Human

2022

  -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
Resources Officer

2021

  -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
Sean Valashinas 6

2023

  275,783   -   154,791   68,018   -   18,140   516,731 
Vice President, Chief

2022

  -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
Accounting Officer

2021

  -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
Paul Burns 7

2023

  285,088   175,000 8   392,302   -   4,688   24,155   881,233 
Former VP of Strategy and

2022

  375,984   -   451,256   265,769   -   20,164   1,113,173 
Business Development

2021

  365,907   -   413,611   316,709   -   28,732   1,124,959 
Flavio Maschera 9

2023

  292,824   -   245,835   -   -   1,312,086   1,850,745 
Former VP, Chief Innovation

2022

  348,312   -   432,713   123,056   -   14,753   918,834 
& Technology Officer

2021

  -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Footnotes on following pages.

 

542023 Proxy Statement


 

1

This column includes the grant date fair value (calculated in accordance with FASB ASC 718) of the long-term incentive awards under the Company’s long-term incentive program (RSAs and PSUs) and RSUs that an executive received pursuant to a deferral election under the MSPP. AssumptionsThe assumptions used in the valuations may be found in Note 14 to the Company’s Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended June 30, 2020 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. The assumptions used in the valuation of the RSUs received pursuant to a deferral election under the MSPP were as follows:

 

Risk-free interest rate:

1.42%4.519%

Expected life of option grants:

3 years

Expected stock value volatility:

32.0%29.47%

Expected quarterly dividends:

$0.200.28 per share

 

48

2020 PROXY STATEMENT


1 (continued)

The grant date fair value of these three separate equity awards is as follows:

 

    Grant Date Fair Value of
Annual Incentive Deferred
Pursuant to MSPP ($)
   Grant Date Fair Value of
    Restricted Stock  Awards
under the OIP ($)
   Grant Date Fair Value of
Performance Share Unit
    Awards under the OIP ($)
   Total ($) 

David Dunbar

  

 

501,001

 

  

 

852,088

 

  

 

1,278,132

 

  

 

2,631,221

 

Ademir Sarcevic

  

 

55,773

 

  

 

311,250

 

  

 

311,250

 

  

 

1,218,302 a

 

Alan J. Glass

  

 

111,028

 

  

 

180,250

 

  

 

180,250

 

  

 

471,528

 

Paul C. Burns

  

 

55,070

 

  

 

180,250

 

  

 

180,250

 

  

 

415,570

 

James Hooven

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

299,950 b

 

Thomas D. DeByle

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

  Grant Date Fair Value of Annual Incentive Deferred Pursuant to MSPP ($)  Grant Date Fair Value of Restricted Stock Awards under the OIP ($)  Grant Date Fair Value of Performance Share Unit Awards under the OIP ($)  Total ($) 

David Dunbar

  704,149   1,080,409   1,620,709   3,405,266 

Ademir Sarcevic

  95,457   351,999   351,999   799,455 

Alan Glass

  144,608   196,151   196,151   536,910 

Annemarie Bell

  -   112,961   112,961   225,923 

Sean Valashinas

  43,552   55,619   55,619   154,791 

Paul Burns a

  -   196,151   196,151   392,302 

Flavio Maschera b

  -   122,917   122,917   245,835 

 

 

a

UnderIn connection with Mr. Burns’ termination, he forfeited all unvested equity awards that he held at the terms of Mr. Sarcevic’s employment agreement, Mr. Sarcevic received a sign-on stock grant valued at $540,029, which is included in this totaltime, including all previously granted RSAs and in the Summary Compensation Table above.PSUs.

 

 

b

UnderMr. Maschera’s grants under the termsOIP are based on his FY 2023 base salary as converted from Euros to USD using the August 23, 2022 exchange rate of Mr. Hooven’s employment agreement, Mr. Hooven received a sign-on stock grant valued0.9971. In connection with his termination, he forfeited all unvested equity awards that he held at $299,950, which is included in this totalthe time, including all previously granted RSAs and in the Summary Compensation Table above.PSUs.

The value of performance-based awards is based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date. The payout for 2018FY 2021 grants was 57.2%232.4% of the target levels shown.levels. The payout for 2019FY 2022 and 2020FY 2023 grants will be determined in 2021FY 2024 and 2022,FY 2025, respectively. The probable outcome for 2018, 2019FY 2021, FY 2022 and 2020FY 2023 grants of performance-based awards was estimated at the target payout level, or 100%., at the time of grant. The following table shows the grant date fair value of the performance share units granted in 2020FY 2023 at the target level included in the Summary Compensation Table above and the potential maximum grant date fair value, includingvalue. As described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, awards have a maximum payout level of 200% and are further subject to the TSR modifier, increasingwhich, at its maximum level, can increase the awardpayout by 50%:a further 25% of payout, for a combined maximum payout level of 250% of target.

 

    Grant Date Fair Value
of Performance Share
Awards under the OIP  ($)
   Potential Maximum Grant
Date Fair Value ($)
 

David Dunbar

  

 

1,278,132

 

  

 

3,195,330

 

Ademir Sarcevic

  

 

311,250

 

  

 

778,125

 

Alan J. Glass

  

 

180,250

 

  

 

450,625

 

Paul C. Burns

  

 

180,250

 

  

 

450,625

 

James Hooven

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

Thomas D. DeByle

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

  

Grant Date Fair Value

of Performance Share Awards under the OIP ($)

  

Potential Maximum Grant Date Fair Value ($)

 

David Dunbar

  1,620,709   4,051,772 

Ademir Sarcevic

  351,999   879,998 

Alan Glass

  196,151   490,377 

Annemarie Bell

  112,961   282,404 

Sean Valashinas

  55,619   139,048 

Paul Burns a

  196,151   490,377 

Flavio Maschera b

  122,917   307,293 

 

 

a

In connection with Mr. Burns’ termination, he forfeited all unvested equity awards that he held at the time, including all previously granted PSUs.

b

Mr. Maschera’s PSU grant is based on his FY 2023 base salary as converted from Euros to USD using the August 23, 2022 exchange rate of 0.9971. In connection with his termination, he forfeited all unvested equity awards that he held at the time, including all previously granted PSUs.

2

This column shows the amounts earned in cash under our annual incentive opportunity. Some of our Named Executive Officers elected to defer a portion of their annual incentive opportunity. Some of our Named Executive Officers elected to defer a portion of their annual incentive award under the MSPP. The values of these deferrals are contained in the stock awards column and further explained above in footnote (1).

 

 

3

This column includes the above-market earnings of the Named Executive Officer’s accumulated benefit under the Standex Deferred Compensation Plan. None of the Named Executive Officers have anyMr. Valashinas has an accumulated benefitsbenefit under the now-frozen Standex pension plans.Pension Plan. The accumulated benefit is de minimus in value and thus is not included here.

 

 4

This column includes the following compensation:

2023 Proxy Statement55

 

    401(k)
Contributions
($)
   Non-qualified Deferred
Compensation
Contribution ($)
   Life Insurance
Premium ($)
   Perquisites &
Personal Benefits
($) 
a
   Total ($) 

David Dunbar

  

 

14,250

 

  

 

52,062

 

  

 

10,578

 

  

 

28,248

 

  

 

105,138

 

Ademir Sarcevic

  

 

12,671

 

  

 

490

 

  

 

1,235

 

  

 

79,500

 

  

 

93,896

 

Alan J. Glass

  

 

12,729

 

  

 

1,791

 

  

 

4,902

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

19,422

 

Paul C. Burns

  

 

12,729

 

  

 

13,940

 

  

 

2,581

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

29,250

 

James Hooven

  

 

5,887

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

1,287

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

7,175

 

Thomas D. DeByle

  

 

3,254

 

  

 

2,020

 

  

 

2,474

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

7,748

 


 

 

4

This column includes the following compensation:

 

 

 

 

 

   
 

401(k)

Contributions

($)

Non-qualified Deferred

Compensation

Contribution ($)

Life Insurance

Premium ($)

Perquisites &

Personal Benefits

($) a

Severance ($) b

Holiday ($) c

Total ($)

David Dunbar

16,500

95,707

16,236

36,410

-

-

164,853

Ademir Sarcevic

9,336

23,802

1,710

12,000

-

-

46,848

Alan Glass

15,591

18,658

6,213

12,000

-

-

52,462

Annemarie Bell

11,585

1,892

6,213

-

-

-

19,689

Sean Valashinas

15,518

-

2,622

-

-

-

18,140

Paul Burns

17,047

3,898

3,210

-

-

-

24,155

Flavio Maschera

-

-

2,714

14,086

1,262,327

32,959

1,312,086

a

Mr. Dunbar has an automobile allowance of which he used $16,613.$14,900. Mr. Dunbar also received tax preparation reimbursement in the amount of $11,635.$21,510. Mr. Sarcevic received a relocation and moving expense allowance of $70,000. Additionally, Mr. Sarcevic hasGlass have an automobile allowance of which$12,000. Prior to Mr. Maschera’s termination, he used $9,500.received an automobile allowance in the amount of €1,811 ($1,977); travel benefits in the amount of €7,480 ($8,164) and tax preparation services in the amount of €3,615 ($3,945) (as converted from Euros to USD based on the June 30, 2023 exchange rate of 1.0914). No other Named Executive Officer received total perquisites and personal benefits exceeding $10,000.

 

 5

b

Mr. Sarcevic became employed byMaschera received the following payments, under a settlement agreement, due to the termination of his employment: €285,528 in consideration of the 24-month post-employment non-compete covenant from his employment agreement payable in monthly installments from the date of termination — €35,691 of this was paid in FY 2023 and reported herein; €427,207 for indemnity in lieu of notice; €386,606 as an incentive to leave; and €20,000 for legal fees in connection with negotiation of the severance agreement. Mr. Maschera also received €287,109 as trattamento di fine rapporto. Trattamento di fine rapporto is an entitlement under the Italian NCBA and is accumulated via deferred salary payments, similar to a nonqualified deferred compensation plan. Mr. Maschera deferred €57,453 of his trattamento di fine rapporto into his pension fund, while the remainder was paid to Mr. Maschera directly. The value reported herein is converted from Euro to USD based on the June 30, 2023 exchange rate of 1.0914.

c

Mr. Maschera also received a payout of accrued but unused vacation time in the amount of €30,199. The value reported herein is converted from Euro to USD based on the June 30, 2023 exchange rate of 1.0914.

5

Compensation for Ms. Bell is provided only for FY 2023 because she was not an NEO for FY 2022 or FY 2021.

6

Compensation for Mr. Valashinas is provided only for FY 2023 because he was not an NEO for FY 2022 or FY 2021.

7

Mr. Burns’ employment with Standex terminated on March 24, 2023 and as a result, Mr. Burns ceased to participate in the Company’s annual incentive program and did not receive an FY 2023 annual incentive award. In addition, Mr. Burns forfeited all unvested equity awards he held at the time and ceased to participate in the OIP. Mr. Burns did receive the cash value of deferrals of prior annual incentive awards under the MSPP. Such values are not reported here as they were accounted for in prior fiscal years.

8

Mr. Burns received a one-time cash bonus for the successful divestiture of the Procon business.

9

Mr. Maschera was promoted to an officer of the Company on September 9, 2019.October 27, 2021, so his compensation for FY 2021 is not reported here. Mr. Maschera’s salary for FY 2023 is based on the salary he received prior to his termination, as converted from Euro to USD based on the June 30, 2023 exchange rate of 1.0914. The exchange rate used for the “Stock Awards” column is detailed in footnote (1) above. The exchange rate used for the “All Other Compensation” column is detailed in footnote (4) above. Mr. Maschera’s employment with Standex terminated on March 30, 2023 and as a result, Mr. Maschera ceased to participate in the Company’s annual incentive program and did not receive an FY 2023 annual incentive award. In addition, Mr. Maschera forfeited all unvested equity awards he held at the time and ceased to participate in the OIP. Mr. Maschera did receive the cash value of deferrals of prior annual incentive awards under the MSPP. Such values are not reported here as they were accounted for in prior fiscal years.

 

6

Under his employment agreement, Mr. Sarcevic received a cash payment of $200,000 as a sign-on bonus.

7

Mr. Hooven became employed by the Company on February 17, 2020.

8

Under his employment agreement, Mr. Hooven received a cash payment of $25,000 as a sign-on bonus.

562023 Proxy Statement
 
2020 PROXY STATEMENT49


Grants of Plan-Based Awards


GRANTSOF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

 

The following table sets forth information with respect to FY 20202023 plan-based awards granted to our Named Executive Officers for the year ended June 30, 2020.2023.

 

 

Estimated Future Payouts Under

Non-Equity Incentive

Plan Awards 2

 

Estimated Payouts Under

Equity Incentive

Plan Awards 3

All Other

Stock

Awards:

 
    

Number of

Shares of

 
 

Grant
Date

 

Action
Date 1

  

Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive

Plan Awards 2

     

Estimated Payouts Under

Equity Incentive Plan
Awards 3

  

All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock or

Units 4

 

Total

($) 5

 GrantActionThresholdTargetMaximum ThresholdTargetMaximumStock orTotal
Name 

 

Threshold
($)

 Target
($)
 Maximum
($)
    Threshold
(#)
 Target
(#)
 Maximum
(#)
 DateDate 1($) (#)Units 4($) 5

David Dunbar

               

Annual Incentive

   

 

357,877

 

 

 

894,692

 

 

 

1,789,385

 

       

472,720

945,440

1,890,880

  

OIP - PSU

 

 

9/6/19

 

      

 

9,082

 

 

 

18,163

 

 

 

36,326

 

  

 

1,278,130

 

8/23/22

   

8,465

16,930

33,860

 

1,620,709

OIP - RSA

 

 

9/6/19

 

         

 

12,109

 

 

 

852,110

 

8/23/22

    

11,286

1,080,409

Ademir Sarcevic

               

Annual Incentive

   

 

99,600

 

 

 

249,000

 

 

 

498,000

 

       

152,558

305,115

610,230

  

OIP - PSU

 

 

9/6/19

 

      

 

2,212

 

 

 

4,423

 

 

 

8,846

 

  

 

311,247

 

8/23/22

   

1,839

3,677

7,354

 

351,999

OIP - RSA

 

 

9/6/19

 

         

 

4,423

 

 

 

311,247

 

8/23/22

    

3,677

351,999

Sign-On Grant 6

 

 

9/9/19

 

         

 

7,460

 

 

 

540,029

 

Alan J. Glass

           

Alan Glass

    

Annual Incentive

   

 

79,310

 

 

 

198,275

 

 

 

396,550

 

       

107,903

215,807

431,614

  

OIP - PSU

 

 

9/6/19

 

      

 

1,281

 

 

 

2,561

 

 

 

5,122

 

  

 

180,218

 

8/23/22

   

1,025

2,049

4,098

 

196,151

OIP - RSA

 

 

9/6/19

 

         

 

2,561

 

 

 

180,218

 

8/23/22

    

2,049

196,151

Paul C. Burns

           

Annemarie Bell

    

Annual Incentive

   

 

79,310

 

 

 

198,275

 

 

 

396,550

 

       

88,793

177,587

355,174

  

OIP - PSU

 

 

9/6/19

 

      

 

1,281

 

 

 

2,561

 

 

 

5,122

 

  

 

180,218

 

8/23/22

   

590

1,180

2,360

 

112,961

OIP - RSA

 

 

9/6/19

 

         

 

2,561

 

 

 

180,218

 

8/23/22

    

1,180

112,961

James Hooven

           

Sean Valashinas

    

Annual Incentive

   

 

44,550

 

 

 

111,375

 

 

 

222,750

 

       

48,731

97,461

194,922

  

Sign-On Grant 7

 

 

2/17/20

 

         

 

4,066

 

 

 

299,950

 

Thomas D. DeByle 8

 

OIP - PSU

8/23/22

   

291

581

1,162

 

55,619

OIP - RSA

8/23/22

    

581

55,619

Paul Burns

    

Annual Incentive

 

107,903

215,807

431,614

  

OIP - PSU

8/23/22

   

1,025

2,049

4,098

 

196,151

OIP - RSA

8/23/22

    

2,049

196,151

Flavio Maschera

    

Annual Incentive 6

 

101,542

203,084

406,168

  

OIP - PSU 7

8/23/22

   

642

1,284

2,568

 

122,917

OIP - RSA 8

8/23/22

    

1,284

122,917

 

1

The date on which the Compensation Committee took action for the grant of all of the plan-based awards was 8/30/2019, with the exception of Mr. Sarcevic’s sign-on grant, which was approved on 7/24/2019 and Mr. Hooven’s sign-on grant, which was approved on 12/4/2019.22/2022.

 

 2023 Proxy Statement57


2

The amounts in these columns indicate the threshold, target and maximum amounts payable under the annual incentive opportunity prior to deducting any amounts the named executive officers elected to defer under the MSPP. Most of our Named Executive Officers elected to defer a portion of their annual incentive opportunity under the MSPP.opportunity. The annual incentive opportunity amounts are based on the achievement of specific financial performance metrics and individual strategic goals. The annual incentive opportunity metrics are discussed under “Annual Incentive Opportunity” on page 3540. Payouts range from 50% of target for the attainment of threshold levels (with the exception that achieving threshold level for the EBITDA performance metric is a payout of 25% of target) for a combined threshold of 40%, to 200% of target for the attainment of superior performance levels. If threshold levels are not met, no annual incentive opportunity is paid. The amount the executives actually received and the amounts they elected to defer for fiscal year 2020 are discussed under the “Annual Incentive Opportunity” and “Management Stock Purchase Plan” sections of the CD&A.

 

The amounts reported herein do not take into account any deferral elections under the MSPP. Prior to June 30, 2022, most of our Named Executive Officers elected to defer a portion of their annual incentive opportunity into the receipt of discounted shares under the MSPP. Such shares were delivered on August 23, 2023, and, for accounting purposes, are considered stock grants in FY 2024.

The amount the executives actually received and the amounts they elected to defer for FY 2023 are discussed under the “Annual Incentive Opportunity” and “Management Stock Purchase Plan” sections of the CD&A.

 

3

The amounts in these columns indicate the threshold, target and maximum amounts payable under the OIP for PSUs. The OIP PSU amounts are based on the achievement of specific financial performance metrics over a three-year performance period. Payouts range from 50% of target for the attainment of threshold levels, to 200% of target for the attainment of superior performance levels, subject to a relative TSR modifier, as explained in the CD&A.&A, where such modifier can either increase or decrease the payout by up to 25% for a maximum payout of 250% of target. If threshold levels are not met, no PSUs are awarded.shares vest.

 

 

4

The amounts shown in this column reflect the number of RSAs granted to each Named Executive Officer pursuant to the OIP.

 

 

5

These amounts represent the grant date fair value, as determined under FASB ASC Topic 718. For the PSU awards under the OIP, the fair value assumes performance and payout at the target level.level, and further assumes relative TSR performance at the median of the peer group and thus, does not include any modifier.

 

 

6

PursuantMr. Maschera’s annual incentive opportunity values are based on his FY 2023 base salary of €352,465 as converted from Euros to his employment agreement, Mr. Sarcevic was granted a plan-based RSA underUSD using the OIP.June 30, 2022 exchange rate of 1.0476.

 

 

7

PursuantMr. Maschera’s PSU grant is based on his FY 2023 base salary of €352,465 as converted from Euros to his employment agreement, Mr. Hooven was granted a plan-based RSA underUSD using the OIP.August 23, 2022 exchange rate of 0.9971.

 

 

8

Mr. DeByle did not receive any grantsMaschera’s RSA grant is based on his FY 2023 base salary of plan-based awards in FY 2020 due€352,465 as converted from Euros to his retirement.USD using the August 23, 2022 exchange rate of 0.9971

 

50582023 Proxy Statement 

2020 PROXY STATEMENT


Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End


OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDSAT FISCAL YEAR END

 

The following table sets forth information with respect to equity awards that were outstanding as of June 30, 2020.2023. The Company has not awarded stock options since 2003 and there are no outstanding option awards. Neither Mr. Burns nor Mr. Maschera had any outstanding equity awards on June 30, 2023 due to the termination of their employment.

 

      Stock Awards     
Name Number of Shares or
Units of Stock That
Have Not Vested (#) 
1
  Market Value of Shares
or Units of Stock That
Have Not Vested ($)
2
  Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Number of
Unearned Shares, Units
or Other Rights That Have
Not Vested (#)
3
  Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Market or Payout
Value of  Unearned Shares,
Units or Other Rights That
Have Not Vested ($)
4
 

David Dunbar

 

 

42,967

 

 

 

1,718,821

 

 

 

13,754

 

 

 

791,514

 

Ademir Sarcevic

 

 

11,883

 

 

 

683,867

 

 

 

2,212

 

 

 

127,272

 

Alan J. Glass

 

 

9,604

 

 

 

389,243

 

 

 

2,084

 

 

 

119,934

 

Paul C. Burns

 

 

11,667

 

 

 

583,055

 

 

 

2,084

 

 

 

119,934

 

James Hooven

 

 

4,066

 

 

 

233,998

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Thomas D. DeByle

 

 

1,413

 

 

 

81,318

 

 

 

1,654

 

 

 

95,188

 

 Stock Awards
Name

Number of Shares or

Units of Stock That

Have Not Vested (#) 1

Market Value of Shares

or Units of Stock That

Have Not Vested ($) 2

Equity Incentive Plan

Awards: Number of

Unearned Shares, Units

or Other Rights That Have

Not Vested (#) 3

Equity Incentive Plan

Awards: Market or Payout

Value of Unearned Shares,

Units or Other Rights That

Have Not Vested ($) 4

David Dunbar

116,214

14,656,628

62,426

8,831,406

Ademir Sarcevic

26,357

3,592,222

14,122

1,997,839

Alan Glass

19,884

2,419,416

7,870

1,113,369

Annemarie Bell

5,201

735,762

4,016

568,144

Sean Valashinas

5,855

729,705

2,228

315,195

 

1

The outstanding stock awards presented in this column include: RSAs awarded under the OIP, and LTIP, which remain subject to service-based vesting conditions; PSUs awarded in 2018FY 2021 under the LTIP,OIP, which have been earned (and are included at the earned payout percentage) but are subject to service-based vesting conditions; RSUs granted pursuant to an MSPP deferral; and discretionary RSA grants. These awards are scheduled to vest as follows:

 

Vest Date

  

David Dunbar

   

Ademir Sarcevic

   

Alan J. Glass

   

Paul C. Burns

   

James Hooven

   

Thomas D. DeByle

 

9/6/2020

  

 

15,303

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

3,395

 

  

 

4,424

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

1,413

 

9/9/2020

  

 

-

 

  

 

4,700

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

2/17/2021

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

1,626

 

  

 

-

 

9/6/2021

  

 

10,898

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

2,616

 

  

 

3,883

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

9/9/2021

  

 

-

 

  

 

2,760

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

2/17/2022

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

2,440

 

  

 

-

 

9/6/2022

  

 

16,766

 

  

 

4,423

 

  

 

3,593

 

  

 

3,360

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

Total

  

 

42,967

 

  

 

11,883

 

  

 

9,604

 

  

 

11,667

 

  

 

4,066

 

  

 

1,413

 

Vest Date

David Dunbar

Ademir Sarcevic

Alan Glass

Annemarie Bell

Sean Valashinas

8/23/2023

6,936

2,353

1,312

669

371

9/6/2023

77,095

19,031

11,844

3,469

3,709

8/23/2024

17,794

3,747

3,718

669

927

8/23/2025

14,389

1,226

3,010

394

848

Total

116,214

26,357

19,884

5,201

5,855

 

 

2

The market values in this column are calculated using a price of $57.55$141.47 per share, the closing price of the Company’s common stock on June 30, 2020,2023, less the value of an executive’s deferral under the MSPP.

 

 

3

The shares presented in this column are performance share units granted in fiscal years 20192022 and 20202023 for the three-year performance periods ending on June 30, 20212024 and June 30, 2022,2025, respectively. These units will vest if certain targets are met during the applicable performance period. See “Long-Term Incentive Plan” starting on page 39 45for more information. For both FY 20192022 PSUs and FY 20202023 PSUs, the number of shares reported in this column are based on achieving the “threshold”“superior” level of performance because our financial performance for boththe last completed performance periods through June 30, 2020 indicatedperiod (FY 2021 - FY 2023) was above superior levels. The reported number of shares assumes relative TSR performance below threshold levels.at the median of the peer group and thus, does not include any modifier.

 

 

4

The values shown in this column are calculated using a price of $57.55$141.47 per share, the closing price of the Company’s common stock on June 30, 2020.2023.

 

 

2023 Proxy Statement59
2020 PROXY STATEMENT51


Options Exercised and Stock Vested


OPTIONS EXERCISEDAND STOCK VESTED

 

The following table sets forth information about option exercises and the vesting of stock during the fiscal year. The Company has not awarded stock options since 2003, so no options are reported. The stock vested during the fiscal year represents PSUs and RSAs granted under the LTIPOIP and RSUs granted from an MSPP deferral.

 

   Stock Awards 

Name

  

Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)

   

        Value Realized on Vesting ($) 1

 

David Dunbar

  

 

12,981

 

  

 

614,581

 

Ademir Sarcevic

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

Alan J. Glass

  

 

2,021

 

  

 

119,208

 

Paul C. Burns

  

 

2,272

 

  

 

122,448

 

James Hooven

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

Thomas D. DeByle

  

 

15,513

 

  

 

627,787

 

  Stock Awards
 

Name

Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)

Value Realized on Vesting ($) 1

David Dunbar

 

49,022

3,997,020

Ademir Sarcevic

 

13,303

1,152,477

Alan Glass

 

8,669

696,743

Annemarie Bell

 

2,024

176,382

Sean Valashinas

 

2,291

187,889

Paul Burns

 

8,436

688,768

Flavio Maschera

 

4,732

363,968

 

1

The value realized on vesting for the three stock categories was calculated as follows. For PSUs and RSAs granted under the LTIPOIP that vested during the year, the number of shares that vested was multiplied by the closing price of our stock on the vest date. For RSUs issued pursuant to an MSPP deferral that vested during the year, the number of shares that vested was multiplied by the closing price of our stock on the vest date. For RSUs issued pursuant to an MSPP deferral that vested duringdate less the year,value the number of shares that vested was multiplied byexecutive paid under the closing price of our stock on the vest date less the value the executive paid under the deferral.

PENSION BENEFITSPension Benefits


 

The Company’s two pensionspension plans, the Standex Retirement Plan and the Standex Supplemental Retirement Plan, were frozen as to future benefit accruals and new participants on December 31, 2007. All of our Named Executive Officers, except for Mr. Valashinas, became employed with the Company after this date or were ineligible to participate and are not accruing benefits under either of these plans.

 

Mr. Valashinas became employed with the Company on October 22, 2007 and was eligible to participate and accrue benefits under the Standex Retirement Plan. Since the plan was frozen shortly after Mr. Valashinas’ commencement of employment, his accrued benefit under the plan is $839.30 and thus is de minimus.

52602023 Proxy Statement 

2020 PROXY STATEMENT


NonQualified Deferred Compensation


NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

 

The following table contains compensation information relating to the Company’s nonqualified deferred compensation plan. For a description of the Standex Deferred Compensation Plan, including material factors, see “Standex Deferred Compensation Plan” on page 4248.

 

Name  Executive
Contributions in
Last FY ($)
1
   Registrant
Contributions in
Last FY ($)
2
   Aggregate Earnings
in Last FY ($)
3
   Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
   Aggregate Balance
at Last FYE ($)
4
 

David Dunbar

  

 

52,062

 

  

 

52,062

 

  

 

97,609

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

882,393

 

Ademir Sarcevic

  

 

-

 

  

 

490

 

  

 

(18)

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

472

 

Alan J. Glass

  

 

-

 

  

 

1,791

 

  

 

770

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

19,105

 

Paul C. Burns

  

 

13,940

 

  

 

13,940

 

  

 

8,736

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

63,852

 

James Hooven

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

Thomas D. DeByle

  

 

-

 

  

 

2,020

 

  

 

5,681

 

  

 

451,565

 

  

 

-

 

Name

Executive

Contributions in

Last FY ($) 1

Registrant

Contributions in

Last FY ($) 2

Aggregate Earnings

in Last FY ($) 3

Aggregate

Withdrawals/

Distributions

Aggregate Balance

at Last FYE ($) 4

David Dunbar

95,707

95,707

247,041

-

1,721,542

Ademir Sarcevic

44,502

23,802

7,408

-

84,891

Alan Glass

67,358

18,658

15,895

-

175,103

Annemarie Bell

-

1,892

257

-

2,725

Sean Valashinas

-

-

-

-

-

Paul Burns

-

3,898

4,924

43,678

-

Flavio Maschera

-

-

-

-

-

 

1

All amounts in this column are included in the salary and non-equity incentive plan compensation columns of the “Summary Compensation Table” above.

 

 

2

All amounts in this column are included in the other compensation column and detailed in footnote (4) of the “Summary Compensation Table” above.

 

 

3

The amount of aggregate earnings is reported in the change in pension value and nonqualified deferred compensation plans column of the Summary“Summary Compensation TableTable” to the extent the aggregate earnings exceeded 120% of the applicable federal rate or a loss was reported. The reported amounts are as follows:

 

 Above-Market Earnings Reported in the Summary Compensation Table ($)
David Dunbar164,579

David DunbarAdemir Sarcevic

3,341
Alan Glass7,507
Annemarie Bell126
Sean Valashinas-
Paul Burns4,688
Flavio Maschera -

 

4

86,932

Ademir Sarcevic

-

Alan J. Glass

539

Paul C. Burns

7,963

James Hooven

-

Thomas D. DeByle

5,464

4

The aggregate balance includes amounts that were reported in previous Summary Compensation Tables as follows, and also includes the contributions made in September 2018 that were not properly credited until September 2019, along with interest income that was credited in September 2019 due to the administrative error:follows:

Amounts Previously Reported ($)
David Dunbar1,468,194
Ademir Sarcevic11,159
Alan Glass84,838
Annemarie Bell-
Sean Valashinas-
Paul Burns92,175
Flavio Maschera-

2023 Proxy Statement61

 

    Amounts Previously Reported ($)   Credited Contribution ($)   Credited Interest ($) 

David Dunbar

  

 

586,281

 

  

 

35,795

 

  

 

895

 

Ademir Sarcevic

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

Alan J. Glass

  

 

15,500

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

Paul C. Burns

  

 

26,191

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

James Hooven

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

Thomas D. DeByle

  

 

404,353

 

  

 

12,055

 

  

 

251

 


 

2020 PROXY STATEMENT53

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control


POTENTIAL PAYMENTSUPON TERMINATIONOR CHANGEIN CONTROL

 

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTSEmployment Agreements

The following table lists the compensation and benefits that an executive would generally be provided in various scenarios involving a termination of employment. The amounts denoted in the table are for the CEO, Mr. Dunbar. Where the amounts or time periods differ between Mr. Dunbar and the other executives, the differences are explained in a footnote.

 

  

Termination Scenario

Compensation

Element

 

Death

 

Disability1

 

Retirement2

 

Termination

with Cause3

 

Termination

without Cause4

 

Termination due to

Change in Control5

Base Salary

 

Ceases

immediately

 

Continuation for

2 years6

 

Ceases

immediately

 

Ceases

immediately

 

Continuation for

2 years7

 

Ceases immediately

Severance Pay

 

None

 

None

 

None

 

None

 

None

 

Lump sum equal to 3

times base salary8

Annual Incentive

 

Prorated for the

year

 

Prorated for the

year

 

Prorated for the

year

 

None

 

None9

 

Lump sum equal to

3 times the higher of

(i) the most recent

annual incentive

award or (ii) the

current FY’s target

incentive award 910

Restricted Stock 1011

 

Awards vest

immediately

 

Awards vest
immediately

Awards vest

immediately

 Forfeited

Awards vest immediately

 

Forfeited

 

Forfeited

Awards vest

immediately

PSUs 1112

 

Awards are

prorated and vest

in normal course

 

Awards are

prorated and vest

in normal course

 

Awards are

prorated and vest

in normal course

 

Forfeited

 

Forfeited

 

Awards vest

immediately

  Deferred

Deferred Compensation 1213

 

Payable

immediately

 

Distributions

commence

after 6 months

per participants

election

 

Distributions

commence

after 6 months

per participants

election

 

Distributions

commence

after 6 months

per participants

Distributions 6 months per election

 Distributions

commencePayable immediately

after 6 months

per participants

electionHealth, Welfare and Other Benefits 14

 Payable immediately

  Health, Welfare

  and Other

  BenefitsNone

 None

Medical and

dental coverage

for 1 year 1315

 

None

 

None

 

Medical and

dental coverage

for 1 year 1416

 

Life insurance and

medical benefits

coverage for 3 years 1517

 

 

1

Disability is defined as a condition where the executive is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or which has lasted or can be expected to result in death or which has lasted or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months.

 

 

2

Retirement is defined as a voluntary termination of employment when either (i) the executive has reached age 55 and has at least 10 years of service with Standex, or (ii) the executive has reached age 55 and has at least 10 years of service with Standex, or (ii) the executive has reached age 65.

 

 

3

Termination with cause, under the terms of the executives’ employment agreements, is defined as a termination by Standex for the executive’s material breach of the employment agreement. A material breach is (i) an act of dishonesty which is intended to enrich the executive at the Company’s expense, or (ii) the willful, deliberate and continuous failure to perform the executive’s duties after being properly demanded to do so.

4

Termination without cause is a termination by Standex where the executive has not committed a material breach of the employment agreement. A material breach is (i) an act of dishonesty which is intended to enrich the executive at the Company’s expense, or (ii) the willful, deliberate and continuous failure to perform the executive’s duties after being properly demanded to do so.

 

622023 Proxy Statement


 4

Termination without cause is a termination by Standex where the executive has not committed a material breach of the employment agreement.5

5

A change in control is defined as an event where (i) any person or group (as used in sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act) becomes the beneficial owner (as defined in Rules 13d-3 and 13d-5 of the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of at least a majority of the equity securities of Standex entitled to vote for members of the Board of Directors; (ii) Standex is a party to a merger or consolidation, which results in Standex voting securities representing less than a majority of the resulting voting securities; (iii) the sale or disposition of all or substantially all of Standex’s assets; or (iv) a greater than 75% change in the composition of the Board of Directors during a consecutive 12-month period.

 

54

2020 PROXY STATEMENT


5 (continued)

An executive would be entitled to the payments described in this column after such a change in control only if, within 2 years of the change in control, either (i) the executive is terminated without cause,(a)or (ii) the executive voluntarily terminates their employment for “good cause.” (b)

 

 

(a)

Termination without cause is any termination by Standex other than a termination where there is conclusive evidence of substantial and indisputable intentional personal malfeasance in office, such as a conviction for embezzlement of Standex funds.

 

 

(b)

Good cause for Mr. Dunbar is defined as any of the following: (i) the assignment to any position other than President & CEO; (ii) any change in the reporting relationship such that he is no longer reporting solely to the Board of Directors; (iii) any reduction in the budget which results in him no longer having 100% control over the budget; (iv) any material diminution of base salary or incentive compensation; (v) any change in the location of employment to a location greater than 10 miles from the present location; and (vi) any other action or inaction of Standex that constitutes a material breach of the employment agreement.

Good cause for the other executives is defined as any of the following: (i) the assignment to any position other than President & CEO;a change in their general area of responsibility; (ii) anya change in their title; (iii) a change in the reporting relationship such that he is no longer reporting solely to the Boardplace of Directors; (iii) any reductionemployment; and (iv) a decrease in the budget which results in him no longer having 100% control over the budget; (iv) any material diminution of base salary or incentive compensation; (v) any change in the location of employment to a location greater than 10 miles from the present location; and (vi) any other action or inaction of Standex that constitutes a material breach of the employment agreement.

diminished benefits.

Good cause for the other executives is defined as any of the following: (i) a change in their general area of responsibility; (ii) a change in their title; (iii) a change in the place of employment; and (iv) a decrease in base salary or diminished benefits.

 

 

6

Mr. Dunbar’s employment agreement provides for a continuation of base salary for a period of 2 years up to the IRS compensation limit specified in IRC Section 401(a)(17), with the excess payable immediately upon termination. The other executives’Mr. Glass’ and Ms. Bell’s employment agreements provide for a continuation of base salary for a period of 1 year. Mr. Sarcevic and Mr. Valashinas do not receive a continuation of base salary upon termination due to a disability.

 

 

7

Mr. Dunbar’s employment agreement provides for a continuation of base salary for a period of 2 years up to the IRS compensation limit specified in IRC Section 401(a)(17), with the excess payable immediately upon termination. The other executives’ employment agreements provide for a continuation of base salary for a period of 2 years up to the IRS compensation limit specified in IRC Section 401(a)(17), with the excess payable immediately upon termination. The other executives’ employment agreements provide for a continuation of base salary for a period of 1 year.

 

 

8

Mr. Dunbar’s employment agreement provides for a lump sum severance payment in the amount of 3 times his then-current base salary. The remaining executives’ employment agreements provide for a lump sum severance payment in the amount of 32 times histheir then-current base salary. The remaining executives’ employment agreements provide for

9

On a lump sum severance paymentgo-forward basis, the Compensation Committee has approved that all executives would receive their annual incentive opportunity at target in the amountevent of 2 times their then-current base salary.a termination without cause.

 

 9

10

Mr. Dunbar’s employment agreement provides for an annual incentive payment equal to 3 times the higher of (i) the most recent annual incentive award or (ii) the current FY’s target incentive award. The remaining executives’ employment agreements provide for an annual incentive payment equal to 2 times the higher of (i) the most recent annual incentive award or (ii) the current FY’s target incentive award. Mr. Valashinas’ agreement also specifies a lump sum payment equivalent to the greater of (i) the current FY’s target incentive awards or (ii) the level of bonus accrual on the Company’s books as of the date of termination.

 

 10

11

Included in the RSUrestricted stock category are both RSAs that an executive received pursuant to a grant under the LTIP or OIP and RSUs that an executive received pursuant to a deferral under the MSPP.

12

For PSUs, except in the case of a termination for cause, without cause or due to a deferral underchange in control, the MSPP.PSUs are converted to shares of unrestricted stock once the performance period has ended and the Compensation Committee has determined the requisite payout in accordance with the performance levels. The number of PSUs that is converted is prorated to the date of the executive’s termination.

 

 11

For PSUs, except in the case of a termination for cause, without cause or due to a change in control, the PSUs are converted to shares of unrestricted stock once the performance period has ended and the Compensation Committee has determined the requisite payout in accordance with the performance levels. The number of PSUs that is converted is prorated to the date of the executive’s termination.13

12

See the “Standex Deferred Compensation Plan” section on page 42 48for more information about the plan and distribution options.

 

 13

14

Mr. Valashinas has an accumulated benefit under the now-frozen Standex Pension Plan. In every termination scenario, Mr. Valashinas would be entitled to a lump sum payment of his accumulated benefit amount under the Standex Pension Plan. The payment would be made in a lump sum due to the accumulated benefit value being less than $1,000.

15

Mr. Dunbar’s employment agreement provides for a continuation of medical and dental benefits for a period of 1 year. The other executives’ employment agreements do not provide for any health or welfare benefit continuation.

16

Mr. Dunbar’s employment agreement provides for a continuation of medical and dental benefits for a period of 1 year. Mr. Valashinas’ employment agreement provides for a reimbursement of COBRA premiums for a period of 1 year. The other executives’ employment agreements do not provide for any health or welfare benefit continuation.

 

 14

17

Mr. Dunbar’s employment agreement provides for a continuation of medical and dentallife insurance benefits for a period of 1 year.3 years. The other executives’ employment agreements do not provide for any health or welfare benefit continuation.

15

Mr. Dunbar’s employment agreement provides for a continuation of medical and life insurance benefits for a period of 3 years. The other executives’ employment agreements provide for a continuation of medical and life insurance benefits for a period of 2 years.

 

 2023 Proxy Statement63


Quantification of Potential Payments

 

2020 PROXY STATEMENT55


QUANTIFICATIONOF POTENTIAL PAYMENTS

The following table contains compensation information relating to the potential payments that an executive would receive in the various scenarios described above if the executive hadwas terminated due to a triggering event on June 30, 2020.2023. All such potential payments are largely based on the executive’s employment agreement with the Company, with the remaining payments based on award agreements under the LTIPOIP. Payments due to any executive upon actual termination of employment can only be determined at the time of termination. There can be no assurance that an actual termination or OIP.change in control would produce the same or similar results as those described below if it were to occur on any other date or if the actual circumstances at the time of termination were different. Potential payouts for Mr. DeByle’sBurns and Mr. Maschera are not included herein as their employment agreement and award agreements expired upon his departure in September 2019.was terminated prior to June 30, 2023.

                                    

TriggeringCompensation Payout ($) 1 
EventComponent David Dunbar Ademir Sarcevic Alan Glass Annemarie Bell Sean Valashinas 2 

Annual Incentive

 942,604  319,456  193,579  177,054  97,169 

Triggering

Event

  

Compensation

Component

 Payout ($) 1
David Dunbar Ademir Sarcevic Alan J. Glass Paul C. Burns James Hooven

Death

  

 

Acceleration of Outstanding

Equity Awards

 1,718,821 683,867 389,243 583,055 233,998

Acceleration of Outstanding Equity Awards

 14,656,628  3,592,222  2,419,416  735,762  729,705 

 

Pro-rata Performance Share

Vesting

 582,291 - 101,883 80,743 -

 

Total

 

 

2,301,112

 

 

683,867

 

 

491,126

 

 

663,797

 

 

233,998

Pro-rata Performance Share Vesting 3

 13,400,941  3,290,482  1,833,527  707,704  574,524 
Total  29,000,173   7,202,159   4,446,522   1,620,520   1,402,237 

Termination Payment - Salary

 1,800,838  469,408  392,376  322,885  278,460 

Annual Incentive

 942,604  319,456  193,579  177,054  97,169 

Disability

  

 

Termination Payment -

Salary

 1,704,176 415,000 360,500 360,500 330,000

Acceleration of Outstanding Equity Awards

 14,656,628  3,592,222  2,419,416  735,762  729,705 

 

Acceleration of Outstanding

Equity Awards

 1,718,821 683,867 389,243 583,055 233,998

 

Pro-rata Performance Share

Vesting

 582,291 - 101,883 80,743 -

 

Health &Welfare Benefits

 17,595 - - - -

 

Total

 

 

4,022,883

 

 

1,098,867

 

 

851,626

 

 

1,024,297

 

 

563,998

Pro-rata Performance Share Vesting 3

 13,400,941  3,290,482  1,833,527  707,704  574,524 

Health & Welfare Benefits

 15,839  -  -  -  - 
Total  30,816,850   7,671,567   4,838,898   1,943,405   1,679,858 

Annual Incentive

 942,604  319,456  193,579  177,054  97,169 

Retirement

  

 

Acceleration of Outstanding

Equity Awards

 1,718,821 683,867 389,243 583,055 233,998

Acceleration of Outstanding Equity Awards

 14,656,628  3,592,222  2,419,416  735,762  729,705 

 

Pro-rata Performance Share

Vesting

 582,291 - 101,883 80,743 -

 

Total

 

 

2,301,112

 

 

683,867

 

 

491,126

 

 

663,797

 

 

233,998

Pro-rata Performance Share Vesting 3

 13,400,941  3,290,482  1,833,527  707,704  574,524 
Total  29,000,173   7,202,159   4,446,522   1,620,520   1,402,237 

Termination

Without

Cause by the

Company

  

 

Termination Payment -

Salary

 1,704,176 415,000 360,500 360,500 330,000

Termination Payment - Salary

 1,800,838  469,408  392,376  322,885  278,460 

 

Health &Welfare Benefits

 17,595 - - - -

Health & Welfare Benefits

 15,839  -  -  -  22,125 

 

Total

 

 

1,721,771

 

 

415,000

 

 

360,500

 

 

360,500

 

 

330,000

Total  1,816,677   469,408   392,376   322,885   301,424 

Change in

Control 2

  

 

Termination Payment -

Salary

 2,556,264 830,000 721,000 721,000 660,000

 

Termination Payment -

Annual Incentive

 2,684,077 498,000 396,550 412,335 297,000

 

Acceleration of Outstanding

Equity Awards

 2,510,335 811,138 509,177 702,989 233,998

 

Health &Welfare Benefits

 64,351 52,831 52,831 54,609 47,800

 

Total

 

 

7,815,028

 

 

2,191,970

 

 

1,679,559

 

 

1,890,932

 

 

1,238,798

Severance Pay

 2,701,257  938,816  784,752  645,770  556,920 

Annual Incentive

 4,054,623  895,909  592,011  410,818  375,094 

Change in Control 4

Acceleration of Outstanding Equity Awards 5

 19,072,331  4,591,141  2,976,101  1,019,834  887,303 

Health & Welfare Benefits

 59,612  48,089  43,181  29,268  48,089 
Total  25,887,823   6,473,955   4,396,045   2,105,691   1,868,245 

 

1

The payout values for equity awards are based on the closing price of the Company’s stock on June 30, 20202023 ($57.55)141.47).

 

642023 Proxy Statement


 

2

In every termination scenario, Mr. Valashinas would be entitled to a lump sum payment of his accumulated benefit amount under the Standex Pension Plan in the amount of $839.30. This value is included in the totals but not listed separately in the table.

3

The pro-rata performance share vesting is based on the following:

For FY 2021 PSU awards, the number of shares used in the calculation is based on the certified performance percentage of 232.4%.

For FY 2022 PSU awards, the number of shares used in the calculation is based on achievement of superior performance and pro-rated at 2/3 since the termination event is 2/3 of the way through the performance period.

For FY 2023 PSU awards, the number of shares used in the calculation is based on achievement of superior performance and pro-rated at 1/3 since the termination event is 1/3 of the way through the performance period.

4

Upon a change in control, if the termination payments are triggered and exceed the amounts prescribed under IRC Section 280G such that the Company will be required to pay a tax under IRC Section 4999, the payment will be reduced to an amount such that the payment does not exceed IRC Section 280G.

5

Upon a change in control, ifoutstanding RSAs under the termination payments are triggeredOIP and exceedRSUs awarded under the amounts prescribed under IRC Section 280G such thatMSPP immediately vest at awarded amounts. For PSUs in general, outstanding awards vest at the Company will be required to pay a tax under IRC Section 4999,higher of target or actual performance through the payment will be reduced to an amount such thatCIC event. For purposes of the payment does not exceed IRC Section 280G.calculation, FY 2021 PSU awards, the number of shares is based on the certified performance percentage of 232.4%, while for FY 2022 and FY 2023 PSU awards, the number of shares is based on target.

CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure


As required by the SEC rules, we are providing the following information to show the ratio between the annual total compensation of our CEO in FY 2023 and the annual total compensation of the median employee of the Company.

As of June 30, 2023, Standex has approximately 3,900 employees in 57 locations across 19 countries. Approximately 68% of our employee population is located outside of the United States and approximately 66% of our global workforce is paid on an hourly basis. The median annual total compensation disclosed below is based on the Company’s global workforce and is not designed to capture the median compensation of Standex’s US employees. In order to attract and retain employees globally, we pay what we believe to be market competitive rates in each market where we operate. Our pay ratio below is a reasonable estimate that has been calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K using the data and assumptions summarized below.

As allowed by the SEC regulations, we have used the same median employee for the past three years. As required, for FY 2023, we have identified a new median employee for FY 2023. We used our global population as of June 30, 2023, including all global full- time, part-time and temporary employees, including newly hired employees, that were employed on that date. In determining our median employee, we used base annual salary during the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023. All international employees’ base annual salaries were converted to USD from local currencies using exchange rates as of June 30, 2023. We determined that the median employee was a full-time, hourly employee in our Electronics division, located in the United Kingdom.

For FY 2023, our median employee’s total compensation was £23,394, as calculated in accordance with Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Reg. S-K. This total compensation converted to USD is $31,941, using the June 30, 2023 GBP to USD exchange rate of 1.2699. Our CEO’s annual total compensation for FY 2023, as reported and detailed in the Summary Compensation Table was $5,098,597. Based on this information, the ratio of these two annual total compensations was estimated to be 160 to 1.

2023 Proxy Statement65


Pay Versus Performance


PvP Table

As required by the SEC rules, we are providing the following information about the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid (“CAP”) to our CEO, Mr. Dunbar, and other NEOs and certain financial performance metrics of Standex using the methodology that has been prescribed by the SEC.

                  Value of Initial Fixed $100         
          Average      Investment Based on:         
  Summary      Summary  Average      Peer Group      Company 
  Compensation  Compensation  Compensation  Compensation  Total  Total      Selected 
  

Table Total for

  

Actually Paid

  

Table Total for

  

Actually Paid

  

Shareholder

  

Shareholder

  

Net

  

Measure

 
  

PEO

  

to PEO

  

Other NEOs

  

to Other NEOs

  

Return

  

Return

  

Income

  

EBITDA

 
Year 

($) 1

  

($) 2

  

($) 3

  

($) 2

  

($)

  

($) 4

  

($)

  

($) 5

 

2023

  5,098,597   13,895,157   1,106,031   1,453,920   253.88   182.76   138,992,000   139,500,000 

2022

  5,135,735   5,047,799   1,205,257   1,157,888   150.63   141.55   61,393,000   129,057,000 

2021

  5,784,732   9,313,380   1,231,148   1,953,168   166.94   159.57   36,473,000   111,559,000 

1

Our PEO for all years in the table was our CEO, David Dunbar.

 

2

The adjustments, each of which is prescribed by SEC rules, to calculate the CAP are described in the table below.

3

Our Other NEOs for FY 2023 were: Ademir Sarcevic, Alan Glass, Annemarie Bell, Sean Valashinas, Paul Burns and Flavio Maschera.

56Our Other NEOs for FY 2022 were: Ademir Sarcevic, Alan Glass, Paul Burns and Flavio Maschera.
Our Other NEOs for FY 2021 were: Ademir Sarcevic, Alan Glass, Paul Burns and Jim Hooven.

4

The peer group is the S&P SmallCap 600 Industrial Sector Index, which is the same peer group used in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

5

The Company selected measure, adjusted EBITDA, stands for earnings before income tax, depreciation and amortization, and is a non-GAAP financial measure that is determined by the sum of (i) income from operations before income taxes, (ii) interest expense and (iii) depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA adjusts for restructuring charges, litigation charges, purchase accounting and acquisition related costs.

Financial Performance Measures

The following table lists the financial performance measures that, in the Company’s assessment, represent the most important measures used to link CAP for our NEOs to Company performance for FY 2023.

Adjusted Operating Income

Adjusted Operating Margin

Adjusted EPS

Net Working Capital Turns

ROIC

662023 Proxy Statement


Adjustments to Calculate CAP to PEO and Average CAP to Other NEOs

The table below describes the adjustments, each of which is required by SEC rules, to calculate CAP amounts from the SCT Total of our PEO and our Other NEOs. The SCT Total and CAP amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned or paid to our executives during the applicable years, but rather, are amounts determined in accordance with Item 402(v).

  2023  2022  2021 
Adjustment PEO  

Other

NEOs

  PEO  

Other

NEOs

  PEO  

Other

NEOs

 

SCT Total

  5,098,597   1,106,031   5,135,735   1,205,257   5,784,732   1,231,148 

Adjustment for defined benefit plans

  -   -   -   -   -   - 

Adjustment for stock awards 1

                        

(Deduct): Aggregate value for stock awards included in SCT

  (3,405,266)  (392,536)  (3,435,322)  (542,780)  (3,681,435)  (543,157)

Add: Fair value at FYE of awards granted during the FY that were outstanding at FYE

  5,005,533   428,779   3,168,159   480,938   5,837,304   954,192 

Add (Deduct): Change in fair value from prior FYE to current FYE of awards granted in prior years that were outstanding at FYE

  7,282,679   608,518   599,759   116,769   1,505,821   297,995 

Add: Fair value on vesting date of awards granted in the FY that vested during the FY

  -   -   -   -   -   - 

Add (Deduct): Change in fair value from prior FYE to vesting date of awards granted in prior years that vested during the FY

  (115,452)  (8,733)  (455,113)  (110,118)  (162,627)  5,244 

(Deduct): Fair value at prior FYE of awards granted in prior years that failed to meet the applicable vesting conditions during the FY

  -   (291,719)  -   -   -   - 

Add: Dividends or other earnings paid on awards in the FY

  29,066   3,580   34,581   7,822   29,585   7,746 

CAP Amounts (as calculated)

  13,895,157   1,453,920   5,047,799   1,157,888   9,313,380   1,953,168 

1

For (i) PSUs granted in the current FY with future vesting, and (ii) PSUs granted in prior FYs with future vesting, the number of PSUs used in the valuation is the number of PSUs granted at their probable outcome. For PSUs granted in prior FYs that vested in the current FY, the number of PSUs used in the valuation is the number of PSUs that vested.

For RSUs granted pursuant to a deferral under the MSPP, the CAP adjustment includes such RSUs in the year in which they are granted in accordance with ASC 718, rather than the year in which they are reported in the SCT. The fair value for such RSUs uses the Black-Scholes valuation model to determine the value of the discount on the shares at the various points in time required in the adjustments. The fair value of the discount is then added to the cash value of the executive’s annual incentive deferral underlying the specific MSPP deferral. E.g., for the annual incentive opportunity for FY 2022, the value of the annual incentive received in cash is reported in the Non-Equity Incentive Compensation column of the SCT for FY 2022 and the corresponding grant date fair value of any RSUs received pursuant to a deferral election under the MSPP for such annual incentive is reported in the SCT for FY 2022. The adjustment for CAP removes the grant date fair value of such RSUs reported in the SCT for FY 2022, but then includes the FYE fair value of such RSUs in FY 2023 because such RSUs were granted in FY 2023 and remained outstanding as of the FYE. The FYE fair value is determined by adding the value of the annual incentive opportunity deferred into the receipt of discounted RSUs and the value of the discount as of the FYE.

2023 Proxy Statement67


Relationship Between Compensation Actually Paid and Performance

The graphs below show the relationship between “compensation actually paid” to our PEO and Other NEOs to (i) TSR of both the Company and the S&P SmallCap 600 Industrial Sector Index, with the value of the initial fixed $100 investment measured as of June 30, 2020; (ii) the Company’s net income; and (iii) the Company’s adjusted EBITDA (non-GAAP).

CAP vs. Company TSR and Peer Group TSR

pg01.jpg

CAP vs. Net Income

pg02.jpg

CAP vs. Company-Selected Measure (Adjusted EBITDA)

pg03.jpg

682023 Proxy Statement


Questions & Answers

Voting Q&AHow to Vote:
How can I vote & how many votes do I have? 

2020 PROXY STATEMENTBeneficial Owners:


QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

VOTING Q&AIf your shares are held in street name, you will receive instructions from your bank, broker or other nominee on how to vote your shares. You must follow their instructions for your vote to be counted. If you wish to attend the Annual Meeting and vote your shares at that time, you must obtain a proxy from the broker, bank or other nominee and bring it to the Annual Meeting.

 

HOWCAN IVOTE &HOWMANYVOTESDO IHAVE?Shareholders of Record:If you are a shareholder of record, you may vote either in person at the Annual Meeting or by proxy. There are four ways to vote by proxy:

Shareholders at the close of business on August 31, 20202023 are entitled to vote. As of the record date, there were 12,316,78011,830,153 shares outstanding. You may vote the shares you own directly in your name as a shareholder of record, shares you hold through Standex benefit plans and shares held for you as a beneficial owner through a broker, bank or other nominee (shares held in “street name”). Each share is entitled to one vote.

HOWCANHow can ICHANGEMYVOTE? change my vote?

You may change your vote by revoking your proxy at any time before it has been exercised by:

u

Delivering a written notification to our Corporate Secretary that you are revoking your proxy;
comp.jpg

Vote by Internet.You may vote your shares via the Internet by visiting www.envisionreports.com/sxi and following the on-screen instructions.

u

Please have your proxy card available when you access the website.

Delivering a revised proxy dated later than the proxy you are revoking;

u

Voting again by Internet or telephone until 12:1:00 a.m. CST,ET, on October 20, 2020;

u 24, 2023;

Attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.
What is a Quorum?
tab.jpg

Vote by Telephone.You may vote your shares by telephone by calling toll-free to 1-800-652-8683 from the United States and Canada and following the series of voice instructions.

 

WHATISA QUORUM?Please have your proxy card available when you call.

A quorum is necessary to conduct business at the Annual Meeting. A majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting and represented either in person or by proxy constitutes a quorum. Your shares are counted as present if you have voted. If you abstain from voting, your shares are counted as present in determining a quorum. Broker non-votes are counted as present in determining a quorum.
What are Broker Non-votes?
mail.jpg

Vote by Mail.You may vote your shares by requesting a paper copy of the Proxy Statement (see page 71on how to do this) and signing, dating and mailing it in the enclosed envelope.

 

WHATARE BROKER NON-VOTES?Your signed proxy card must be received prior to the date of the Annual Meeting for your vote to be counted.

A broker non-vote occurs when a bank, broker or other nominee of share held in street name is represented at the Annual Meeting either in person or by proxy, but has not received instructions from the beneficial owner on how to vote the shares and cannot or chooses not to vote the shares. We strongly encourage shareholders who own shares in street name to instruct their bank, broker or other nominee on how to vote.
How are the votes counted?
pers.jpg

Vote in Person.You may attend the Annual Meeting in person and deliver a completed proxy card or vote by ballot.

HOWARETHEVOTESCOUNTED?

The Company has engaged EQ Proxy ServicesD.F. King to assist in soliciting proxies to establish the necessary quorum. Tabulation for the quorum shall be handled by EQ Proxy Services,D.F. King, which receives $5,500 as payment for their services, in addition to additional disbursements.

Official tabulation of voted proxies will be handled by Computershare, the Company’s transfer agent.

 

LOGO

How to Vote: Beneficial Owners: If your shares are held in street name, you will receive instructions from your bank, broker or other nominee on how to vote your shares. You must follow their instructions for your vote to be counted. If you wish to attend the Annual Meeting and vote your shares at that time, you must obtain a proxy from the broker, bank or other nominee and bring it to the Annual Meeting. Shareholders of Record: If you are a shareholder of record, you may vote either in person at the Annual Meeting or by proxy. There are four ways to vote by proxy: Vote by Internet. You may vote your shares via the Internet by visiting www.envisionreports.com/sxi and following the on-screen instructions. Please have your proxy card available when you access the website. Vote by Telephone. You may vote your shares by telephone by calling toll-free to 1-800-652-8683 from the United States and Canada and following the series of voice instructions. Please have your proxy card available when you call. Vote by Mail. You may vote your shares by requesting a paper copy of the Proxy Statement (see page 59 on how to do this) and signing, dating and mailing it in the enclosed envelope. Your signed proxy card must be received prior to the date of the Annual Meeting for your vote to be counted. Vote in Person. You may attend the Annual Meeting in person and deliver a completed proxy card or vote by ballot. Internet and telephone voting will be available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, until 12:1:00 a.m., Central StandardEastern Time, on October 20, 2020.24, 2023. You do not need to return your proxy card if you vote by Internet or telephone.

Official tabulation of voted proxies will be handled by Computershare, the Company’s transfer agent.

 

 2023 Proxy Statement69


What is Householding?

As permitted by the Exchange Act, and to reduce the expenses of delivering duplicate proxy materials, we deliver one Notice and, if applicable, Annual Report on Form 10-K and Proxy Statement, to multiple shareholders sharing the same mailing address unless otherwise requested. This is known as “householding.”

We will promptly send a separate Annual Report on Form 10-K and Proxy Statement to a shareholder at a shared address upon request at no cost. Shareholders with a shared address may also request that we send a single copy in the future if we are currently sending multiple copies to the same address.

 

 

Requests related to the delivery of proxy materials may be made by calling Investor Relations at (603) 893-9701 or writing to:

Standex International Corporation

23 Keewaydin Drive, Suite 300

Salem, New Hampshire 03079

Attention: Investor Relations

Shareholders who hold shares in “street name” (as described above) may contact their brokerage firm, bank or other nominee to request information about this householding procedure.

Communications, Shareholder Proposals & Nominations and Company Documents


How Can I Communicate with the Companys Directors?

The Board welcomes input and suggestions from shareholders and interested parties. Shareholders may communicate with the Board or any member of the Board by writing to the following address and addressing the correspondence accordingly:

Standex International Corporation
23 Keewaydin Drive, Suite 300
Salem, New Hampshire 03079
Attention: Corporate Governance Officer

Alternatively, shareholders may send an email to boardofdirectors@standex.com and specify the director, committee or group to be contacted in the message line.
 2020 PROXY STATEMENT57


WHATIS HOUSEHOLDING?

As permitted by the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and

Communications with the Board are distributed by the Corporate Governance Officer. The Corporate Governance Officer uses his or her discretion in determining whether to reduce the expenses of delivering duplicate proxy materials, we deliver one Notice and, if applicable, Annual Report on Form 10-K and Proxy Statement, to multiple shareholders sharing the same mailing address unless otherwise requested. This is known as “householding.”

We will promptly send a separate Annual Report on Form 10-K and Proxy Statement to a shareholder at a shared address upon request at no cost. Shareholders with a shared address may also request that we send a single copy in the future if we are currently sending multiple copies to the same address.

Requests related to the delivery of proxy materials may be made by calling Investor Relations at (603) 893-9701 or writing to:

Standex International Corporation

23 Keewaydin Drive, Suite 300

Salem, New Hampshire 03079

Attention: Investor Relations

Shareholders who hold shares in “street name” (as described above) may contact their brokerage firm, bank or other nominee to request information about this householding procedure.

COMMUNICATIONS, SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS & NOMINATIONSAND COMPANY DOCUMENTS

HOW CAN I COMMUNICATEWITHTHE COMPANYS DIRECTORS?

The Board welcomes input and suggestions from shareholders and interested parties. Shareholders may communicate with the Board or any member of the Board by writing to the following address and addressing the correspondence accordingly:

Standex International Corporation

23 Keewaydin Drive, Suite 300

Salem, New Hampshire 03079

Attention: Corporate Governance Officer

Alternatively, shareholders may send an email to boardofdirectors@standex.com and specify the director, committee or group to be contacted in the message line.

Communications with the Board are distributed by the Corporate Governance Officer. The Corporate Governance Officer uses his or her discretion in determining whether to

forward communications to the Board. Communications that are unrelated to the duties and responsibilities of the Board will not be distributed. Such items include, but are not limited to:

 

u 

spam

u 

junk mail and mass mailings

u 

product complaints or inquiries

u 

new product suggestions

u 

resumes and other forms of job inquiries

u 

surveys

u 

business solicitations or advertisements

In addition, material that is trivial, obscene, unduly hostile, threatening or illegal or similarly unsuitable items will be excluded; however, any communication that is excluded will be made available to any independent, non-employee director upon request.

In addition, material that is trivial, obscene, unduly hostile, threatening or illegal or similarly unsuitable items will be excluded; however, any communication that is excluded will be made available to any independent, non-employee director upon request.

 

HOW CANHow Can I SUBMITA SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALOR DIRECTOR NOMINATION?Submit a Shareholder Proposal or Director Nomination?

 

In accordance with Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act, certain shareholder proposals may be eligible for inclusion in our 2021 Proxy Statement. All shareholder proposals must comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-8 and must be received by our Corporate Secretary, in writing, no later than May 11, 2021. We strongly encourage any interested shareholder to contact our Corporate Secretary prior to the deadline to discuss the proposal. Submission of a proposal does not guarantee that it will be included in our Proxy Statement.

Shareholders may also nominate a director nominee for election at our 2021 annual meeting by following the provisions of the Company’s By-Laws. All nomination and supporting materials must comply with the requirements set forth in our By-Laws. Notice of such a nomination must be received by our Corporate Secretary, in writing, between May 11, 2021 and June 10, 2021. However, if the 2021 annual meeting is held more than 30 days before or more than 90 days after the anniversary of the 2020 Annual Meeting, the shareholder must submit the notice either (i) by 120 calendar days prior to the 2021 annual meeting or (ii) within 10 calendar days following the date on which the public announcement of the date of the 2021

In accordance with Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act, certain shareholder proposals may be eligible for inclusion in our 2024 Proxy Statement. All shareholder proposals must comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-8 and must be received by our Corporate Secretary, in writing, no later than May 11, 2024. We strongly encourage any interested shareholder to contact our Corporate Secretary prior to the deadline to discuss the proposal. Submission of a proposal does not guarantee that it will be included in our Proxy Statement.

Shareholders may also nominate a director nominee for election at our 2024 annual meeting by following the provisions of the Company’s By-Laws. All nomination and supporting materials must comply with the requirements set forth in our By-Laws. Notice of such a nomination must be received by our Corporate Secretary, in writing, between May 11, 2024 and June 10, 2024. However, if the 2024 annual meeting is held more than 30 days before or more than 90 days after the anniversary of the 2023 Annual Meeting, the shareholder must submit the notice either (i) by 120 calendar days prior to the 2024 annual meeting or (ii) within 10 calendar days following the date on which the public announcement of the date of the 2024 annual meeting is made.

Shareholders do not have to include their proposals in our Proxy Statement for them to be heard. Proposals may be introduced at our 2021 annual meeting from the floor. Notice of these proposals must be provided to our Corporate Secretary between May 11, 2021 and June 10, 2021 and must comply with the requirements set forth in our By-Laws.

The Company’s By-Laws are available on our website by going to ir.standex.com and clicking on “Governance” and then clicking on “Organizational Documents.” To make a submission or to request a copy of the Company’s By-Laws, shareholders should contact our Corporate Secretary at the following address:

Standex International Corporation

23 Keewaydin Drive, Suite 300

Salem, New Hampshire 03079

Attention: Corporate Secretary

We strongly encourage shareholders to seek advice from knowledgeable legal counsel and contact the Corporate Secretary before submitting a proposal or nomination.

58 

Shareholders do not have to include their proposals in our Proxy Statement for them to be heard. Proposals may be introduced at our 2024 annual meeting from the floor. Notice of these proposals must be provided to our Corporate Secretary between May 11, 2024 and June 10, 2024 and must comply with the requirements set forth in our By-Laws.

The Company’s By-Laws are available on our website by going to ir.standex.com and clicking on “Governance” and then clicking on “Organizational Documents.” To make a submission or to request a copy of the Company’s By-Laws, shareholders should contact our Corporate Secretary at the following address:

Standex International Corporation

23 Keewaydin Drive, Suite 300

Salem, New Hampshire 03079

Attention: Corporate Secretary

We strongly encourage shareholders to seek advice from knowledgeable legal counsel and contact the Corporate Secretary before submitting a proposal or nomination.

2020 PROXY STATEMENT70

2023 Proxy Statement
 



HOW CANHow Can I REQUEST DOCUMENTS?Request Documents?

Both this Proxy Statement and the Annual Report on Form 10-K may be viewed online at: www.envisionreports.com/SXI and on Standex’s website at ir.standex.com/annual-reports.

Shareholders may obtain print or emailed copies, free of charge, of this Proxy Statement, Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Codes of Conduct, Committee Charters or the Corporate Governance Guidelines by writing to:

Standex International Corporation

23 Keewaydin Drive, Suite 300

Salem, NH 03079

Attention: Investor Relations Department

Shareholders may also call Standex’s Investor Relations at (603) 893-9701 to request copies. Alternatively, print copies can also be requested by e-mailing the request to investorrelations@standex.com. All requests will be fulfilled within 3 business days of receipt and copies will be sent via first class mail.

HELPFUL RESOURCES

 

Helpful Resources


ANNUAL MEETING

 ACRONYMS

Proxy & Supplemental Materials

ir.standex.com/annual-reports 

ir.standex.com/annual-reports

BPP
Balanced Performance Plan

Online voting for registered shareholders

www.envisionreports.com/sxi 

www.envisionreports.com/sxi

CAP
Compensation Actually Paid

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

  

Standex Board

CIC

ir.standex.com/board-of-directors

Change in Control

Board Committees

ir.standex.com/board-committees

Audit Committee Charter

ir.standex.com/committee-charters

Compensation Committee Charter

ir.standex.com/committee-charters

Nominating and Corporate

Governance Committee Charter

ir.standex.com/committee-charters

FINANCIAL REPORTING

  CLOChief Legal Officer

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

DE&IDiversity, Equity & Inclusion
Standex Boardir.standex.com/board-of-directorsEBITEarnings Before Income Tax
Board Committeesir.standex.com/board-committeesEBITDAEarnings Before Income Tax, Depreciation & Amortization
Audit Committee Charterir.standex.com/committee-chartersEPSEarnings Per Share
Compensation Committee Charterir.standex.com/committee-chartersESGEnvironment, Social & Governance
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charterir.standex.com/committee-chartersGAAPGenerally Accepted Accounting Principles
Innovation and Technology Committee Charterir.standex.com/committee-chartersIRCInternal Revenue Code
IRSInternal Revenue Service
FINANCIAL REPORTINGMSPPManagement Stock Purchase Plan
Earnings & Financial Reports

ir.standex.com/quarterly-results 

ir.standex.com/quarterly-results

N&CG
Nominating & Corporate Governance

STANDEX

  NEONamed Executive Officer

Corporate Website

STANDEX
 

www.standex.com

NYSE
New York Stock Exchange

Leaders

Corporate Website
www.standex.com 

www.standex.com/about/management

OIP
2018 Omnibus Incentive Plan

Investor Relations

Leaders
ir.standex.com/management 

ir.standex.com

PCAOB
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
Investor Relationsir.standex.com PEOPrincipal Executive Officer

GOVERNANCE DOCUMENTS

  PSUsPerformance Share Units

By-Laws

GOVERNANCE DOCUMENTS
 

ir.standex.com/organizational-documents

ROIC
Return on Invested Capital

By-Laws

ir.standex.com/organizational-documentsRSAsRestricted Stock Awards
Certificate of Incorporation

ir.standex.com/organizational-documents 

ir.standex.com/organizational-documents

RSUs
Restricted Stock Units

Code of Conduct

ir.standex.com/policies 

ir.standex.com/policies

SCT
Summary Compensation Table

Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Management

ir.standex.com/policies 

ir.standex.com/policies

Corporate Governance Guidelines

SEC

ir.standex.com/organizational-documents

ACRONYMS

BPP

Balanced Performance Plan

CIC

Change in Control

CLO

Chief Legal Officer

EBIT

Earnings Before Income Tax

EBITDA

Earnings Before Income Tax, Depreciation & Amortization

EPS

Earnings Per Share

GAAP

Generally Accepted Accounting Principles

IRC

Internal Revenue Code

IRR

Internal Rate of Return

IRS

Internal Revenue Service

LTIP

2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan

MSPP

Management Stock Purchase Plan

N&CG

Nominating & Corporate Governance

NEO

Named Executive Officer

NYSE

NewYork Stock Exchange

OIP

2018 Omnibus Incentive Plan

PCAOB

Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

PSUs

Performance Share Units

ROIC

Return on Invested Capital

RSAs

Restricted Stock Awards

RSUs

Restricted Stock Units

SEC

Securities and Exchange Commission

TSR

Corporate Governance Guidelines
ir.standex.com/organizational-documents 

TSR

Total Shareholder Return

TRIR

Total Recordable Incident Rate

2020 PROXY STATEMENT  59TRIRTotal Recordable Incident Rate

 2023 Proxy Statement71


LOGO

23 Keewaydin Drive | Suite 300 | Salem, New Hampshire 03079 | +1.603.893.9701 | standex.com


LOGO

 

000004 ENDORSEMENT_LINE SACKPACK MR A SAMPLE DESIGNATION (IF ANY) ADD 1 ADD 2 ADD 3 ADD 4 ADD 5 ADD 6 C123456789 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext Your vote matters – here’s how to vote! You may vote online or by phone instead of mailing this card. Votes submitted electronically must be received by October 20, 2020 at 12:00 A.M., Central Time. Online Go to www.envisionreports.com/SXI or scan the QR code — login details are located in the shaded bar below. Phone Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories and Canada Save paper, time and money! Sign up for electronic delivery at www.envisionreports.com/SXI Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. Annual Meeting Proxy Card 1234 5678 9012 345 IF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. A Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all nominees listed in Proposal 1, FOR Proposal 2, and FOR Proposal 3. 1. Election of Directors For three year terms expiring in 2023: For Against Abstain For Against Abstain 01 - David Dunbar 02 - Michael A. Hickey For Against Abstain For Against Abstain 2. To conduct an advisory vote on the total compensation paid to the executives of the Company. 3. To ratify the appointment by the Audit Committee of Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent auditors. To transact such other business as may come before the meeting. B Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. Date and Sign Below Note: Please sign exactly as your name appears on this Proxy. If signing for estates, trusts, corporations or partnerships, title or capacity should be stated. If shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. C 1234567890 J N T 1UPX 467129 MR A SAMPLE (THIS AREA IS SET UP TO ACCOMMODATE 140 CHARACTERS) MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND 03AB5D


LOGO

Annual Meeting Materials are available at: http://www.envisionreports.com/SXI Small steps make an impact. Help the environment by consenting to receive electronic delivery, sign up at www.envisionreports.com/SXI IF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. REVOCABLE PROXY — Standex International Corporation ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OCTOBER 20, 2020 THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The stockholder of record hereby appoints David A. Dunbar and Alan J. Glass, and either of them, with full power of substitution, as Proxies for the stockholder, to attend the Annual Meeting of the Stockholders of Standex International Corporation (the “Company”), to be held at the Standex International Corporation Headquarters, 23 Keewaydin Drive, Suite 300, Salem NH 03079, on Tuesday, October 20, 2020 at 9:00 a.m., local time, and any adjournments thereof, and to vote all shares of the common stock of the Company that the stockholder is entitled to vote upon each of the matters referred to in this Proxy and, at their discretion, upon such other matters as may properly come before this meeting. In connection with those shares (if any) held by me as a participant in the Standex Retirement Savings Plan (the “Plan”), I hereby direct the trustee of the Plan in which I participate to vote all vested shares allocated to my account under such Plan on August 31, 2020 in accordance with the instructions on the reverse side of this proxy card or, if no instructions are given, in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendations, on all items of business to come before the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on October 20, 2020 or any adjournment thereof. Your voting instructions will be kept confidential from the officers, directors and employees of the Company. Under the Plan, the shares for which no signed proxy card is returned or for which any instructions are not timely received or are improperly executed shall be voted by the trustee in the same proportions on each Proposal for which properly executed instructions were timely received. This Proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein by the stockholder of record. If no direction is made, this Proxy will be voted FOR all nominees listed in Proposal 1, FOR Proposal 2, and FOR Proposal 3. PLEASE PROVIDE YOUR INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTE BY TELEPHONE OR THE INTERNET OR COMPLETE, DATE, SIGN, AND MAIL THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE. (Continued, and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side) C Non-Voting Items Change of Address — Please print new address below. Comments — Please print your comments below. Meeting Attendance Mark box to the right if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting.

def14a_page72.jpg

proxy_page1.jpg

proxy_page2.jpg